Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay of ozone layer
Environmental Risk Perception Ozone Hole Diminishing This article states that the ozone hole is diminishing. The credit for this good news is the phasing out of the ozone-depleting chemicals sponsored by the Montreal Protocol (Ozone hole diminishing, Nov). According to this article, the hole reached a peak of 25 million square kilometers, coming down from 28 in previous years since 1998 up to 2006. The article emphasizes the fact that ozone-depleting gases are still being used. The article continues by stating that according to the World Meteorological Organization, the planet will come back to pre-ozone hole conditions between 2060 and 2075 (Ozone hole diminishing, Nov). Chemists poke holes in ozone theory The article states experimental data has the potential to “shatter” the current belief system regarding ozone depletion (Schiermeier, 2007). The shattering may go all the way up to how scientists and ultimately the laymen understands the ozone hole formation occurs and the connection to changes in climate. The Montreal Protocol has been a big plus in how the hole may be managed, but the effects of those years freely using CFCs will still linger in the atmosphere for decades to come (Schiermeier, 2007). Interaction of CFCs and the sun rays are complex, but chemists at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California are relying on the new measurements to cast doubt on how the understanding of ozone holes are flawed. After experiments with a new photolysis rate applied to a chemical model of ozone depletion they found that 60% of ozone destruction at the poles has to do with anything else, but CFCs. The new finding is being tested by other researchers, but the possibility of the idea held for so long that ... ... middle of paper ... ..., that fear increases risk perception and anger reduces it (p. 21). Fear has kept us in the dark about the most important issues in our planet. Fear has kept us in our toes way too much time. Now I hope that the anger coming from the emergence of the truth about ozone layer and global warming not just make our specie to reduce risk perception by being angry about the lies, but to actually make sure the people who cause this unnecessary fear be held accountable. Works Cited Steg, L., Van Den Berg, A. E., & De Groot, J. M. (2013). Environmental psychology: An introduction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. Ozone hole diminishing. (2007, Nov). Australasian Science, 28, 13. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/223695918?accountid=458 Schiermeier, Q. (2007). Chemists poke holes in ozone theory. Nature, 449(7161), 382-3. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/449382a
Michael Crichton was an amazing novelist who penned numerous literary works that has impacted today’s societies. In his book, State of Fear, an eBook extra presents a speech given by him called, Why Speculate? Aspects of this speech show the reader that he disapproves of the ways that the media speculates and creates a public that is misinformed about the events of the world. Upon further elaboration, the reader can become aware that Michael Crichton is a critic of global warming, and believes it is nothing more than media speculation. The key idea of the book was the debate of global warming and bioterrorism. Global warming and the emission of greenhouse gases is a concept heavily found in the curriculum, as a student analyzes how different
The World of Psychology. (2002). A Pearson Education Company. Boston, MA: Samuel Wood & Ellen Green Wood p. 593
...d man-environment interactions. . Informally published manuscript, Students' Store, University of California at Los Angeles, Angeles CA, .
This essay discusses the role of ecological validity in psychological research and pointing out the importance of it. I will also be demonstrating a balanced view on the points in favour and those against the claim that ecological validity is important in psychological research drawing on the material from previous research.
...nd by our position. However, the battle against global warming, GMOs and DDT alarmism is unfortunately far from the end. The alarmist environmental movements have been endorsing these swindles for many years that include some influential groups in the government, science, business and liberal media. Up to this point, the majority of the debates were based on predictions and now we are at the point where the actual facts are showing that the predictions are incorrect. The real picture of these debatable topics are becoming more clear and unless something major occurs in the near future it is going to be difficult for the environmental groups to continue to support their untruthful stories. Solomon’s article proves that today’s governments that used to support the idea of global warming are reconsidering their position and aiming to steer in a different direction.
Davis, S. F., & Palladino, J. J. (2003). Psychology. (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hutchison, E. D. (2017). Essentials of human behavior: integrating person, environment, and the life course. Los Angeles:
...son, E. D. (2008). Dimensions of Human Behaviour: Person and Environment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stratospheric ozone absorbs 97-99% of ultraviolet radiation. As this protective layer continues to dissentigrate, human health will suffer. One American dies every hour from skin cancer, a direct result of ozone depletion by anthropogenic chemicals, primarily CFCs, which damage the ozone layer. Alternate chemicals are now being used in the place of CFCs that will not damage statospheric ozone, and there is international recognition of the importance of developing these chemicals. The Montreal Protocol is an international treaty which limits the production of ozone depleting substances. Still, human health is at risk from the deletion of ozone, and the risk factor will continue to rise unless people and industries become more aware of the implications connected with everyday use of chemicals which destroy stratospheric ozone.
The behavioural perspective to psychology’s assumptions are that all behaviours are learnt from the environment. The environment is made up of many aspects such as housing, local amenities, financial stability and education, these factors that influence are known as environmental determinism.
...depletion of the ozone layer, biodiversity and stress on food producing systems(IPCC 2013). Therefore, climate change is highly risky and the appropriate international steps should be taken in order to stop more climate change and its negative and severe consequences.
Ciccarelli, Saundra, and White, J. Noland. Psychology Second Edition. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc. 2009. Print.
So what is the big deal? The problem, and the reason why this concept instills fear directly into the core of scientists, is the rate at which, over the past 1,300 years, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels have risen. This unnatural increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide, due to the immense amount of anthropogenic burning of oil and coal, affects the transfer of infrared energy through the atmosphere, leading us to the phenomenon of global warming. 1). 61). The aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid aforesaid afore Moreover, it can also be seen “as presenting us with the largest collective action problem that humanity has ever faced, one that has both intra- and inter-generational dimensions” (Jamieson pg. 61).
Imagine? One day you wake up and all you can see and smell is smoke. Do you think this will be good for you? Good for our planet?. However, even though some people believe greenhouse gases have nothing to do with climate change, people should take more responsibility for the planet because the deforestation of land and the burning of fossil fuels is the principle cause of climate change. The warming that is evident is the instrumental temperature record is consistent with a wide range of observations, as documented by many independent scientific groups. The climate system can warm or cool in response to changes in external forces. Therefore, some scientist say that human generated greenhouse gas emission is too small to substantially change
The Environmentalists claim the science is settled, and that any actions taken to prove otherwise will be unfruitful. They do this to turn public attention away from the fact that much of their data is purposely taken out of context, manipulated, or made up in order to prove that Manmade Global Warming exists. In fact, there is more evidence showing that the rise in temperatures may be due to solar activity or part of the Earth’s natural climate fluctuations, than to support that it is caused by greenhouse gases generated by humans.