Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Epic of Gilgamesh analysis
Brief overview of the epic of gilgamesh
Transformation of Gilgamesh
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Epic of Gilgamesh analysis
Every human will share at least two experiences. Birth and Death. These central events get a lot of literary airtime, and rightfully so, they are important events. However, they are the bookends to the human experience, and what makes a human a person is every other event stacked between them. As a salute to these medial events, literary genres that focus on the development of the individual, like the Bildungsroman, have developed. Some of the most influential literature that humanity has access to, such as The Epic of Gilgamesh, follow the guidelines of a Bildungsroman. Despite not being in novel format, The Epic of Gilgamesh still tells the story of moral maturity. Our protagonist, once a tyrannical adventurer, learns how to be a good ruler …show more content…
while coming to a greater spiritual understanding of life and death. His journey takes him from the boy-like tyrant, who, while physically grown, lived only to serve his own desires, to the wise king that returns from the underworld. To simplify things, Gilgamesh grows up. Gilgamesh’s newfound maturity is exemplified in the change of his views, particularly those on his adventuring and his city, Uruk; and these changes are best displayed through repetition within the opening and closing lines of the epic.
The main source of plot movement in The Epic of Gilgamesh is Gilgamesh’s drive for adventure. However, it becomes apparent with the progression of the story that Gilgamesh derives less and less pleasure from his journeys. The reader is even given the sense that Gilgamesh, despite having successfully made a name for himself by “[[learn]ing] of everything the sum of wisdom,” (I. 5, p.1), is disappointed by the ultimate result of his adventuring. Evidence of this is found in the speed of travel and amount of description on the journey to and from the underworld. Gilgamesh’s trip to the underworld to find immortality takes a whole tablet and is filled with many obstacles, but the return journey seems to only take two days and is dedicated only two meagerly lines (XI. 319-320, p. ). The quick and unenthusiastic trip home suggests that Gilgamesh is at the very least unsettled, if not outright disappointed, with the result of his long journey. Gilgamesh’s lack of interest in the accomplishment of his original goals (the quest for glory and power) also proposes …show more content…
that he has grown to value other, possibly more important, things such as his mortality. This reevaluation of motivation is a signal of Gilgamesh’s new maturity. The journey home to Uruk also echoes the format of earlier travels in a way that proposes that Gilgamesh’s taste for adventure has somewhat dimmed. The original text from tablet IV reads: “[At twenty] leagues they broke bread, [at] thirty leagues they pitched camp [fifty] leagues they travelled in the course of a day,” (IV. 1-3, p. ). The ending lines both utilize and break this pattern, reading: “At twenty leagues they broke bread, at thirty leagues they stopped for the night,” (XI. 319-320, p. ). The use of this repetition sets up the return to Uruk as a backtrack, an undoing of what was just done, and this further emphasizes Gilgamesh’s feeling of fruitlessness that has already been established when he fails to triumph over his mortality. In addition, the change from using “pitched camp” to “stopped for the night” suggests to the reader a feeling of finality within the last few lines. The repetition in the epic helps the reader identify the subtle changes in the text that point to the important growth in Gilgamesh’s character, like his growing distaste for adventure and more mature values. While Uruk itself never physically changes in Gilgamesh’s absence, it is as if he returns to a completely new and different city.
The king’s viewpoint of the city has developed and matured so as Gilgamesh comes home, he finds the unchanged Uruk born again in his eyes. The city, magnificent in both size and architecture, once an extension and a declaration of Gilgamesh’s kingly power is now a separate entity worthy of his pride and respect. This is displayed in the text primarily by a change in speaker. Uruk’s description in the beginning of the epic is in the voice of an unknown and semi-omniscient narrator, but by the ending lines Gilgamesh himself repeats the city’s description to Ur-shanabi the boatman. The reader can almost hear the pride in his words, “O Ur-shanabi, climb Uruk's wall and walk back and forth! Survey its foundations, examine the brickwork! Were its bricks not fired in an oven? Did the Seven Sages not lay its foundations?” (XI. 323-326, p. ). Furthermore, in the beginning of the epic Gilgamesh is credited with the creation of Uruk, “He built the rampart of Uruk-the-Sheepfold, of holy Eanna, the sacred storehouse,” (I. 11-12, p. ), but as the travelers return all mention of Gilgamesh’s dominion is gone as the city has gained its own identity. At the beginning of the epic when Gilgamesh saw Uruk’s greatness as his own, pride for his city was just a way to flatter his considerable ego; but now that Gilgamesh recognizes they are separate beings he can be
proud of Uruk for its own magnificence. This train of thought trends away from tyranny and urges the reader to see Gilgamesh as more of a developed and adult character. Further supporting this idea, the dimensions of the Uruk mentioned in lines 22-24 of the first tablet are used to establish the greatness of the city and its ruler, but in the closing lines, once the city is free of its tyrant, the dimensions now serve as a calming nod back to the beginning of the epic. They tie the story together and provide the reader with a feeling of serenity. As promised within the opening lines, the city, as well as its king, have found peace. As Gilgamesh gains wisdom and maturity he can better appreciate Uruk as a city and is transformed into a better, less tyrannical, ruler. In his quest for immortality Gilgamesh unwittingly develops out of his self absorbed adolescence. Gilgamesh refocuses his interests on adult subject matter, and grows less interested in wandering the country fighting monsters. He also gains a healthy, respectful pride for his kingdom and finds both wisdom and peace. The change in Gilgamesh, emphasized by poetic repetition, from the beginning to the end of the epic is a dramatic one. Ultimately Gilgamesh matures into a more adult character. The unfortunate consequence of this growth is that in his maturation Gilgamesh takes one step closer to the inevitable bookend of his death. This further emphasizes the futility of trying to live forever. Gilgamesh in his struggle to overcome his own mortality has only moved himself closer to death. The irony of this situation is not unique to The Epic of Gilgamesh, it follows the same struggle that everyone goes through as they grow up. This resonance is, at least in part, why many Bildungsroman-esque works such as the Epic of Gilgamesh are as popular and widely read as they are today. The Epic of Gilgamesh offers its reader many interesting insights on the human experience, commentary on not just creation and death, but also aging, and what it means to grow up.
The Epic of Gilgamesh. Trans. Benjamin R. Foster. Text. Martin Puncher. New York: W.W and Company, 2013.Print.
In many literary works we see significant transitions in the hero's character as the story is developed. This is also true in the Epic of Gilgamesh with its hero, Gilgamesh. In this narrative poem, we get glimpses of who Gilgamesh is and what his purposes and goals are. We see Gilgamesh act in many different ways -- as an overbearing ruler resented by his people, a courageous and strong fighter, a deflated, depressed man, and finally as a man who seems content with what he's accomplished. Through all of these transitions, we see Gilgamesh's attitude toward life change. The goals he has for his own life alter dramatically, and it is in these goals that we see Gilgamesh's transition from being a shallow, ruthless ruler to being an introspective, content man.
“Once upon a time in a far away land” in every imagination, is the start of how a prince and a princess live happily ever after. The fairy tales come to mind when thinking about princes, how charming, intelligent admiring, and many more characteristics that the “idyllic” prince has in many minds like my own. The question is simply asked, “What makes the idyllic prince?” most of us think of someone who has high quality and very first class. Niccolo Machiavelli describes an ideal prince as someone who is in control and dominant. The ideal prince should understand warfare and statecraft. Machiavelli was born in Florence Italy in 1496. He served as an administrator and a diplomat in the Florence Republic, and was imprisoned at various points of his career. One of his notable positions was serving as a political advisor to the Borgia family. He knew many political leaders of Italy, particularly Cesare Borgia, who he wrote The Prince about. Machiavelli judges Gilgamesh as a prince based on his behavior, qualities, and characteristics that Machiavelli describes in The Prince and the behavio...
Perhaps one of the main reasons the Epic of Gilgamesh is so popular and has lasted such a long time, is because it offers insight into the human concerns of people four thousand years ago, many of which are still relevant today. Some of these human concerns found in the book that are still applicable today include: the fear and concerns people have in relation to death, overwhelming desires to be immortal, and the impact a friendship has on a person’s life. It does not take a great deal of insight into The Epic of Gilgamesh for a person to locate these themes in the story, and even less introspection to relate to them.
The epic yarn Gilgamesh leaves me somewhat discouraged when I finished the book. This pessimistic ending is not the happy ending I was expecting to see considering the tragedies throughout of the rest of the story. The entire last part of the book, starting with Enkidu’s death, is nothing but more sorrow for Gilgamesh. The book seems to give Gilgamesh hope and then beat him down with more tragedy. It is almost as if the more he tries, the worse it gets for him.
Character is built in several different ways. Some may view character as how one handles a certain hectic situation or how well one person treats another. A true definition character contains these elements, but one’s character is built and developed mainly on how one picks and chooses his time to act and his time to wait. This definition refers to restraint and discipline. Gilgamesh and Homer’s The Odyssey uses many instances in which the main characters must use incredible restraint to protect not only themselves, but also the ones they care for and love. Although both stories use this theme of self-control and discipline to develop certain personalities, each one tells a different account of how these characters are viewed by their fellow men and women and the rewards that come from showing the traits of restraint and self-will. In Gilgamesh, the character that holds back and exhibits patience is viewed as a coward, as Gilgamesh believes, and is a sign of a lack of bravery and confidence. The way that patience is portrayed in Gilgamesh reflects how the society of the time feels about everything in their lives. The author of this story wants the reader to believe that one must not hesitate and must act decisively and quickly. Opposing this belief, Odysseus holds back emotions of rage and homesickness in order to complete the task at hand. Homer, living in Greek society, understood that his people thought more about the problem before coming to a quick conclusion and then acting on it impulsively. So, although both stories repeat the concepts of self-restraint and discipline as character building qualities, they differ in the way that these attributes build or weaken a personality.
Gilgamesh is an epic of great love, followed by lingering grief that causes a significant change in character. It is the story of a person who is feared and honored, a person who loves and hates, a person who wins and loses and a person who lives life. Gilgamesh's journey is larger than life, yet ends so commonly with death. Through Gilgamesh, the fate of mankind is revealed, and the inevitable factor of change is expressed.
Every culture has a different story of their origin. Each story varies in setting, main characters, and religious aspects. Although the stories are different, the sole purpose is the same for each – to explain how each civilization came to be. In order for a civilization to fully understand their past, they must critically break down the components of their origin story. Creation stories establish appropriate relationships within society by the revelation of the punishment laid out by the gods on unsatisfactory vassals, the importance of a hero figure, and the exposure of human survival based on nature.
Myths have been a great example of the hero’s journey. Many heroes have journeys and trials to face throughout their life. Most of their journeys start out with their origin and end with the return. However, the hero’s role remains identical to every other hero. Most heroes like Gilgamesh has heroic traits because of the stages in the hero's journey. Gilgamesh is a man who can turn into a hero by changing himself, even when he has unusual circumstances surrounding his birth. Gilgamesh is viewed as a hero due to the stages of the hero's journey.
The first half of this epic enables the reader to observe Gilgamesh struggling to make a name for himself and to reach immortality. In the final half Gilgamesh attempts to drive his immortality through questioning others. Gilgamesh first attempts to find his purpose on his own, but failing in that effort turns to others for it. In clear contrast the first and second halves of this epic convey the universal truth that happiness, meaning and purpose to ones life are found internally, not externally. But we must not forget that the story of Gilgamesh is a common one. How often does man look externally for happiness when it is best found within? Meaning in life more often comes from what one has done with that life, and how that life has affected the lives of those about us. The journey of discovering oneself and one"'"s values is not in achieving immortality, but is in life well lived.
Gilgamesh, feeling the fear of his own mortality, sets out on a journey to search for a way to preserve himself. Although the journey that he endures is much larger than life, Gilgamesh comes to realize that he can never achieve immortality. Before the creation of Enkidu, Gilgamesh is a man without an equal match. He is an individual with overwhelming power, and it is because of this that makes Gilgamesh a very arrogant person.
We learn about ancient civilizations through literature, artifacts, and stories passed down from generation to generation. The Mesopotamian civilization is one of earth's earliest civilizations, and it's also one we know very little about. We can gather information about these people's way life, beliefs, and geographical location. The Epic of Gilgamesh, a literary work from this time period, shows us several important pieces of information that helps us understand this ancient civilization. This epic shows us the Mesopotamian peoples belief system, their views on death, and their description of the after life.
The stories of the hunt for immortality gathered in the Epic of Gilgamesh depict the conflict felt in ancient Sumer. As urbanization swept Mesopotamia, the social status shifted from a nomadic hunting society to that of a static agricultural gathering society. In the midst of this ancient "renaissance", man found his relationship with the sacred uncertain and precarious. The Epic portrays the strife created between ontological nostalgia for a simpler time and the dawn of civilization breaking in the Near East. In this Epic, Gilgamesh is seen trying to achieve immortality through the methods of both the old and the new. His journeys through the sacred and the profane in many ways characterize the confusion arising from the unstable social climate. Therefore, the society, by writing the story of Gilgamesh, guarantees not only his immortality, but the immortality of the new order being established.
The Epic of Gilgamesh is a moving tale of the friendship between Gilgamesh, the demigod king of Uruk, and the wild man Enkidu. Accepting ones own mortality is the overarching theme of the epic as Gilgamesh and Enkidu find their highest purpose in the pursuit of eternal life.
The Epic of Gilgamesh and The Odyssey both are held in high respect by literature analysts and historians alike for the characterization of the hero and his companion, the imagery brought to mind when one of them is read, and the impressive length in relation to the time period it was written in. The similarities that these two epics share do not end with only those three; in fact, the comparability of these works extend to even the information on the author and the archetypes used. However, The Odyssey and The Epic of Gilgamesh contrast from one another in their writing styles, character details, and main ideas. Both epics weave together a story of a lost man who must find his way, but the path of their stories contrast from one another.