Essay Comparing Crucible And Good Luck

855 Words2 Pages

Arthur Miller’s The Crucible and George Clooney’s Good Night and Good Luck both delve deep into the dangers of McCarthyism and groupthink. Both works fully illustrate the repercussions of falling prey to the whims of the accuser. While the public is easily swayed and led along by these people, like Abigail and Senator McCarthy, they are much less keen to address the underlying problems that allowed hysteria to bloom in the first place. The two stories highlight how underlying problems fester into more wide-spanning issues when people focus on fabricated issues rather than the real problems they experience. Both stories make clear how and why the leaders in these hysterical movements use the public for their own gain. Abigail and McCarthy’s …show more content…

Once debased, it becomes much more difficult for the Judges and the public to cut through the lies, muddying the metaphorical water. Later in this scene, Judge Danforth questions Mary while yelling, “Speak!” in her face (117). Danforth is a prime example of the power Abigail has over the public eye. He questions only Mary and her motives, rather than interrogating both sides. McCarthy’s HUAC committee hearing works similarly to how Abigail manipulates the court; as Edward Murrow put it, it allows McCarthy to “[pursue] anyone he feels may have connections to the communist party” (Good Night and Good Luck). Often, the people they target are the people who challenge the committee's methods, just like Abigail. Another parallel exists between the moment when Abigail threatens the judge with possible accusations and when McCarthy accuses Murrow of harboring communist connections. The moment when Abigail, in an open threat, snaps at Danforth, declaring, “Let you beware, Mr. Danforth. Think you to be so mighty that the power of Hell may not turn your wits?” is her last-ditch effort to maintain power (Miller

Open Document