Embryonic Stem Cell Research Persuasive Essay

Beyond the complicated science and history of stem cell research, complicated ethical battles wage for those who support embryonic research, and those who oppose it. Since the beginning of embryonic stem cell research, more conservative parties have argued against its morality. The main arguments against using spare IFV embryos are: there’s no use for embryonic stem cell research because adult stem cells already achieved successful results, using an embryo for scientific research constitutes as murder, and “embryonic stem cell research violates sanctity of life” (Dunedin).

Although these statements provide strong arguments, those arguing against embryonic stem cell research don’t understand the scientific background behind this process. Adult stem cell uses contain very

Since so many people oppose embryonic stem cell research because it destroys a potential human life, then the newly exercised method of embryonic stem cell retrieval should be the solution. This process contains many similarities to the already implemented technique used for preimplantation genetic diagnosis—a common practice that screens embryonic cells for genetic defects. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the removing the blastomere from an embryo take place by removing a single cell at around day three. Once this cell is removed, it’s cultured into many more cells. By taking this route, embryonic stem cells still benefit humans and the embryo continues maturing—but with currently unknown long term side effects. This solution is necessary, because of the increasing amount of diseases affecting people, and doctors need more innovative ways of treating these diseases. With the new process of embryonic stem cell retrieval, there should be no—or at least much less—opposition because it’s causing no harm to the