Elizabeth Cady Stanton And On The Equality Of The Sexes

1407 Words3 Pages

Elizabeth Cady Stanton, with her draft of the Declaration of Sentiments, Margret Fuller with her book Women in the Nineteenth Century and Judith Sargent Murray’s “On the Equality of the Sexes”, all share the fundamental basis of advocating for women’s rights in terms of education, social affairs, as well as civil rights and liberties. All three women are known figures of women’s empowerment and an overall devotion to the plight of equality with regard to gender. Stanton is well known for, amongst other things, coining the idea of the Seneca Falls Woman’s Convention, which marked the initiation of the voting rights campaign to gain the right to vote for women across the nation, where her first draft of the “Declaration of Sentiments” was debuted. Fuller, was a renowned author and teacher, who, along with Murray, continues to be recognized and celebrated as the one of the first pioneering Americans to write about women’s rights and equality of the sexes in her book: Women in the Nineteenth Century. All three authors and subsequently their texts address inequality with respect to gender, make suggestions for improvement and reform, and use rhetorical techniques such as logos, pathos, and ethos to incite particular reactions for their intended audience. They address inequality as a social and cultural hierarchy in which men are the leaders and sole benefactors. They also suggest that both men and women should reform their conviction on what women are capable of and are entitled to in terms of education, social affairs, and civil rights while using rhetoric as the driving force for their arguments.
Each of the texts, although in different ways, suggest that inequality serves as a function of a male dominated social and cultural hier...

... middle of paper ...

... to the domesticated woman urging her to care for her family providing food for the body but to also care for herself in providing food for her mind: A house is no home unless it contain food and fire for the mind as well as for the body” (602). Murray, also makes suggestion for reform, encouraging women not to abandon their familial roles, but, rather tend to their family’s domestic needs dynamically saying “while we are pursuing the needle, or the superintendency of the family, I repeat, that our minds are at full liberty for reflection; that imagination may exert itself in full vigor” (405). In saying this she encourages women not to be passive but to be active and dynamic in their supposed roles as women, to defy the notion of the archetypal woman who tends to her family and has nothing that pertains to her solely and enrich the mind and subsequently herself.

Open Document