Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical analysis of Emily Dickinson work
Critical analysis of Emily Dickinson work
Discuss the style of Emily Dickinson
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical analysis of Emily Dickinson work
Throughout history society has depicted the “outsider” as the non-conformist. This non-conformist persona usually has negative attributes attached to it, therefore, no one wants to be correlated with it. For this reason, it is believed that the non-conformist poses danger to society because they may cause a collapse in its structure. Yet, a “mad” society meaning a society that poses danger to the outsider creates justification to their non conformity. In Emily Dickinson’s poem “Much Madness is Divinest Sense” she demonstrates how a “mad” society causes destruction on the non-conformist. To truly understand this “mad” society Dickinson refers to, one has to understand the society in which Emily lived in. In one sense, Emily is defending her …show more content…
own position as an independent woman in a patriarchal society. During the 1800s, society was a one sided power dynamic, which consisted of men, and women were expected to satisfy the men. In comparison to Dickinson’s poem, being that she was an active champion of defying gender stereotypes, the mad society she refers to can be correlated to the patriarchal environment she lived in. She acclaims, “Tis the Majority- / In this, as all, prevail” (4-5) Dickinson implies that the majority rules when she mentions “as all, prevail” (5), which can be a correlation with the patriarchal society. This means that since the majority rules they are able to set all the standards in society, which allows them to prevail, or in regards to her previous lines, it is the majority who is “sane” because they comply to the standards. This state of mind poses danger to those who defy the “sane” patriarchal society because as she states later on, those who “demur,” which means those who defy are deemed “straightaway dangerous- / And handled with a Chain” (7-8). This clearly proves that the majority is “mad” and poses danger because a non-conformist person, is reduced to a wild animal who needs to be “handled with a chain.” Thus, this type of destructive treatment affects a person, but is also shown in Dickinson’s style of writing. In the first few lines, Dickinson presents a clear consequence of how the “mad” society has affected a non-conformist, such as herself.
As a result, this consequence is shown through the break in the meter of the poem. The meter of every line in “Much Madness is Divinest Sense” uses iambic tetrameter, yet Dickinson destroys the meter of her poem on the fourth line by using a reversed dactyl. There is no reason to change the meter of the poem, but to express emphasis. In the first line of the poem Dickinson refers to non-conformists by labeling them as “Much madness” (1), but in reality being sane. However, The third line states exactly the opposite. Those who believe they are sane with “much sense,” meaning the society Dickinson lives in is in reality mad as seen when she says “starkest Madness.” Thus, to physically emphasize the destruction a “mad” society has on a non conformist she destroys the meter of the poem with the fourth line, “Tis the Majority” (4). The author is showing that the majority meaning the society who is described as having “much sense” in the previous line, is actually dangerous in the sense that “Tis the Majority” who destroys the the iambic tetrameter thus it is them who are labeled as “starkest madness” (3). Dickinson shows that the society she lives in, who believes they are sane, actually poses a danger to a non-conformist, which makes sense due to the nature of
society. Moreover, Dickinson furthers the notion of destruction when she decides to collapse the poem’s rhyme scheme. “Much Madness is divinest Sense” has a brief rhyme scheme of A B A. One may think that the next line will be B, but it changes to C D E A D. It is quite curious the location in which Emily chooses the collapse of the rhyme scheme to be. The poem is eight lines long and the collapse begins on the fourth line, which states, “Tis the Majority.” It is also interesting to note that the fourth line is the only line in the poem without a dash at the end of the line. One can note that the center of destruction of this poem all converges on the fourth line. It is very likely that Dickinson tries to emphasize the importance that the “majority” has on the destruction of her poem. It seems quite ironic because being that she is the non conformist, this type of style seems to be only natural. Yet, “Tis the Majority” that caused the poem to collapse, so they caused the poem to demur therefore creating them “straightaway dangerous.” Dickinson assented to her style of writing, therefore, she proclaims herself as sane. Dickinson further proves her sanity by defying the norms of a standard poem with the capitalization of words in a non formal way, yet demonstrates the paradox of sanity and madness to illustrate the maddening effects a “mad” society has on the non-conformist. Throughout the poem the author capitalizes certain words breaking grammatical rules such as “Much Madness” (1) or “Much Sense” (3). Dickinson does this to emphasize the irony of the paradox involving madness paired with sanity and sanity with madness. She tries to prove the flaw in the mentality of a society that governs with majority rules. A society that is governed by a “mad” majority such as a patriarchal society Dickinson lived in is bound to develop non-conformist such as herself. Therefore, the maddening effects a “mad” society develops on a non-conformist is to produce paradoxes such as the ones that Dickinson produces on this poem. The poem tries to show that sanity is not justified due to numbers such as the ideology of “majority rules,” instead it is defined by those who have a “discerning eye” (2) meaning those who do not just go along with the majority. Those who are “mad” enough to defy the majority. In today’s society we exclude and isolate those who we believe are “outsider,” yet one does not realize the psychological damage and irony in isolating an outsider. This is why Dickinson chose the majority to be the center of destruction of her entire poem. To show the paradox of isolating and isolated person, which in reality shows the madness of society. Therefore, one should follow what they believe and not the majority and as a result he concept of non-conformism will not be a problem.
This passage displays a tone of the men’s respect and sense of protection toward Emily, which is very different from the other women’s reaction to her death. It also shows the reader that Emily was honorable in the eyes of the men of the town. We have seen this need to protect women throughout history, but in recent years there has been a great decline and it is sad.
Life is sad and tragic; some of which is made for us and some of which we make ourselves. Emily had a hard life. Everything that she loved left her. Her father probably impressed upon her that every man she met was no good for her. The townspeople even state “when her father died, it got about that the house was all that was left to her; and in a way, people were glad…being left alone…She had become humanized” (219). This sounds as if her father’s death was sort of liberation for Emily. In a way it was, she could begin to date and court men of her choice and liking. Her father couldn’t chase them off any more. But then again, did she have the know-how to do this, after all those years of her father’s past actions? It also sounds as if the townspeople thought Emily was above the law because of her high-class stature. Now since the passing of her father she may be like them, a middle class working person. Unfortunately, for Emily she became home bound.
Dickinson refers to “the Majority” as society, this Majority does not take women’s literature seriously. The vast majority of good literature is composed by men and it is extremely rare for a woman to create a masterpiece. Dickinson’s highly unusually writing style was her self-expression at its finest. Her use of capitalization and hyphens was deemed as unnecessary by many, but to her it was completely necessary to express her emphasis. Unfortunately, she was unable to obtain recognition during her lifetime. When her poetry was first published many changes were made so that it would meet the current standards. Little did anyone know that the true strength of her poetry lied within her unique style. Only when her work was published in it’s original form did Dickinson start to receive recognition as a pioneer. Dickinson writes” Assent – and you are sane- Demur – your straightway dangerous – And handled with a Chain –" (Lines 5-7) If one was to conform to standards then they would be considered normal. However, if one strayed away from norms they would be deemed outcasts. “Much Madness is divinest Sense” (line 1) meant that madness was true free thinking and
It is funny and yet tragic to see that no matter where an individual’s geographical location is or for the most part when in history the duration of their lifetime occurred, that they still can share with other tormented individuals the same pain, as a result of the same malignancies plaguing humanity for what seems to have been from the beginning. Emily Dickinson’s poetry, Gustave Flaubert’s Madame Bovary, and Lu Xun’s “Diary of a Madman” all exhibit disgust for their societies, what is particularly interesting however, is that the subject of their complaints are almost identical in nature. This demonstrates how literature really does reflect the attitudes and tribulations the society and or culture endures from which it was written. The grievances that they feel to be of such importance as to base their literary works on are that of traditionalism and, the carnivorous nature of society. Different societies will inevitably produce different restrictive and consuming faces to these problems.
During her descriptions of insanity Dickinson says on lines 13-14 “As all the Heavens were a Bell, /And Being, but an Ear” which is very hard to follow because of the peculiar style of writing she has for this text. She capitalizes at non-proper places and the writing does not flow. Her writing is very radical because she is attempting to be in the shoes of an insane person. While thinking logically an insane person does not have the proper grammar or the ability to think straight. So an insane person’s writing would sound much like ‘I Felt a Funeral in my Brain’ because of the fact that insane people can’t produce technical pieces of art. Also, when at the end of the poem, Dickinson states on lines 15-16 “And I, and Silence, some strange Race, / -Wrecked, solitary, here-“it leaves many readers having to go back and read it again. The words seem to be placed in horrible spots and seem like bad writing. There was a big intention behind writing in these ways. Dickinson has a huge amount of wisdom when it came to this poem and the reason behind everything she did completely put it over the top for the expression of insanity. In actuality, there was a big purpose behind everything Dickinson did with the writing to make it convincing that the character was one hundred percent insane. Although Dickinson did a great job with convincing readers of insanity for the character, some
In a “Rose for Emily”, Faulkner uses Emily’s house as a symbol of the barrier Emily forms between herself and society. As society moves through generations and changes over the years, Emily remains the same, within the borders of her own household. The house is described as “in the heavily lightsome style of the seventies, set on what had once been our most select street”(125), but years passed and more modern houses had “obliterated even the august names of that neighborhood” (125). Faulkner set the house apart from the rest of the neighborhood, and Emily is described in the beginning as “a fallen monument” and a “tradition” indicating that she had not changed in an extended amount of time. The symbol of the house, remaining unchanged through the decades that passed becomes stronger when Emily does not permit tax collectors to pass through the threshold of the house, “She vanquished them, horse and foot, just as she had vanquished their fathers thirty years before”. Emily’s image of a “monument” to the community’s small society caused her to become exempt from the demands of the state that the rest of the population had to adhere to. Emily’s house enab...
As a member of the Christian faith, I find it fairly recognizable on what Emily Dickinson’s views are towards religion. Pessimistic. One of the many adjectives that come to mind when describing her views, especially after reading both poems “Safe in their Alabaster Chambers” & “Some keep the Sabbath”. Poems that touch upon the concept of religion, one viewing the current state of human life and the other, afterlife. Through analysis of both, these two Dickinson 's poems possibly define her overall view upon the disciplined, religious faith. Such views could also perhaps coincide with earlier poet, Walt Whitman, whom also shares some common ideas of faith and God. Therefore it is appropriate to break down each poem, stanza by stanza, to truly understand how she felt about her faith through the poems.
Miss Emily was part of the highly revered Grierson family, the aristocrats of the town. They held themselves to a higher standard, and nothing or nobody was ever good enough for them. Faulkner fist gives us the clue of Emily's mental condition when he refers to Emily's great-aunt, Lady Wyatt. Faulkner tells us that Lady Wyatt had "gone completely crazy" (Faulkner 93). Due to the higher standards they had set for themselves, they believed that they were too high for that and then distanced themselv...
Emily Dickinson is one of the great visionary poets of nineteenth century America. In her lifetime, she composed more poems than most modern Americans will even read in their lifetimes. Dickinson is still praised today, and she continues to be taught in schools, read for pleasure, and studied for research and criticism. Since she stayed inside her house for most of her life, and many of her poems were not discovered until after her death, Dickinson was uninvolved in the publication process of her poetry. This means that every Dickinson poem in print today is just a guess—an assumption of what the author wanted on the page. As a result, Dickinson maintains an aura of mystery as a writer. However, this mystery is often overshadowed by a more prevalent notion of Dickinson as an eccentric recluse or a madwoman. Of course, it is difficult to give one label to Dickinson and expect that label to summarize her entire life. Certainly she was a complex woman who could not accurately be described with one sentence or phrase. Her poems are unique and quite interestingly composed—just looking at them on the page is pleasurable—and it may very well prove useful to examine the author when reading her poems. Understanding Dickinson may lead to a better interpretation of the poems, a better appreciation of her life’s work. What is not useful, however, is reading her poems while looking back at the one sentence summary of Dickinson’s life.
Shynn Felarca Mrs. Cox English Honors-Period 5 Due Date: 20 November 2015 Emily Elizabeth Dickinson A while back there were many poems and poets. Like Emily Elizabeth Dickinson, a romantic poet who put many deep meanings behind her poems, even if her poems were all mostly about death. When she was alive she was an unknown poet, but throughout the years she became well known.
It's also worth keeping in mind that Dickinson was not always consistent in her views and they can change from poems, to poem, depending upon how she felt at a given moment. Dickinson was less interested in absolute answers to questions than she was in examining and exploring their "circumference."
Emily Dickinson was born on December 10th, 1830. She grew up in Amherst, Massachusetts. When she was middle age, she didn’t come out of her house very often; she didn’t even attend her father’s funeral. It was said to be that she was depressed, she had epilepsy, agoraphobia, or social anxiety. She only communicated with her family through letters. In 1884 she fell ill due to kidney failure. Sight is what is produced from your eyes, and what is to vision means to see with your heart. In Before I got my eye put out and We Grow Accustomed to the Dark both have an underlying meaning. Some may perceive it to be literal, and some may see it to be something deeper. These poems both have a deeper meaning, she could have had an accident, lost her vision, and her sight to appreciate being able to see would be a bit understated. Some don’t appreciate what we have until they’ve lost it.
Emily did not enjoy the popularity and excitement of the public life, unlike her father. So she began to pull away from it. In the presence of strangers Emily could be shy, silent or even depreciating. Emily felt that she did not fit in with her and her father’s religion in Amherst especially when he father started to censor the books she read because of their potential to draw her away from faith.
In "Faith"..., Dickinson presents a witty and biting satirical look at Faith and its limitations. While it still amuses readers today, it must be mentioned that this short poem would have had a greater impact and seriousness to an audience from the period Dickinson lived in. Dickinson was raised in a strict Calvinist household and received most of her education in her youth at a boarding school that also followed the American Puritanical tradition she was raised in. In this short, witty piece Dickinson addresses two of the main obsessions of her generation: The pursuit of empirical knowledge through science, faith in an all-knowing, all-powerful Christian god and the debate on which was the more powerful belief. In this poem Dickinson uses humor to ease her position in the debate on to the reader. Dickinson uses her ability to write humourously and ironically (as seen in her suggestion of the use of microscopes) to present a firm, controversial opinion into w...
Psychological criticism is known as the type of criticism that analyses the writer’s work within the realms of Freud’s psychological theories. Such approach can be used when trying to reconstruct an author’s position throughout their literary writings, as well as understanding whom the author was and how their mind created such works. When considering the work of Emily Dickinson, psychoanalytic criticism comes into play with the role of explaining the many meanings behind her poetry, as to make the reader relate to such poetry on a deeper level or not to who she was as a human being.