Elie Wiesel's 'Oven Of Akhnai'

1144 Words3 Pages

A fascinating theme in the passage from the “Oven Of Akhnai”, found in the Babylonian Talmud (Bava Metzia 59b:Bava Metzia 59a-59b), is the rabbis’ unusually stubborn devotion to their legalistic conclusion regarding the cleanliness of the oven of Akhnai. They are so dedicated to their ruling that not even impossible miracles or God’s own voice (Bat Kol) can change their minds. This passage shows how tenacious the ego and power of a majority can be. I will begin by talking about the miracles and God’s message to the Sages. Then I will discuss why this seemingly simple and uninteresting argument meant so much to these sages and how they are so steadfast in their opinion that they contradict God with his own words. My next argument is that …show more content…

All of the sages except Rabbi Eliezer declared the oven impure. Rabbi Eliezer answered every single question the Sages had but they would not change their minds. Rabbi Eliezer then performed miracles in an attempt to convince the other Sages that he was right. He uprooted a carob tree 100 feet and reversed a flow of a water channel. The Sages claimed that these miracles did not prove that he was right. Then Rabbi Eliezer called on the walls of the house of study to prove him right and they began to fall. However, Rabbi Joshua protested the walls and because of the honor of both Rabbis, the walls stayed inclined at an …show more content…

Rabbi Joshua completely takes this verse out of context. Exodus 23:2 says, “Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong. When you give testimony in a lawsuit, do not pervert justice by siding with the crowd.” This is the exact opposite of the point Rabbi Joshua was trying to make. The idea that Rabbi Joshua was trying to convey was that the law should follow the majority. The majority crowd is perverting justice by refusing to admit they are wrong even in the face of all the answers and signs that were provided to them by Rabbi Eliezer and God (Greenwood 352). Exodus 23:2 is about not following the crowd in doing any or bad things. Rabbi Eliezer did the right thing. He knew the crowd was wrong and he stuck with what he knew was right and what God told him was right. The other Rabbi are wrong and hypocritical for quoting Exodus 23:2 and then excommunicating Rabbi Eliezer for not conforming to the crowd. This story also deals with the topic of majority rule. It shows that the majority is not always right. Obviously Rabbi Eliezer is the only correct Rabbi in interpreting what God’s intent for the law is. The story also shows that being right is not always powerful enough to beat the majority that is wrong (Greenwood 340). Even though they have a majority, it was not good enough for Rabbi

Open Document