The emperor and the pope were both at the top of their respected social hierarchy, as figure heads. Whist both the emperor and pope were the figure heads in their class the power that the held was minor they could be known as a nominal leader. This was different to the high expectations that the public thought, they held high and lots of power, but the option or choice to use it was minimal. This choice was normal to most figure heads in this era of time. With what power that they did hold and chose in force, were minor poisons such as, provisions, duties and the were the presence and face of their country. Although their power was little, in both cases the emperor and pope could choose to use their power and control the social class to be and do what they wanted. All the general and political power was passed down through social class. Despite both the Emperor and Pope were figure heads they both held different positions. …show more content…
The role the Emperor and Pope were in fact quite different, despite the general out look of an nominal Figure head and leader.
As a leader the Pope in medieval Europe was a religious leader whom, was a ruler main governing body of the Catholic Church, and each Pope was the ruler of his country or estate. The Pope ensured all that the Catholic Church didn't descend down into chaos, and the Kings tried to maintain control over their subjects and lower class. The Pope was also feared has he was the head of the Catholic Church and was feared they would be implaced into hell, in which in this time was a highly feared place. The Emperor was a leader who was a feudal character of the Japanese society who created a situation in which control of the country, and the emperor remained in his place as a symbol of sovereignty behind the shogun. The in Shogunate Japan was known as royalty, to the people below him. Although there were minor similarities between the role of the Emperor and the Pope differences heavily outweighed
them. In the Medieval ages and Shogunate Japan they both had warriors, whom abided by a code. The warriors in both Medievel Europe and Shogunate japan both had a set of codes in which they abided by to full live out their live as full as they could as warrior, these codes let them reach their full potential, this governed their life and couldn’t do much different. These codes often consisted of strict training, honour and discipline. The training that they do behind the scenes is extreme. How well they trained and their fitness would determine their rank or type of warrior that that they were for example,Front line, middle. Although the warriors in both Shogunate Japan and Medieval Europe were the same the more detailed regions and codes are different. The warriors in Shougunate Japan and Medieval Europe were much the same as different. The warriors of Shogunate Japan abided by a code of Bushido, and the warriors in Medieval Europe abided by a code of chlvarlvy. Bushido was the code of conduct followed by the Janpanese Samurai Warriors. The principles of Bushido strongly emphasised honor, justice, courage, benevolence or mercy, politeness, honesty and sincerity, loyalty, self control and above all others was the loyalty to a warriors Matter. One of the rules that is followed by a Samurai is when being defeated the Samurai die with honor rather than falling into the hands of the enemies. These are just some of the codes that the Samurai warriors had to abide by. Unlike the code of Bushido the Chivalry was more of a social code of knightly hood. Chivalry in Medieval Europe was referred to as a knights idealised life and his manners while among his court. Although there were similarities and differences between the warriors of Shogunate Japan and Medieval Europe the differences out weighed the similarities. Shogunate Japan and Medieval Europe both had a feadual system. Both of these systems had principe differences and similarities within them. Some of the similarities were, the Pope of Medieval Europe and the Emperor of Shogunate Japan but this also had it’s difference the Pope was a religious figurehead whereas the Emperor was a political figure head. Another similarity was that in both Shogunate Japan and Medieval Europe there was a social class which was constructed of warriors whom followed a code of honour, this also had a difference in Shogunate Japan their warriors had to abide by code of Bushido and in Medieval Europe their warriors abided by a code of Chivalry.
The Pope has agreed to help defend the Byzantine Empire! After being appealed to by Emperor Alexius I Comnenus, in 1095, Pope Urban II assembled the Council of Clermont. In order to help the Byzantine Empire and ensure his power over the church he has decided to call for a military expedition to get back the Holy Land.
Tokugawa Japan and the Ming Dynasty are both very similar. For centuries Japan and China have shared their differences through their customs and traditions, but also share commonly a few similarities.They both share a unique history whether it’s technology, uniform or how they constructed their country to what it is today. There will be comparing and contrasting between Tokugawa Japan and the Ming dynasty, which through this essay marking the key topics of government, economy and religion.
...th wore helmets, armor, and worked for their leader, the shoguns or daimyo for the samurai, and for the knights their lord(s). Lastly, they both had peasants. The peasants both had to pay their taxes and had no power. Feudal Japan and Feudal Europe both had a certain social class order for power and how the people lived and worked.
Pope Urban II was sought by Alexius Comnenus, a Byzantine Emperor who wanted the papacy to help his army hold off the advancing Seljuk Turks in Asia Minor. The reason for Alexius Comnenus contacting the pope rather than another emperor or monarch wasn’t just the fact they were secular, but because the pope would have more power to persuade the people. The Gregorian movement in 1050-80 was ultimately was responsible for the new instilled power of the papacy’s position over nonreligious rulers. The pope agreed to aid the Byzantine emperor, but he also had his own agenda when it came to the military advances and the new power of his position. The papacy did not intend to only help the Byzantine Empire but to further save all of Christendom from being overrun.
The Pope is the Bishop of Rome and the leader of the Catholic Church. This is something that started right after the death of Jesus. When Jesus resurrected, he said to St. Peter, “Feed my lambs.... Tend my sheep.... Feed my sheep.” This command given to Peter made him the head of the apostles, henceforth, making him the first Pope. Peter would rule for approximately 34 years, and when he died he was succeeded by St. Linus. The tradition of serving as Pope until death was started by Peter and has been carried on for centuries. Since Peter, there have been 264 Popes and very few have not stayed in power until their death. Most recently, and most commonly known, is Pope Benedict XVI. As the successor of John Paul II, Benedict chose to step down due to old age. Despite this, Pope Benedict did great things during his papacy.
The rise of power for Charlemagne was initially a hereditary right, but he used that as a stepping stone to become the most well-known king of all time. The story really begins with the father of Charles, Pepin. The position of mayor of the palace was given to both Pepin and his brother Carloman, who worked together in “splendid harmony.” (137) But after a few years Carloman decided to join the monks and lead a monastery life leaving only Pepin to be the mayor of the palace. Then Pope Zacharias decided that the mayor of the palace, Pepin, deserved to be King due to his influence among his people. While king, he waged war against Waifar, duke of Aquitaine, and this lasted for nine years, by the end of while Pepin died. This left the kingdom to be equally divided among both Charles and Carloman. Charles took up the kingdom of his father, while Carloman took the kingdom of his uncle. There was a lot o...
The top structure of the society includes the Shoguns, Daimyos and Samurais. ‘Shogun’ was the title granted by the Emperor to Japan’s top military commander (Web-japan.org, 2013). Initially Emperors controlled the country but over time Shoguns became more powerful than the Emperor and took over the whole government, the Shogun was generally the real ruler of the country until 1867 when feudalism was abolished (Web-japan.org, 2013). Daimyos were the lords and their roles were to manage and maintain the law, collect taxes and aiding in armed forces for the Shogun (Ask.com, 2013). Samurais were the members of the military class, they were the warriors of traditional Japan. The roles of the Samurais were to protect and serve their daimyos or lords usually in wars (Answers.yahoo.com, 2013).
Upon evaluating each empire, there are likings between both the Carolingian Empire and the Roman Empire, along with their leaders, Charlemagne and Augustus. Both leaders in their own veneration were experienced military men with dexterity in engaging in war to expand their sway and authority. Each had attained an abundance of land at the beginning of their sovereignty, and during their walk of life had exponentially accumulated an extensive empire. The crucial variance that permitted the Roman Empire to continue to withstand itself was the supervision of the
The five good emperors’ goodness was determined by their relationships with the Roman Senate and people as well as the positive contributions that they achieved for the empire as a whole. They each provided their own way of running the empire and despite the majority of the emperors only able to maintain one of the above qualities, they were able to do a very good job in that one aspect
As a result these products became available in the marketplace and common in people's homes. The emperor's power came from his control of the military, wich was exceedingly large. Under him was his chief deputy, who would communicate with the gods and relate the gods wishes to the Emperor.
powerful institution. The way in which the society functioned, all revolved around the church. Rome no longer had an emperor but in the hearts of the individuals Jesus Christ was the new emperor. The Spanish Inquisition was used by the Catholic Church ...
Augustus created the office of emperor with the Augustan Principate, which was “to have no institutionalized authoritarian power, no perpetual dictatorship such as Julius Caesar had had himself voted early in 44, or anything like it (Stockton, 124).” Despite his wishes the people of Rome ended up giving Augustus eternal office, and powers to control the Senate with the rights to dictate agendas and veto (Stockton, 128). The people of Rome had created a position of absolute power, the exact thing Augustus was attempting to prevent. At the time the people of Rome could not have realized what they were creating in the office of emperor, for Augustus was a great man whose leadership created a great shadow over the shoulder of any future emperor.
The Emperor of the Aztec empire was the person at the top of the Aztec hierarchy, and was given a title, "Huey Tlatoani", which means "Great Speaker". The emperor's role was not hereditary-that is, he was not born into it only because of his family, and with enough effort, any person could become the emperor. He was chosen by the nobility, often for his qualities (such as being a good strategist, etc.). Once he was chosen, he became the most powerful person in the empire. Though his subjects knew that he was mortal, he was considered to be the closest to the gods (without actually being one), so they treated him like one. Thus, his orders were never questioned. He lived in a gigantic palace(44), and was given all possible luxuries and privileges. When he had to travel through the city, he was carried on a screened platform, that was covered in ocelot skins, by servants(45). Even the streets were cleared for him(46). However, the emperor also had important roles in Aztec society. He was responsible for being the chief priest, the commander-in-chief of the Aztec Army, and the head of state. As the chief priest, the emperor needed to attend religious ceremonies. His responsibility for being the commander in chief of the army meant that the emperor had to be a skilled warrior, and a capable strategist. He had to know how to lead others, and how to be successful and victorious in battle. The emperor also had to make important decisions that...
First, there were the ordinary believers, the citizens of the kingdom who followed the Christian faith. Then there was the clergy, the members who devoted their lives to the church. Each group of the clergy was assigned specific functions by the clergy nobles to help run the Church competently. Amongst all the clergy associates, the Pope was at the top, he had the equivalent if not more power than the ruling monarch and was in charge of all political affairs and administered the clergy. He was able to dictate political laws and even comment on the monarch’s decisions.
Perhaps no other event was as influential to the rise of papacy in Rome as the decline of the Roman empire. With the decline of the empire, the church became the last refuge of stability. Without the protection of the empire, Rome was subject to poverty, disrepair, and attack from enemies.1 The rise of the papacy was a response to this situation. It was further cemented by the leadership of such men as Leo I and Gregory I, the latter sometimes referred to as the father of the medieval papacy.2 Finally, the granting of lands and authority to the bishop of Rome greatly increased the power of the Roman church.3