Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Life of a female slave harriet jacobs
Slave narrative essays
Life of a female slave harriet jacobs
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
American literature consists of many different kinds of narratives. During the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, a new type of narrative emerged: the slave narrative. Though they both share similar experiences, Equiano and Jacobs feel very differently about their circumstances and society. Equiano holds a more charitable view of his masters, but Jacobs examines her owners' good traits and bad qualities. Both writers were valuable to their masters, but they proclaimed their value in different ways. The differences in these two narratives can be attributed to the different personalities of Jacobs and Equiano. Equiano and Jacobs both held different views on buying their freedom. Jacobs believed she had a right to freedom and …show more content…
should not have to pay for it. After Linda (Jacob's alter ego in her narrative) runs away, her master's family tries to bring her back. One of her former master's relations tells one of Jacob's friends to tell him where Jacobs is. Linda would then have the chance to buy her freedom. The friend replies, "I don't think it would be of any use, sir. I have heard her say she would go to the ends of the earth, rather than pay any man or woman for her freedom, because she thinks she has a right to it," (Jacobs, 108). Jacobs writes that she is "unwilling to buy what [she has] already a right to possess," (Jacobs, 84). This attitude is quite distinctive from Equiano's views on buying freedom. Equiano was glad that he was able to buy his freedom.
Whenever he could, he "worked with redoubled alacrity, from the hope of getting money enough by these voyages to buy [his] freedom," (Equiano, 170). When he had saved enough money to buy his freedom, his master was reluctant to let him go. When Equiano asked his master to honor his promise and accept money for freedom, his master regretted the promise he had made. (Equiano, 189). His master was reluctant to give Equiano his freedom, but fortunately a kindhearted man was standing by. He persuaded Equiano's master to honor his word. "I know Gustavus (the name given to Equiano by his master) has earned you more than an hundred a-year, and he will still save you money, as he will not leave you," (Equiano, 190). The master grudgingly freed Equiano, who used his newfound freedom to help other …show more content…
slaves. Equiano comes across as very charitable and open-minded in his narrative.
He does not read into the actions or motives of his owners, he simply tries to narrate the facts of his captivity and survive. "Every body on board used me very kindly, quite contrary to what I had seen of any white people before," (Equiano, 76). He writes of being robbed by some white people and of being treated well by others, but he does not let his situation discourage him. "Rather than deplore his condition, Equiano opts to make the best of the situation and make the system that oppresses him pay him, too," (Bozeman, 9). He accepts the new name his master gives him and works hard. (Equiano, 77). Equiano even makes several friends during the course of his narrative: a boy his age named Richard Baker, and later a woman named Miss Guerin, who convinced him to be
baptized. Perhaps Equiano's apparent conversion is the difference between Jacobs's and Equiano's narratives. Jacobs is more critical of her masters than Equiano, who simply tells the facts of his slavery without trying to influence his readers. "I was told that my home was now to be with her mistress; and I found it a happy one. No toilsome or disagreeable duties were imposed upon me," (Jacobs, 6). Her happiness did not last long, however. Her next master, Dr. Flint, was the complete opposite of her former owner. Everything Jacobs writes about Dr. Flint is unfavorable. "He tried his utmost to corrupt the pure principles my grandmother had instilled," (Jacobs, 17). Flint harassed Linda and wanted her to be his mistress, then made her life miserable when she refused. Jacobs was shrewd enough to realize that Flint had no good qualities besides his wealth. In Jacob's narrative, she explores the moral qualities of everyone, understanding that both good and bad can be found. Her mistress teaches her to read and teaches her about the principle of the Golden Rule, or "Love your neighbor as yourself," but she also complains bitterly that her mistress did not follow the principles that she taught. "I was her slave, and I suppose she did not recognize me as her neighbor. I would give much to blot out from my memory that one great wrong," (Jacobs, 6). Even though she is upset with her mistress, Jacobs does not neglect to mention the good things her mistress did for her. Her benefits from her kind mistress included the ability to read and write. This enabled her to give slave women a voice through her narrative. In Equiano's narrative, there is a sharp contrast between good and bad. His owners seem very black and white: they are either humane or cruel, but there is not much in between. His second owners, who are a rich African family, treat him like one of their own children. In fact, Equiano was treated so well that he thought he might be adopted into the family. (Equiano, 59). When he is taken to the West Indies, he is shocked at the cruelty of the overseers, who "cut and mangle the slaves in a shocking manner on the most trifling occasions, and altogether treat them in every respect like brutes," (Equiano, 142). He is mistreated several times throughout the narrative just because of the color of his skin. He is grateful that his owners seem to value him enough to take good care of him. Equiano seemed proud of his worth as a slave. "He understands his position, while a slave, as transportable property. He knows that his worth during slavery is purely economic," (Bozeman, 5). He mentions the fact that he saved his master money, or made money for his master. "I became very useful to my master; and saved him, as he used to acknowledge, above a hundred pounds a year," (Equiano, 139). He goes on to mention how some slave owners never get their money's worth out of their slaves, but how many more earn the money back very quickly. Like Equiano, these slaves become very valuable to their masters. Jacobs mentions that she is valuable, but she lets the facts of her narrative or other people in the narrative tell her value. After she runs away, Dr. Flint's family is determined to get Linda back. "Mrs. Flint openly declared that her daughter could not afford to lose so valuable a slave as I was," (Jacobs, 107). Linda finds the Bruces, a couple who protect her from her pursuers. The Bruces even enter into legal arguments on Linda's behalf. The Bruce's lawyer "proposed to pay three hundred dollars down" if Mr. Dodge would sell Jacobs. This was also the amount of money that Dr. Flint had offered to pay as a reward for Linda's recapture. (Jacobs, 55). Jacobs does not boast about herself in any way. In fact, she seems more proud of her family's accomplishments than she does of her own. Jacobs and Equiano both share some common themes in their writings: "legal resistance to economic and sexual exploitation, rhetorical methods for claiming authority and personhood," (Warner, 6). Jacobs experiences sexual exploitation at the hand of Dr. Flint, so she is able to speak out of her eEquiano writes about the slave women who are abused by their masters, and the injustices that black men experience for falling in love with white women. (Equiano, 141). Both their narratives deal with the idea of being self-reliant even in slavery and earning money to buy their freedom. Jacobs' father was a carpenter who was allowed to support himself if he gave a certain amount of money to his owner each year. (Jacobs, 1) Equiano was able to earn money as well. He could read and write, and he knew how to dress hair. Jacobs and Equiano both write about a side to slavery that is not seen often. They write of freedom and independence, something many slaves never experienced. Jacobs' narrative stems from the "unique combination of experiences that informed her story," (Warner, 1). This is also true for Equiano, who was enslaved in Africa, Britain, and America before earning his freedom. Some of their views and feelings about their masters and slavery in general clash, but they both present a well-thought out narrative. The uniqueness of their situations makes them stand out among other slave narratives. "Equiano distinguishes himself as one who, via determination and hard work, as well as chance, overcomes the confines of slavery to propel himself to some of the upper echelons of British society," (Bozeman, 1).
Despite each individual having different circumstances in which they experienced regarding the institution of slavery, both were inspired to take part in the abolitionist movement due to the injustices they witnessed. The result is two very compelling and diverse works that attack the institution of slavery and argue against the reasons the pro-slavery individuals use to justify the slavery
The fight for racial equality is one of the most prominent issues Americans have faced throughout history and even today; as the idea that enslaving individuals is unethical emerged, many great and innovative authors began writing about the issues that enslaved people had to face. Olaudah Equiano was no exception. In his work The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, he attempts to persuade his readers that the American way of slavery is brutal, inhumane, and unscrupulous. Equiano manages to do this by minimizing the apparent differences between himself and his primarily white audience, mentioning the cruelties that he and many other slaves had to face, and the advantages of treating your slaves correctly.
In Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, a slave narrative published in 1845, Frederick Douglass divulged his past as a slave and presented a multifaceted argument against slavery in the United States. Douglass built his argument with endless anecdotes and colorful figurative language. He attempted to familiarize the naïve Northerners with the hardships of slavery and negate any misconstrued ideas that would prolong slavery’s existence in American homes. Particularly in chapter seven, Douglass both narrated his personal experience of learning to write and identified the benefits and consequences of being an educated slave.
Olaudah Equiano was a freed slave living in London who made it his life person to abolish the British slave trade. His knowledge and training of the English language allowed him to grow into one of the key figures in the movement to abolish the slave trade in England. Although many scholars acknowledge his incredible talent, there has been evidence in the recent years that may question his reliability as a first-hand account. There is evidence to support that Equiano may have been born in South Carolina. This evidence does not make him a valid source of information about the slave trade and leads his audience to question his statements.
With new found freedom, he set forth to apply it where he could, as an activist. “From that period, to the present time, my life has passed in an even tenor, and a great part of my study and attention has been to assist in the cause of much injured countrymen.” (191) Equiano became active by promoting and petitioning slavery and dedicated his life to the freedom of his enslaved people.
In, “The Narrative of the life of Frederick Douglass”, readers get a first person perspective on slavery in the South before the Civil War. The author, Frederick Douglass, taught himself how to read and write, and was able to share his story to show the evils of slavery, not only in regard to the slaves, but with regard to masters, as well. Throughout Douglass’ autobiography, he shares his disgust with how slavery would corrupt people and change their whole entire persona. He uses ethos, logos, and pathos to help establish his credibility, and enlighten his readers about what changes needed to be made.
When inquiring about the comparisons and contrasts between Melville’s Benito Cereno and Frederick Douglass’s Narrative of the Life of an American Slave, Written by Himself, the following question almost inevitably arises: Can a work of fiction and an autobiography be compared at all? Indeed, the structure of the two stories differs greatly. Whereas Douglass’s Narrative adapts a typical pattern of autobiographies, i.e. a chronological order of birth, childhood memories, events that helped shape the narrator etc., Benito Cereno is based on a peculiar three-layered foundation of a central story recounting the main events, a deposition delineating the events prior to the first part, and an ending.
Equiano way of slavery is differently than that of Jacobs. Equaino was taken from his homeland of Africa. He was apart of what is known as the Middle Passage which was considered a deadly voyage for many slaves that were apart of this voyage across the Atlantic. After his arrival, he experience the hard labor. Jacobs, who was born into slavery was already born in what was considered the "New America". Equiano way of telling his narratives was in more of a chronological way with vivid description of what he was being faced with everyday. Jacobs not only told what slavery was like for her, but also provide more emotion than that of Equiano. She gave stories of others like slave that was previously own by Dr. Flint and fathering of other slave 's children. Unlike Equiano, he was given his other name of Gustavus Vassa by his master, Jacobs wrote her narrative under the name of Linda Bendt and changed names of others in her narrative in order to protect the reputation of those . Although Equiano talks about what woman 's went through during slavery, it was Jacobs he gave more of an in-depth of it with dealing with lust from a master and only being known as the property of her master and her master only. Both authors expressed in their own way that once you fall into slavery, you lose sense of who you are and the morals you were brought up
The issue of Slavery in the South was an unresolved issue in the United States during the seventeenth and eighteenth century. During these years, the south kept having slavery, even though most states had slavery abolished. Due to the fact that slaves were treated as inferior, they did not have the same rights and their chances of becoming an educated person were almost impossible. However, some information about slavery, from the slaves’ point of view, has been saved. In this essay, we are comparing two different books that show us what being a slave actually was. This will be seen with the help of two different characters: Linda Brent in Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl and Frederick Douglass in The Narrative of the life of Frederick
In comparison to other slaves that are discussed over time, Olaudah Equiano truly does lead an ‘interesting’ life. While his time as a slave was very poor there are certainly other slaves that he mentions that received far more damaging treatment than he did. In turn this inspires him to fight for the abolishment of slavery. By pointing out both negative and positive events that occurred, the treatment he received from all of his masters, the impact that religion had on his life and how abolishing slavery could benefit the future of everyone as a whole; Equiano develops a compelling argument that does help aid the battle against slavery. For Olaudah Equiano’s life journey expressed an array of cruelties that came with living the life of an
Therefore, gender separated the two narratives, and gave each a distinct view toward slavery. Douglass showed “how a slave became a man” in a physical fight with an overseer and the journey to freedom. Jacobs’s gender determined a different course, and how women were affected. Douglass and Jacob’s lives might seem to have moved in different directions, but it is important not to miss the common will that their narratives proclaim of achieving freedom. They never lost their determination to gain not only freedom from enslavement, but also the respect for their individual humanity and the other slaves.
The reader is first introduced to the idea of Douglass’s formation of identity outside the constraints of slavery before he or she even begins reading the narrative. By viewing the title page and reading the words “The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, written by himself” the reader sees the advancement Douglass made from a dependent slave to an independent author (Stone 134). As a slave, he was forbidden a voice with which he might speak out against slavery. Furthermore, the traditional roles of slavery would have had him uneducated—unable to read and incapable of writing. However, by examining the full meaning of the title page, the reader is introduced to Douglass’s refusal to adhere to the slave role of uneducated and voiceless. Thus, even before reading the work, the reader knows that Douglass will show “how a slave was made a man” through “speaking out—the symbolic act of self-definition” (Stone 135).
He finally settled with a family who made brought him close to the happiness his biological family gave, but to only be torn away. He describes the horror and the torture not able to his see the world that he loved so dearly anymore. Saying farewell to the people who spoke his language, looked like him, and obtained many of the same traditions as his tribe. Equiano was now embarking on a brand new adventure. Being used to the slavery of his own world made his life somewhat bearable; being shipped off to another existence, seeing many unfamiliar faces, is a different story.
As both the narrator and author of “Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass: An American Slave, Written by Himself” Frederick Douglass writes about his transition from a slave to a well educated and empowered colored young man. As a skilled and spirited man, he served as both an orator and writer for the abolitionist movement, which was a movement to the abolishment of slavery. At the time of his narrative’s publication, Douglass’s sole goal of his writings was to essentially prove to those in disbelief that an articulate and intelligent man, such as himself, could have,in fact, been enslaved at one point in time. While, Douglass’ narrative was and arguably still is very influential, there are some controversial aspects of of this piece, of which Deborah McDowell mentions in her criticism.
"The Life of Olaudah Equiano” is a captivating story in which Equiano, the author, reflects on his life from becoming a slave to a freeman during the 19th century. Through his experiences and writing, Equiano paints a vivid picture of the atrocities and cruelties of European slavery. Ultimately through his narrative, Equiano intends to persuade his audience, the British government, to abolish the Atlantic slave trade as well as alert them of the harsh treatment of slaves. He successfully accomplishes his goal by subtly making arguments through the use of character, action, and setting.