Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing federalists and anti federalists
Essay question for about the monroe doctrine
The monroe doctrine and roosevelt corollary essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing federalists and anti federalists
After George Washington left office, the second president of the United States, John Adams came into office in 1797. John Adams was a federalist and a pessimistic president, he was skeptical about society and believed they need to be governed. In 1798, congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts signed in to law by John Adams. These acts were passed in preparation for an anticipated war with France and asserted power to a centralized government. Like John Adams, Alexander Hamilton is one of our founding fathers of the constitution. He is a federalist and believed in an economy built on independence. Together, Adams and Hamilton had a vision of a centralized federal authority. A centralized federal authority being a government that is safest in the hands of wealthy and independent individuals. A challenge to this is the ability of the states to override the authorities. The national bank was created by Alexander Hamilton to stabilize and improve the nations economy. The national bank can solidify the control of federal authority by buying up the states debts. The federal government will buy the debt and owe the money instead, so it ties the states to the success of the federal government. The creation of the national bank allows the federal government to be dominant over the states. …show more content…
Thomas Jefferson became the third president in office in 1801. Thomas Jefferson was a democratic-republican and antifederalist. Thomas Jefferson believed in a world with an open society were people do not need to be governed, they need to be free to be successful. A future with no slavery and men did everything for themselves. Along with the Virginia Dynasty, Thomas Jeffersons vision was to expand land therefore Jefferson negotiated with Napoleon Bonaparte in 1803 and received a big piece land and this came to be know as the Luisiana Purchase. Jefferson knew he had "done an act beyond the constitution(238)" yet he also knew that the outcome would be of much benefit. One problem with the idea of expansion was foreign powers being an obstacle. Since the purchase, this expansion would bring Americans to closer contact with people from other nations. Also, people where already trading with other foreign nations. The Embargo Act was first issued by Jefferson to deal with foreign powers by cutting off all foreign trade but it became a major issue and was more harmful than helpful. Later when James Madison became president in 1808 he annexed Baton Rouge in to the American territory, this annexation showed how far and willing they will go to acquire land without embroiling the nation in war. This created a pattern future filibusters could emulate. Following Madison, James Monroe came into office in 1817, also being Virginia decent, wrote the Monroe Doctrine after the war of 1812 in 1823. The Monroe Doctrine was written to state that the United States will handle its own affairs and Europe should handle theirs. John Quincy Adams came in to office in 1825 and was later succeeded by the seventh U.S president, Andrew Jackson in 1829. Both John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson wanted equal rights and opportunities for white men. He believed that it was constitutional and crucial for the government to sponsor programs to improve society like constructions of roads and canals, but lack of federal founding prevented him from doing this. For this reason, John Quincy Adams introduced the Tariff of 1828 which was able to use the tax collected from it to cover for all of the internal improvements. Andrew Jacksons saw white male progress as a vision for the future and this consisted of them moving to the areas where the civilized tribes inhabited but Native Americans hindered this vision. For this matter Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Acts off 1830, allowing the government to forcibly remove any Native American The Indian Removal Act overturned the attitude that Washington saw for the future which aimed at acculturation. America slowly moved from a struggling republic to a thriving Atlantic power through acts and establishments, for example the Alien and Sedition Act.
The Alien and Sedition act established a sense of security though the Alien Friends Act but it also established immigration in America through the Naturalization Act. Another example being the Monroe Doctrine setting a standard with foreign relations. The Monroe Doctrine set a a neutrality in regards to future European dilemmas and in a friendly manner asked Europe to stay out of their business. Through the Luisiana purchase the U.S was able to expand its territory and gain control of more land and of the people living in the
land.
·The proposed band would raise $10 million through a public stock offering. The Treasury would hold one fifth of the stock and name one fifth of the directors, but four fifths of the control would fall to private hands. Private investors could purchase shares by paying for three quarters of their value in government bonds. In this way, the bank would capture a significant portion of the recently funded debt and make it available for loans; it would also receive a substantial and steady flow of interest payments for the Treasury. Anyone buying shares under these circumstances had little chance of loosing money.
Jefferson and Adams Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were both strong presidents who kept a stabile nation, but they differed in their methods of doing so. Adams was a federalist so he helped establish a stable government by focusing on forming a strong central government. Jefferson being a democrat-republican worked to establish stability in the US government by promoting state’s rights. They both worked for stability in different but successful ways.
JOHN ADAMS – A SHORT BIOGRAPHY HISTORY 1301 – U.S. HISTORY TO 1877 WHEN SEARCHING FOR THE MOST INFLUENTIAL PERSON DURING THE EARLY U.S. HISTORY, GEORGE WASHINGTON COMES TO THE FOREFRONT. INCIDENTLY, DUE TO THE GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION OF THE RESEARCH, THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION ON PEOPLE OR EVENTS ON HISTORY BEFORE 1877. TO MY SURPRISE, INFORMATION WAS LOCATED ON JOHN AND ABIGAIL ADAMS. JOHN AND ABIGAIL ADAMS SUPPOSIVELY HAD A WONDERFUL LIFE AND MARRIAGE TOGETHER. JOHN ADAMS SOMETIMES SEEMED TO BE A CONTRADICTING, RUDE AND OUTSPOKEN MAN, BUT AT OTHER TIMES PLAYFUL AND TENDER. ABIGAIL’S INTELLIGENT, CARING AND WITTY CHARACTER MADE UP FOR JOHN’S MANNERS, THEIR MARRIAGE SIGNIFIES THE POSITION IN WHICH A WOMAN WAS INVOLVED IN THE EVOLVING OF A GREAT MAN, FOR HER IMPORTANT FAMILY CONNECTIONS PROBABLY BENEFITED HIS CAREER. JOHN ADAMS WAS BORN IN 1735, BRAINTREE, MASSACHUSETTS TO JOHN ADAMS AND SUSANNA BOYLSTON. JOHN ADAMS WAS THE ELDEST OF THREE SONS. MR ADAMS WAS A DEACON AND FARMER (WHICH MEANT THE FAMILY WAS NOT WEALTHY). MRS ADAMS WAS BORN FROM ONE OF THE FIRST FAMILIES OF MASSACHUSETTS (THE BOYLSTON’S OWNED A LOT OF PROPERTY). JOHN ADAMS GRADUATED FROM HARVARD IN 1755. UPON GRADUATING, HE WAS OFFERED A JOB TO TEACH IN WORCHESTER. LIKE MOST BACHELORS, JOHN HAD NO INTEREST IN CHILDREN OR THE SLIGHTEST UNDERSTANDING OF THEM. BUT LIKE ANYONE HE ADAPTED TO THE SITUATION, PROBABLY BECAUSE HE HAD TWO YOUNGER BROTHERS. JOHN MARRIED ABIGAIL SMITH IN 1764. ABIGAIL WAS THE SECOND OF FOUR CHILDREN, BORN IN 1744.
“It’s not tyranny we desire; it’s a just, limited, federal government.” Alexander Hamilton. When Hamilton said this he was expressing the way he felt about central government. Hamilton and Jefferson both had very different views on government. Hamilton wanted a strong central government and Jefferson wanted all of the power to belong to the states. Alexander Hamilton’s views on government were better for what the United States would become.
Federalists called for a national debt to be funded and hoped to create a large national bank credited by wealthy men. He defended it in a plan presented to Congress by claiming "where the authority of the government is general it can create corp...
During his term as secretary of the treasury, he acted with the power and commanding force of a Prime Minister. None of the other founding fathers contributed as much to the economy’s growth, and the shape of the country in general, as he did. Alexander Hamilton was the most influential of the United States’ early politicians in the development of the country’s economy. One of the earliest examples of Hamilton’s power was his role in the national assumption of state debts. After the Revolutionary War, individual states had varying amounts of debt.
John Adams was the last Federalist president which led to the next 16 years of Thomas Jefferson as president for two terms and James Madison as president for two terms. Jefferson and Madison were members of the Republican Party, which had principles and philosophies that were very different than the views of the Federalists. Jefferson and Madison each abandoned the Republican philosophies for Federalism. Jefferson and Madison took on Federalist views while being President of the United States. However, Jefferson and Madison each picked somewhere to stand their ground and keep some of their Republican views.
As a federalist Alexander Hamilton wanted to establish a stronger federal government under a new Constitution. He met in Philadelphia with other delegates to discuss how to fix the Articles of Confederation that created a weak central government. During the meeting, Hamilton expressed his view that a dependable current source of revenue would be crucial to develop a more powerful and resilient central government. Although Hamilton played a diminutive part in the writing of the Constitution itself, he did heavily influence its ratification. In cooperation with James Madison and John Jay, Hamilton wrote fifty one of eighty five essays under the joint title The Federalist “The Federalist Paper.” In the essays, he cunningly explained and defended the newly drafted Constitution prior to its approval. In 1788, at the New York Ratification Convention, two thirds of delegates opposed the Constitution, however Hamilton was a powerful advocate for ratification, effectively arguing against the anti Federalist persuasion. His efforts succeeded when New York agreed to ratify, which led the remaining eight states to follow. He had a proposal for the new government that was modeled on the British system, which Hamilton considered the best.
Going hand in hand with his detestation of large, extremely controlling national governments, Jefferson was intent on having no national bank present in the US, but Hamilton was certain the country would benefit from one. For example, in a personal letter written by Alexander Hamilton, he wrote, “Mr. Madison, co-operating with Mr. Jefferson, is at the head of a faction, decidedly hostile to me, and my administration; and actuated by views... subversive of the principals of good government, and dangerous to the Union... Mr. Jefferson... [displays] his dislike of... funding [the] debt.” (Doc 2) Hamilton implied that by not advocating a national bank, Jefferson did not want to help the country pay off its debt. Jefferson, however, was dead set against having a national bank because he wanted the common people, such as the farmers, to have maximum influence on the government. This way, a strong central government could not have supreme political, economic, and social power, all of which together would open the doors for future corruption, even if the government was set up in the manner directed in the Constitution. Jefferson defended this judgement to the extent that he formed a political party so it could develop into a well-supported suggestion. Thus, the perspective on national banks could more efficiently progress into the point where it impacted the whole country and prevented the formation of a national bank. Equally, the excise tax proposed by Alexander Hamilton and carried out by Congress, factored in on Hamilton and Jefferson’s feud on having a national bank. In a letter written by Thomas Jefferson, he manifested his reaction to the excise tax by commenting, “The excise tax is an infernal one... [the public’s]
Primarily, the United States foreign policy behind the Monroe Doctrine was introduced by President James Monroe in the midst of many Latin American countries gaining their independence from Spain. The doctrine stated that attempts by European countries to colonize or interfere with states in the Western Hemisphere would be viewed as acts of aggression and U.S. intervention would be necessary. The Monroe Doctrine set the precedent for various foreign policies that would result in U.S. involvement in Latin America.
One such issue was that of the National debt and creating a National Bank. In 1790, Alexander Hamilton proposed that Congress should establish a national bank, in which private investors could buy stock, could print paper money, and keep government finances safe. Washington signed the bill establishing a national bank and started a strong foundation for a thriving economy and a stable currency.
After the first War for Independence, The United States was approximately $52 million in debt. Due to having such bad financial problems, the United States created a national Bank to create one unified currency, to take away all state debts, and to issue loans to the people to promote growth. This National Bank was created by Alexander Hamilton who was a Federalist, and once Jefferson came to be the President, he continued the idea of the national bank because it was helping to reduce the national debt. The primary reason for the National Bank being a representation of a Federalist idea was because since it was issuing loans to people it was able to promote industrial growth which was one of the main goals of the Federalist party. From Jefferson continuing the use of the National Bank thru his presidency he demonstrates his need to continue a loose constructionist idea.
The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions were responses to the infamous Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798 enacted by President John Adams and the Federalists who subjugated Congress at the time. The Sedition Act criminalized certain forms of speech, including “untrue” criticism of the President and Congress, and provided for fines and prison terms of up to two years. The Alien Act endorsed the deportation, during times of war or the threat of war, of resident aliens who were found by federal courts to be enemies of the United States, whether they had engaged in warfare or
The Kentucky resolutions were significant documents during the 18th century in response to the Alien and Sedition acts originally drafted by Thomas Jefferson. Their Purpose was to expose the Alien and sedition acts as unconstitutional. I agree with Thomas Jefferson that the Acts were unconstitutional because the acts are taking away certain individual rights given to the people as addressed in the constitution. As well as, any power not given specifically to the US government remains with the states and the people within those states.
Federalism, by definition, is the division of government authority between at least two levels of government. In the United States, authority is divided between the state and national government. “Advocates of a strong federal system believe that the state and local governments do not have the sophistication to deal with the major problems facing the country” (Encarta.com).