The Economics of Eminent Domain Eminent domain is defined as the right of the government to take private property for public use, with the payment of compensation to land owners. Laws surrounding this subject have become more controversial of late, as many feel as though they’re not being paid their fair share for their land and that these government projects have not been beneficial to the U.S. economy. However, projects made possible through eminent domain have had a variety of effects on not only the national economy, but also personal finances. Eminent Domain can definitely be beneficial to the economy. Eminent domain is most often used to develop roads/ transportation routes, build public buildings, establish national parks, etc. …show more content…
(US Department of Justice). If these projects are successful and frequently used/visited they can create jobs and increase tax revenue. For example: The creation of a highway could allow the collection of tolls, as well as the creation of new jobs as toll-collectors. Therefore, the use of eminent domain can be extremely useful in poorer regions with low unemployment rates. A great example of this comes from Village West in Kansas City. Using eminent domain, the city was able to acquire land from two uncooperative landowners. Now, on the four hundred acre land sits 146 homes and six different businesses. This development resulted in the creation of 3500 new jobs and nearly 6 million dollars in yearly revenue. (Cooksey 12). Without the use of eminent domain, however, the two property holders would’ve kept their land, and this beneficial development would’ve never happened. One the other hand, eminent domain projects have also had some economic downfalls.
There have been multiple cases where the development of some projects, predicted to be profitable, led to economic damage. For example, in the 1981 case Poletown Neighborhood Council vs. City of Detroit, The Michigan Supreme court allowed the use of eminent domain to evict 4200 people, demolish 140 homes, 6 churches, a hospital, and multiple non-profit organizations from their neighborhood in Detroit. Built in its place, was a General Motors automobile plant, meant to provide 6000 new jobs to the area. However, only around 2500 people ended up being employed a net loss of jobs in the area. (Cooksey 15). Therefore, due to lack of revenue being collected, the failure of an eminent domain project can result in the government/ a government agency becoming further in debt and wasting tax payer money on demolition and construction. Furthermore, thousands of predicted jobs are no longer realistic, resulting in an increase in that areas unemployment …show more content…
rate. A majority of the controversy surrounding eminent domain, however, is compensation received by those handing over their land.
The fifth amendment of the US constitution states that the government can purchase land from private owners, however the owners must be paid justly (Philadelphia Convention V). However, while the government may have granted the property owners a fair price for their land, the expenses of relocating and actually finding another home are not considered. Also, there is a fairly common trend the government uses when it takes land with eminent domain. A project is announced, then years later, when property prices are low, the government goes and buys all the land for said project; not giving property owners their fair share of money (just compensation). Though not affecting the economy as a whole, this unfair lack of compensation is affecting peoples’ personal
finances. In conclusion, when working of on eminent domain projects, the government should be aware/ take precautions to ensure that it is as economically beneficial as possible. For one, any government agency should do background research on the community in which their project takes place. A town that is thriving and has a low unemployment rate will likely not benefit from the demolition of their land and the replacements of “better jobs”, like in Poletown Neighborhood Council vs. The City of Detroit. And secondly: the government should buy the land they need for a project when the project is actually announced. That way, property owners can know that they’re getting just compensation. Not only that, but people in the future being approached by the government for their land will be more confident that they’re getting a fair price, making it easier and less complicated for the government to get land that it needs.
Iceland recognizes the issue of eminent domain, as they have had trouble with this in regards to geothermal deposits. However, they agree with the ECHR regarding rights to fair compensation. Governments should only take property if it will benefit the public as a whole.
The Land Reform Act of 1967 permitted the state of Hawaii to redistribute land by condemning and acquiring private property from landlords (the lessors) in order to sell it to another private owner, in this case, their tenants (the lessees). The Hawaii State Legislature passed the Land Reform Act after discovering that nearly forty-seven percent (47%) of the state was owned by only seventy-two (72) private land owners. That meant that only forty-nine percent of Hawaii was owned by the State and Federal Govermnet.The contested statute gave lessees of single family homes the right to invoke the government's power of eminent domain to purchase the property that they leased, even if the landowner objected. The challengers of the statue (the land owners) claimed that such a condemnation was not a taking for public use because the property, once condemned by the state, was promptly turned over to the lessee (a private ...
To stimulate growth inland, the Homestead Act was initiated. Many traveled overland by horse and wagon on rutted trails and grassland to find a plot of 160 acres of undeveloped land. They were granted title to the land if they “improved” the plot by building a dwelling and cultivating the land. After five years on the land, farmers were entitled to the property, free and clear.
For around three cents per acre, 15 million in total, the land would have been as if one was giving land away in modern days. But even when the purchase was made, it was a steal. But this is exactly what was needed, land, and more land. A place to grow larger, somewhere to call ours. But even then that we bought the land, we did not know what was upon the land. To even have any knowledge of what was in the land, there were ones who were paid to be sent out to see what the land had to offer us. This was a very scary risk for him as he didn’t know if the land would have anything to offer. Though these peoples main purpose was to map out the land for it to be sent out. But if anything were to come up wrong in the purchase, Jefferson’s reputation would be ruined. Not only would they think that his opinions were useless, but he would no longer be a man anyone will
Such power could allow cities to favor special interest groups or large corporations. It could be said, the Supreme Court’s decision concludes that there are no restraints a city must consider when taking for economic development and this creates a reasonable potential for abuse. Cities can claim that without eminent domain they cannot accomplish improvements or worthwhile projects within their communities. Many areas in which eminent domain is used are in low income neighborhoods. It is tremendously difficult for individuals in these areas to pay legal fees to fight cities from condemning their properties. Uprooting families, elderly and destroying small businesses is not a means for economic
The 19th century set the stage for different policies that lead to the extending of America’s power, which is defined as imperialism. Imperialism started for different reasons like the Americans wanting the U.S. to expand or explore the unknown land, or even some feared existing resources in U.S. might eventually dry up. The reason imperialism started doesn’t really matter, but more of what it caused. Imperialism lead to Cuban assistance, the addition of Hawaii and Alaska to America, and Yellow Journalism.
The Homestead Steel Strike occurred in June of 1892. The strike took place in Homestead Pennsylvania and involved the Carnegie Steel Company and the Amalgamated Association of Iron and Steen Workers (the AA). The Leader of Carnegie Steel Company was Mr. Andrew Carnegie. His company produced such cheep materials that creations like bridges and skyscrapers were not only feasible but affordable. He was creating a revolutionary period for steel and iron factories. The Amalgamated Association was an American labor union formed in 1876 to represent iron and steel workers. They were a new type of union for the time period and they planned on making great movements to help their workers. While in the beginning, the relationship
There have been many controversial laws passed throughout American history that have been a source of outrage across the nation, but one of the arguably most controversial acts made into law is known as the Dawes Act. During the time that this Act was considered by the American government, racial tensions were high against the American people and the Native Americans due to the hunger for land preoccupied by the Natives. Senator Henry Dawes proposed a bill that he and his supporters believed would help reduce tensions and assimilate the supposed savages into what was believed to be a more civilized way of life. The proposed solution was to dissolve the Indian reservations and divide the land among the Indians to give them a way to provide
On May 20th of 1862, President Abraham Lincoln signed, and put into effect, the Homestead Act of 1862. The Homestead Act opened up more than half a million square miles in the Western half the the United States during the Civil War. The Homestead Act was a major turning point in American History. It was a huge milestone for American history because its consequences included implications during the Civil War, but also paved the way for westward expansion within the United States.
Another example to demonstrate why some of the land was taken unlawfully was signing of the Tierra Maria Grant. This grant sold a large amount of land that belonged to many heirs, however, the grant
The Anti-Federalists were not in favor of ratifying the new Constitution. Some Anti-Federalists wanted to keep the Articles of Confederation, others wanted to add some things and change some things in the new Constitution before they agreed to ratify it. Some very important Anti-Federalist’s were Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Richard Henry Lee. Anti-Federalists tended to be poorer and in lower classes than the Federalists. These people feared a central government and were afraid that the government proposed by the new Constitution could easily turn into a tyranny. The Federalists argued that the United States needed a strong central government in order to stand a chance against foreign powers, amongst other reasons that were all beneficial
The Declaration of Independence, written by Thomas Jefferson (with the help of Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, as well as many others), was signed on July 1st, 1776 in Philadelphia. Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence to appeal to the British Parliament and King and explain why the American Colonies wanted independence from England. Thomas Jefferson and the other delegates from the Second Continental Congress agreed that, “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator certain unalienable rights” (p. 112) which became the base for nearly all of the points made in the document. Logical and emotional statements were used throughout the document to make impactful statements that would convince the audience of the seriousness of the matters they were presenting.
In the United States we face many issues such as poverty, death, health, and many others. But the issue that is currently effecting society the most is foreclosure. What is foreclosure? How has it effected society?. The definition of foreclosure is a legal or professional proceeding held by a lien holder which is a court order termination of equitable right of redemption amongst housing properties. Foreclosure has not just effected us financially, but has effected society physically.
Foner, Eric, and John A. Garraty. "Homestead Act." The Reader's Companion to American History. Dec. 1 1991: n.p. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 06 Feb. 2014.
A contract is an agreement between two parties in which one party agrees to perform some actions in return of some consideration. These promises are legally binding. The contract can be for exchange of goods, services, property and so on. A contract can be oral as well as written and also it can be part oral and part written but it is useful to have written contract otherwise issues can be created in future. But both the written as well as oral contract is legally enforceable. Also if there is a breach of contract, there are certain remedies for that which are discussed later in the assignment. There are certain elements which need to be present in a contract. These elements are discussed in the detail in the assignment. (Clarke,