Essay Comparing Frankenstein And The Picture Of Dorian Gray

1295 Words3 Pages

The simple definition of a monster according to Merriam-Webster is “a strange or horrible imaginary creature.” Although this definition is correct, it does not fully encompass the entirety of what it means to be a monster. In most literature, authors who reference monsters typically create an unknown creature or a disfigured animal. Two exceptions to this conventional thought are the authors of Frankenstein and The Picture of Dorian Gray, which tell stories of a different kind of monster. Both Mary Shelley and Oscar Wilde approach the portrayal of a monster from different points of view, but they share the same opinion on what makes a monster. Both authors believe a monster to be a human that is cowardly, irresponsible, and self indulgent much …show more content…

Shelley takes a subtle approach when introducing her opinion of a monstrous man when writing Frankenstein because “Shelley’s was an age in which heart triumphed over head” (Griffith 194). The Romantic Era, a time period which focuses on the individual and his emotions, is Shelley’s base period for Frankenstein. She emphasizes idea that the creation is the victim of his creator who is considerably the monster because he thinks only of his individual needs and does not take responsibility for his creation. While some believe that Victor is the father of the Creation, he does not deserve nor acknowledge the title as he should. Victor does not guide the Creation as a father should his child and he victimizes himself knowing he is responsible for the Creation and his actions. George V. Griffith mentions in his criticism that [Victor’s] ‘sin’ is not solely in creating the monster but in abandoning him to orphanhood at his birth. . . .Childlike in his innocence, the monster wants only to be loved, but he gets love from neither his ‘father’ nor from any other in the human community” (194-195). By abandoning his creation, victor created a monster of circumstance. The creation recognizes that he is different …show more content…

Mary Shelley and Oscar Wilde both believed that to be considered a monster, one must surpass the physical appearance of the typical monster and be emotionally detached, cowardly, and selfish. Mary Shelley wrote Victor Frankenstein as a man who willingly created a creature out of greed and a thirst for knowledge but never took responsibility for his actions nor the actions of his creation. George V. Griffith writes in his criticism “The monster is not evil; he is transformed into evil by a human injustice. . .” (Griffith 196). Because the creation is hated and rejected by others, Towards the end of the story, Victor finally recognizes that he must take responsibility for his creation and he states that “for the first time also [he] felt what the duties of a creator towards his creature were and that [he] ought to render him happy before [he] complained of his wickedness” (Mary Shelley 70). Similarly, Lord Henry is a coward and a narcissistic monster who takes pleasure in spoiling the lives and thoughts of others. This thought is proven by his corruption of the innocent Dorian Grey. In the novel, the artist Basil Hallward repeatedly asks his good friend Lord Henry not to influence Dorian Gray because Basil knows what Henry is capable of and knows that Dorian Gray is too naive and gullible to

Open Document