Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sanitation in elizabethan england
Personal hygiene in medieval times ESSAY
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
SANITATION: The sanitation in England in the Elizabethan era was terrible and greatly contributed to the influx of many diseases at the time. This was due partly to the fact that the citizens of England had no concern or motive to improve their polluted living environment. The people of England weren’t aware that their eco-destructive habits were ultimately affecting their health and exposing themselves to diseases.
This was also the main reason the public health of England was in such a poor condition. For example, England’s streets and towns were a breeding ground for disease and germs.
overcrowded due to the overpopulation
horse and human excretion on the ground
corpses were left to rot on the gallows
heads of the executed decaying on
…show more content…
poles polluted water and rivers rats and mice roaming around (spread disease) WASTE: The method of waste and rubbish disposal in the 16th century was for the convenience of the Elizabethans and was not environmentally friendly as people weren’t aware of the consequences back then.
The most common way of getting rid of rubbish was to empty their latines and garbage into cesspits, which were then emptied into middens which is the equivalent of a landfill. Waste was also emptied into streams or rivers, like the River Thames which contaminated the water and lead to epidemics in England.
This contributed to why water was a significant problem in England. There was no running water in houses so citizens would have to obtain water from the public fountain or from water carries. Both of these water sources were pumped in from the rivers, which were highly polluted from the town’s constant disposal of sewage and waste into it. Unlike today, there was no sewage system to organise waste and maintain the quality of water.
TOILETS: Chamber Pots were portable clay bowls that were used by Elizabethans to go to the bathroom in. They were very common during the 1500s because toilets were usually located outside the house. Citizens would empty their chamber pots full of toilet waste, out into the street with people walking by. When people did this they would shout ‘Gardyloo’, derived from the french expression which means ‘mind the water’. Their toilet waste would remain in the streets due to the lack of underground pipes and drainage throughout the towns and allow disease
…show more content…
to spread and grow. MEDICAL: In the 16th century in England, the knowledge of medicine or the human anatomy was very little. Doctors in the Elizabethan era were becoming desperate because masses of people were dying of infectious diseases. Even the common cold could kill someone as a cure had not yet been created. Elizabethan doctors experimented and applied any cures or treatments that might work. Unfortunately, in the Elizabethan times, receiving medical treatment was a luxury only the wealthy.
The average fee for a Doctor would be 10 shillings, which was more than most Elizabethans could afford. The poor had to resort to depending on the assistance of the church for comfort.
TREATMENTS:
Broken bones, fractures and wounds were treated in unhygienic conditions which ultimately caused the injury to become worse
There was no such thing as ‘clean’ surgical instruments, so it was likely the patient’s wound would get infected
The treatment for broken bones would be the doctor physically setting the bones back in place - with their hands
The cure for a toothache was getting the tooth pulled out
There were no forms of anaesthetics for surgeries or bone-setting, which made the procedures excruciatingly painful
During the Black Death, plague doctors would wear a leather mask with a bird-like beak on the nose of it. This was to prevent the doctors from breathing the infected air
Urine and vinegar were used as antiseptics
The most common and attainable medicine for poor and wealthy Elizabethans was mixtures of
herbs PLAGUE CURES: Plague doctors had a few tactics in attempt to cure people of the disease: Having the patient carry flowers or wear strong odours Wear lucky charms, for example a rabbit's foot Blood-letting, which was a method of draining blood from veins in hope of balancing the patient’s bodily fluids Using leeches on the patient to get rid of the ‘infected blood’ Covering the patient in mercury and placing them in the oven. The combination of mercury and heat were believed to kill the plague These cures for the plague were all ineffective and some were even deathly. Blood-letting could cause the patient to lose a dangerous amount of blood or face cardiac arrest. Using the tactic of mercury and ovens could increase the risk of death as mercury is poisonous and the heat of the oven could cause severe burns. To achieve a paper-white pale complexion, women in the higher-class, even Queen Elizabeth I used to apply ceruse lead powder on their faces as a foundation. This would have been beneficial for beauty purposes although, lead is highly toxic and the use of it as a cosmetic could lead to lead poisoning, damage of the skin, loss of hair or even death. The usage of lead powder most likely caused Queen Elizabeth I’s hair to fall out and shortened her lifespan.
The book, The Ghost Map, tells the story of the cholera outbreak that took place in England during the medieval era. During this time, London became popular, causing it to become one of the most populous urban cities in England. However, it suffered from overcrowding, a large lower class, and little health regulations. As a result, living conditions and water supply were not the cleanest, and many died from the disease cholera. Though this epidemic led to many deaths/illnesses during it’s time, it has proven to be helpful and important to public health today. Some public health advancements that have occurred as a result include healthier, cleaner, and longer lives lived.
Kira L. S. Newman, “Shutt Up: Bubonic Plague and Quarantine in Early Modern England,” Journal of Social History, 3, (2012): 809-834
This book follows an esteemed doctor and a local clergyman who, together, are the heart of an investigation to solve the mystery of the cholera epidemic. In 1854 London was ravaged by a terrible outbreak of cholera, where within the span of mere weeks over five hundred people in the Soho district died. London, at the time, was a city of around two and a half million people, all crammed into a small area with no system for sewage removal. With overflowing cesspools, improper drainage of all the human and animal waste, and no system for guaranteed clean water, the people of London were in a bad state. They were essentially dumping all of their feces into their drinking water supply, a perfect environment for cholera to thrive.
The Elizabethans shared communal water, handled unwashed food, stepped in excrement from casual discharge of manure, and used urine for dyes, bleaches, and even treatment of wounds. As A.L. Rowse mentions, “many of the citizens possessed chamber pots, usually made of tin, or close stools.” The close stools were put in the cockloft, the sleeping quarters of the Elizabethans. This would obviously reek of horrible odors and force the townsmen to dump them as soon as possible into the slimy cobblestone streets.
An important fact to remember is that in those times, opinions and actions were either based on or blamed on religion and superstition. For example, people started marching across the country, punishing themselves on the basis that the plague was the result of all of man’s sin, whilst trying to persuade people of their cause. Also, charms were used by some cultures, such as the “Abra Kadabra” charm, which was either carved, or worn as protective jewellery to ward off the evil spirits causing the plague. It looked similar to the image below.
Before the Black Plague, living in Britain was interesting and positive but, was not always pleasant. It was too crowded and dirty, Britain was disgusting and unsanitary for the citizens for a long period of time, even before the disease spread to Europe (Ibeji n.pag.). Thus, Britain being so dirty, it was easier for this disease to spread. The citizens of Europe had no clue what was coming to disease them. Many people were not ready for the cultural changes of the disease and were shocked the disease even reached their towns.
The name "Black Death" not only referred to the sinister nature of the disease, but also to the black coloring of the victims' swollen glands.... ... middle of paper ... ... The Catholic Church did many things to try to help people during the Black Death, but probably the most beneficial thing they gave to those suffering was their presence.
Is it little by surprise that the plague was the most dreaded disease in the Elizabethan era. Death is a terrible thing, especially when a person is getting executed. People died of many diseases in that era. Such as blood poisoning, and the bubonic plague which refers back to black death. It was a very violent disease to get, it was very contagious. The most dreadful punishments in this era were getting hung which lead into executions (Linda Alcin 1) .After you are half dead from getting hung they take you and cut you into squares and hang you up around the city of England .
Alchin, Linda. “Elizabethan Medicine and Illnesses” www.elizabethan-era.org. UK. N.P. 16 May 2012 Web. 17 Jan 2014
Diet, Health, and Sanitation in Victorian England are so interrelated that it is difficult to examine one without being led to another. A.S. Wohl sums it up when he states: "It is rather commonplace of modern medical opinion that nutrition plays a crucial role in the body's ability to resist disease and the experience of the World Health Organization indicates that where sanitary conditions are rudimentary and disease is endemic (that is, where nineteenth-century conditions prevail, so to speak) diet may be the crucial factor in infection" (Wohl 56). However, there was often a vicious cycle at work in these trying times and it is difficult to point to the root causes of some of the contagion that infected people. Also there were various philosophies, some not as instructive as others, being practiced in the early part of the nineteenth century that tried to explain sanitation problems and poverty. When can see how pervasive this problem was as it made its way into much of the literature at the time. Its representation was rather grim. Works such as Charles Dickens's Oliver Twist and Elizabeth Gaskell's Mary Barton represent the harsh reality of these conditions.
“The 1910 Report of the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching… further heightened expectations for substantial improvements in the quality of medical care and in the general health of the population” ( Winkelstein, Jr., 2009, p. 44). Issues such as major medical care problems and public safety existed in US cities after industrialization. The emerging progressive era would work to correct sanitation and medical system issues which lead to the US improving conditions. Most of the U.S. population would not acknowledge that there were any problems and these institutions would try to exclude certain people from having access to any health programs. In the Progressive era issues in the healthcare and sanitation systems were improved
The filth of the cities promoted the spread of disease faster than doctors could discover a cure. This encouraged large outbreaks of many deadly diseases. And it is said that throughout this period there were people who went about the cities and towns with wagons calling "Bring out your dead!" in a fashion similar to that of the Medieval era during the bubonic plague (Which, by the way, was not yet a dead disease).
Disease and death are most often associated with the Middle Ages because of the widespread plagues and ignorance of medical knowledge during that time period. It is difficult, however, to ascertain the true nature of illness in the early Medieval Ages because in some written sources, the author’s standpoint distorts the presentation of the disease or cause of a person’s death so that the biological cause is skewed and unattainable.
By the 1840’s high rates of disease were ascribed to the housing many of New York’s poverty-stricken immigrants lived in. Fear spread that while disease was rooted in the polluted living conditions of New York’s poorer communities, disease could easily spread to the more well off citizens too. Public health officials realized that the city’s soiled streets and polluted sewers were a health risk to all New Yorkers. In the mid-nineteenth century, New York possessed a primitive sewage system. Poorly planned sewers spanned the city, but most citizens’ homes did not connect to these pipes. Instead, most New Yorkers relied on outdoor outhouses and privies. Because of the high levels of unmanaged waste, epidemics of infectious diseases were commonplace in New York. The city battled outbreaks of smallpox, typhoid, malaria, yellow fever, cholera, and tuberculosis. In 1849, a rash of cholera struck the city, killing more than five thousand people. A wave of typhoid in the mid-1860’s resulted in a similar amount of deaths. Port cities and transportation hubs, like New York, were especially prone to outbursts of infectious diseases because of the high volume of travelers that passed through the city. Americans realized that they were contracting and dying from infectious diseases at an alarming rate, but weren’t entirely sure of why or how. (Web, par. 17,
Although surgical operations were performed, they did not know about sanitisation and there were no anaesthetics. Most patients died from infection or shock.