Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Electoral college vs popular vote
Voter turnout in the us
A thesis statement on the Origin of the Electoral College
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Electoral college vs popular vote
The land of the free and the home of the brave is not as free or brave as one might think. The voting that takes place during the presidential election is not an accurate representation of what the free world wants; and if the citizens of this nation do not take a stand against this injustice then the United States is not the home of the brave either. The nationalism behind the Electoral College is vacant. Over the course of the two hundred years that this country was born the American citizens would stop at nothing to receive the rights that were finally granted to them, one of which includes popular sovereignty where the majority rules and allows all citizens to have a say in the government. The American citizens need to preserve the rights …show more content…
that their past generations have fought tirelessly for. These rights have been taken for granted ever since 1787 when the Electoral College was enacted. The pride that was once encapsulated in the american voting system is no longer prevalent in the nation and the only way to bring back the true right of popular sovereignty is to abolish the Electoral College. The Electoral college is a process for electing the president of the United States in which the founding fathers had established, one of which was Alexander Hamilton.
Alexander Hamilton was a federalist, meaning he advocated the ideology of strong national power as opposed to more individual state power. Hamilton stated “...that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station…” (Doc. 1) meaning he wanted only the elites to vote because they were the only ones “capable of analyzing” what was best for the country. Although this was a spectacular processes in the past when most citizens were not properly educated and could not decipher what had to be done for themselves let alone for the entire country. However, in today's society the American citizens are educated with the basics of politics and they are aware what is best for them. Considering that this county was founded on individuality, the country vote needs to be by the individual needs of each citizen. To get a proper representation of what the citizen needs the electoral college must be abolished. This system is only cheating the american people by not …show more content…
allowing the people to govern the government. The sole responsibility of the United States government is to protect each right bestowed upon each citizen, however, with the Electoral College the government is taking away one of the very same rights they are supposed to be protecting. Not allowing the American people to cast votes directly has caused problems dating back to 1824. The Electoral College system elects the president based on the popular vote meaning a candidate must receive a vote of at least 51%. As shown in the chart, Results from the Election of 1824, (Doc. 3), when Andrew Jackson ran for president against John Quincy Adams, Jackson received the majority of the popular vote of 41.3% and Adams only received 30.9% of the popular vote. Because candidate did not reach the true majority vote of 51%, the election fell into the hands of the House of Representatives where John Quincy Adams was then elected as the president to the United states. This corrupt system is neglecting the people's choice ever since 1824 and this dreadful system must be retracted for the American voice to be heard. Moreover, the Electoral College grants each state a different number of votes. As shown in 2016 Presidential Election Electoral Vote Map & Project (Doc. 7), at a first glance one can easily tell the difference of the amount of electoral votes each state receives. More importantly the fact that the party that receives the highest number of those electoral Votes gets all of the electoral votes of that state. For an example, California has a total of 55 electoral votes and they are likely to vote Democrat. However, not every person in California is a democrat. The Electoral College is again silencing many members of the country because the majority of votes that are not in favor of the minority ideals of the people who live in that state. The minority votes matter just as much as the majority vote for those votes were casted by American citizens as well. With the extreme number of electoral votes that California has the republican party would have to solidify the three major tossup states that are Florida, North Carolina, and Virginia to have only 2 more electoral votes than California. Only 2, meaning that if the Democrats were to have the majority electoral votes in Wisconsin (6 electoral votes) they would receive all 10 of Wisconsin's electoral votes and the democrats would be again up by 8 electoral votes. The electoral college is meant to be a fair and accurate representation of the od the people's choice. However, it normally favors democratic political party because the states in which are likely to vote democrat have more electoral votes than those of republican. Some people might be intimidated by this system and the predicting of the outcome which can discourage voters from voting making them feel that if they do not live in the toss up states then there is no purpose of voting because those states are predicted to vote for their opposing party. Not only is the electoral college unfair to the American people, it is also detrimental to the American community. It is possible for this system to cause low voter turnout. The voters would feel as though their vote does not matter because it will not change the outcome of the electoral vote. This ideal is prevalent in Article 2, Section 1 of the United States Constitution (Doc. 2) where the population per electoral vote changes per state. The population of Wyoming consist of 563,626 people however the population per electoral vote consists of 187,875 meaning they receive only 3 electoral votes. However, in California with a population of 37,253,956 the population per electoral vote is 677,345 therefore they receive 55 electoral votes. This is again a fault in the the Electoral College. For this system to be truly fair the number per electoral vote needs to be an equal number throughout all states because then the minority citizen ideals will also be heard as opposed to them being silenced by the majority voters ideals. If every citizen in California were to have as much sway as the citizens of Wyoming over their electoral votes than california should receive 198 electoral votes based on their population of 37,253,956. But, because the Electoral College is a ‘win and take all’ type system this would give the state of California too much power when electing the next leader of the free world. Any of the many ways one could attempt to alter Electoral College there will always be citizens feeling cheated out of their vote because there is no way for the turn out of the election to be equally fair to all citizens under the tyrannical umbrella that is the Electoral College. This is only one of the reasons why the electoral college should be completely abolished and the country should run on true popular sovereignty. Voting is one of the many things that make America the great country that it is.
Voting for one's future leader is an immense responsibility and a strong government move that was ahead of its time when first established. As Abraham Lincoln once said “The ballot is stronger than the bullet.” The Electoral College must be abolished in order for every citizen's ballot to be stronger than the bullet. Democracy will be a virtue that this country will always be privileged enough endure for it is the foundation of America. The Electoral College however is only impeding the the democratic nationalism. The Electoral College does not prove to be an accurate representation of the American people, therefore even the republic that is in place is taking away one of the basic principles that was bestowed upon America. Popular sovereignty must be effective on a national level as opposed to the state level. Although the popular vote of the Electoral College does take popular votes it does not take it on the national level. That is the problem of this system and because there is no impeccable way of mending this wretched system, it has to be abolished for the sake of all american
citizens.
This has has always been a big thing for the United States, has it’s people are bringing in a new person who would eventually lead their country into a good path. When it comes to actually doing the rough work like voting for a new President, that would be an entirely different story. In a chart from Document G, there are 4 past elections listed that compares the popular votes to the electoral votes. In the 2000 election, George W. Bush won by 271 electoral votes, while Gore won by 266 electoral votes. This may seem reasonable for Bush to be the president, but when it comes to the popular vote, although, Gore had highest amount of popular votes than Bush did. So why did Bush win instead? This is one of the main reasons why the Electoral College should be abolished. If the Electoral College stays then the people will not be able to choose the right person for the right job. So this shows how it can cause so many people to be frustrated with the Electoral College, which does not really help the country at all, in terms of the choosing a new
Through these almost 2 and a half centuries since the beginning of the Electoral College there has been a large change in population. Since then, the U.S. has grown from a mere 4 million to a looming number of around 300 million people. It is because of this population increase that the Electoral College has become obsolete and is beginning to fail at its duties. Alexander Hamilton was a Federalist and a supporter of the Electoral College who was quoted as saying “It was also desirable to afford as little opportunity as possible to tumult and disorder/ promise an effectual security against this mischief” (Document #1). The College would have prevented tumult and disorder for
Every four years, the citizens of America migrate to their respective polling locations and cast their vote. On this important day, the second Tuesday of November, the next President of the United States is elected. The election race for United States presidential candidates undergo a political marathon, negotiating primaries, party conventions and an electoral college system along the way. The electoral college is one of the main aspect of a presidential election. The Electoral College is made up of electors in each state, who represent the states popular vote. Each presidential party or candidate designates a group of electors in each state, equal to the States electoral votes, who are considered to be loyal to that candidate, to each State’s
The Electoral College system should be scrapped and be replaced with popular vote because it is unfair. By abolishing the Electoral College and replacing it with popular vote, it would represent citizens equally, it would allow citizens to elect their president just as they elect their governors and senators, and it would motivate and encourage citizens to participate in voting.
The Electoral College was created by the framers at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. They believe that it wasn’t a good idea for the people to elect the president directly because they did not trust that voters would have enough information to make a good choice. The Electoral College basically chooses who the next president will be since it takes away our freedom to vote. The Electoral College should be abolished because it’s undemocratic, the small states are overrepresented, and it hurts third parties. The United States of America is a democratic country that is characterized by the equality of rights and privileges.
Voting is at the center of every democratic system. In america, it is the system in which a president is elected into office, and people express their opinion. Many people walk into the voting booth with the thought that every vote counts, and that their vote might be the one that matters above all else. But in reality, America’s voting system is old and flawed in many ways. Electoral College is a commonly used term on the topic of elections but few people actually know how it works.
In fact, the Constitution contains provisions for direct and indirect election of the different parts of the legislature and the executive, based on overlapping but distinct electorates (Muller 1251). In addition, many people believe that, the Electoral College process of electing the president necessitates replacement with a direct popular vote to honor our democratic form of government in the United States. Moreover, in a democratic form of government, the authority rests with the people rather than in one or a few as in a totalitarian or authoritarian form of government. People believe a direct election supports the 14th Amendment principle of “one person, one vote” (Wagner 577). Therefore, the winner-take-all system inaccurately represents the will of the American citizens since not all candidates garner any electoral votes. On the other hand, a popular vote for the president could lead to many runoffs if neither candidate reaches a majority, creating a bigger opportunity for voter fraud and manipulation of the vote, which would not truly represent the will of the people, states, or country. The Electoral College sometimes fails to represent the national popular vote because states use the winner-take-all approach and not some proportional method for the representation of its voters. However, the Founding Fathers were not too keen on
The American Society grants every citizen of legal age to vote in elections. The Electoral College System provides electoral votes to candidates despite losing popular votes. The Electoral College System is unfair as candidates who do not win popular vote can still win a presidential election. This system is unfair as it grants 538 electors to become the voice of 319 million people.
This process of electing a president is unjust and is not based off of the people’s views. In Document D the chart provided illustrates how some of the electoral votes favor some states over others; for example the twelve states listed and the district of Columbia seem to have a bigger say in the presidential election process than the citizens of Illinois. This itself is unfair because Illinois deserves to have an accurate representation of their votes, the same as other states do. This shows that the Electoral College undercuts the principle of one person, one vote, and therefore violates political equality. “It is not a neutral counting device... it favors some citizens over others, depending solely upon the state in which voters cast their votes for president” (Document D). Political equality means all citizens are equal and it also allows citizens to partake in state affairs, including the right to vote and the right to challenge elections. However the Electoral College violates the principle of this for the fact that it weighs some citizens’ votes more heavily than others (video). Generally it makes no sense for the people to vote if they’re not even counted, and either way it violates their rights.
The Electoral College was a compromise between those at the Constitutional Convention who wanted the US president elected by popular vote and those who wanted congress to select the president. They believed that having it where each state would get a certain number of votes based on population would keep a manipulative and charming person out of office. They thought it would prevent bribery and corruption along with secret dealings. I don’t think that this is the case and it one of the reason I feel that the Electoral College should be abolished.
The United States is a privileged country with freedoms and opportunities many countries strive to achieve. People come into the United States in hopes to obtain these rights and make a better life for themselves; they strive to achieve “The American Dream.” Citizens are given the chance to vote, speak their mind, and live according to their desires without prejudice. However, the same government that promises hope has flaws that frustrate the American people; the Electoral College is one topic of debate. Many feel this system is a safe way to regulate who leads the country, while others feel that issues should be left to popular vote.
As the United States of America gets older, so does the presidential election voting system. The argument to change this method of voting has been becoming more and more popular as the years go on. It has been said that the Framers of the Constitution came up with this method because of the bad transportation, communication, and they feared the public’s intelligence was not suitable for choosing the President of the United States. Others say that the Framers made this method because they feared that the public did not receive sufficient information about candidates outside of their state to make such a decision based on direct popular vote. My research on this controversial issue of politics will look into the factors into why the Electoral College exists and if it is possibly outdated for today’s society. It will look into the pros and cons of this voting system, and it will explore the alternative methods of voting such as the Direct Popular vote. Many scholarly authors have gathered research to prove that this voting system is outdated and it does not accurately represent the national popular will. Many U.S. citizens value their vote because they only get one to cast towards the candidate of their choice in the presidential election. Based on the Electoral College system their vote may possibly not be represented. Because of today’s society in the U.S. the Electoral College should be abolished because it is not necessary to use a middle-man to choose our president for us. It is a vote by the people, all of us having one voice, one vote.
In the United States we are all guaranteed one vote per person. Everyone has an equal voice in electing the people that serve in the government. Every four years during the month of November citizens of America go to the polls to vote for a president and vice-president of the United States. Am I right? Not really. They actually vote for electors that then vote for our president. It makes me wonder, "Are we a democracy?" Having the Electoral College defeats its purpose. I oppose the electoral college for these three reasons, in election 2000 the president that lost the popular vote actually won, everyone's vote doesn't really count, plus the electoral college has disrupted elections fifteen times!
The Founders built certain protections for individual rights into this country's founding documents. The United States Constitution was one such document. In particular, such protections guard Americans who hold minority viewpoints from those who side with the majority. For example, the First Amendment protects the right of free speech to ensure that people who hold unpopular views have just as much freedom to express those views as do people who tend to agree with the majority. The United States Constitution, therefore, was intended to protect the individual rights of Americans from a tyrannical government and majority. However, today, the Electoral College does not represent the vibrant democracy into which the United States has grown.
Caroline’s presentation was on the issue of if the electoral college should be retained for the purpose of electing presidents or if it should be done away with. The thesis presented was that the electoral college is too outdated and contradictory to the popular vote to justify its continuation, even if was meant as a more efficient way of deciding victors. Besides the supporting points of its contradictory and outdated nature, it was also pointed out that its does more to divide the country than it does to elect candidates for the whole nation.