Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American federalism
Features of federalism in the united states
Features of federalism in the united states
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: American federalism
The electoral college is a system that uses the voice of the states in order to give a presidential running candidate access to the white house. The electoral college should not be abolished because it provides order, equality, and it prevents mistakes being made in order to choose the right candidate. There is so much evidence in history to prove that the electoral college is a well devised system in order to give power to the more qualified individual. The electoral college is an important system formed by the framer of the constitutional in order to keep many things properly aligned, it provides a voice to those who would otherwise be taken for granted, and it limits what “bigger” powers can do in order to avoid tyranny. First of all, …show more content…
we know that the framers of the constitution intended for government to be a complicated system in order to grant the right candidate the power to the white house. “But our system is not designed to be simple and efficient. It is designed to promote good government and legislation that forwards the common good of large and diverse nation.” (Doc C). We are told here that the government has always been a complex system but yet it provides order. It is also mentioned that, “... is central to our grand constitution effort to restrain power.” (Doc C). Here we are told that in order to provide order we shall have a restraint to power because if power is granted excessively to the wrong person the order would be lost. Thus the electoral college shall not be abolished because it's a federalist system that preserves order and it prevents people from disrupting that. Another reason why the electoral college should not be abolished is because it provides equality and a voice to the small states or a state with a very small population.
In Document D we see how there are states such as New Hampshire with a population of 1,316,470 citizens and we see states like North Dakota with a population of 672,591. Although there is a huge population difference New Hampshire has 4 electoral votes and North dakota has 3. This provides equality because if the bigger states controlled the majority of votes then all the running candidates would go to the “big” places in order to win. This would make the other states feel left out and maybe even feel as if their votes don't matter and eventually feel disenfranchised. “ Therefore, the changing population affects not only representation but also how many electoral votes a state has. A state can never have fewer than three elector.” (Doc A). As we see population still has a lot to do with electoral votes but yet no matter how small of a population it has. It still is provided with a “voice”. Thus the electoral college should not be abolished because it provides the states with a equality and no matter how “small” it is it is never left …show more content…
out. But another reason why the electoral college should not be abolished is because it prevents the wrong person to be chosen to run our country.
“Historically, federalism (the combination of central government with some authority given to state and local governments) is central to our grand constitution effort to restrain power.” (Doc C). Here we are told that the federalist system which includes the electoral college was founded in order to restrain power and if the wrong person is even chosen he would not have complete power.For example we know this based on how congress works because there are two major parts of congress which is Senate and The House of Representatives. Here we see how both have different duties and how bills and laws cannot get passed without both agreeing on something. “... the electoral college has been the linchpin of american political prosperity. It has formed our political parties, moderate our extreme elements, and forged the presidential campaigns that have given direction to our ship of state.” (Doc C). We know that the framers of the constitution intended things to be difficult and they used the electoral college as a way to shape the country to the greatness it is
now. Although most people think that the electoral college favors some citizens over others and that they believe that they did not have another representation option making the electoral college seem unfair, the electoral college should not be abolished because the people have always had a voice in the government and either way they have had the opportunities to make their votes which most people don't. As we have seen in history the presidential vote turnout is only 50% while the midterm is only 30%. We the people have always been included in the electoral college yet not many people exercise this. Thus the electoral college should not be abolished because no matter heat it still proves, order, equality and the right choice to run our country.
Abolishing the Electoral College is the best option for our democracy because keeping it slim the chances for independent candidates to win and unfair voting distribution to exist. In Document B, the 1992 presidential election shows Ross Perot with 19,743,821 votes but 0 electoral votes. Independent candidates like Ross Perot don’t get any electoral votes but millions of popular votes. This proves my claim to be true because major party candidates are receiving all electoral votes and are not allowing independent candidates to have a fair election. In Document F it states, “Because each state casts only one vote, the single representative in Wyoming, representing 500,000 voters, would have as much say as the 55 representatives from California,
The Electoral College is the name given to a group of electors who are nominated by political activists and party members within the states. The electoral college really isn't necessary and should be abolished. There are numerous reasons why this is so. With the Electoral College in affect third parties don't have a chance to become the president, which isn't fair. Electors are expected to be honest but in the past our country has caught some untruthful ones. The electoral College was created so long ago that it is now outdated, so we shouldn't even have electors. People of the U.S. may think that they are participating in a direct election for the president, but with the Electoral College system technically, this isn't the case.
The Electoral College system should be scrapped and be replaced with popular vote because it is unfair. By abolishing the Electoral College and replacing it with popular vote, it would represent citizens equally, it would allow citizens to elect their president just as they elect their governors and senators, and it would motivate and encourage citizens to participate in voting.
In fact, the Constitution contains provisions for direct and indirect election of the different parts of the legislature and the executive, based on overlapping but distinct electorates (Muller 1251). In addition, many people believe that, the Electoral College process of electing the president necessitates replacement with a direct popular vote to honor our democratic form of government in the United States. Moreover, in a democratic form of government, the authority rests with the people rather than in one or a few as in a totalitarian or authoritarian form of government. People believe a direct election supports the 14th Amendment principle of “one person, one vote” (Wagner 577). Therefore, the winner-take-all system inaccurately represents the will of the American citizens since not all candidates garner any electoral votes. On the other hand, a popular vote for the president could lead to many runoffs if neither candidate reaches a majority, creating a bigger opportunity for voter fraud and manipulation of the vote, which would not truly represent the will of the people, states, or country. The Electoral College sometimes fails to represent the national popular vote because states use the winner-take-all approach and not some proportional method for the representation of its voters. However, the Founding Fathers were not too keen on
In conclusion, the Electoral College should be abolished because small states are unrepresented, there are many flaws in the system, and it is not accurate based on people 's votes. Overall there seems to be no need for it, it was made for the reason that back then they thought it was a simple way of choosing a president, but really it just causes problems and does not represent the candidates or voters fairly. If America is truly about equality and democracy, then they will abolish the Electoral College and let the people have a
The first article “Why the Electoral College” by Frank Kuchar, published March 10, 2016, illustrates the advantages of the Electoral College rather then that of a direct popular vote adding that abolishing the already existing system and replacing it with a direct popular vote would change the entire U.S. government system. While in the other article “Point: Abolishing the Electoral College” by Benjamin Bolinger, published in 2007, illustrates the authors argument in favor of abolishing the Electoral College thinking that it would allow for the election of a president through a popular vote that most closely reflects the will of the American people. The Electoral College system of electing a President and Vic-President is an outdated system
The Electoral College today is a very complex system of voting and campaigning. When it was first created, the Framers thought the average citizen of their day was not intelligent enough to know who should be leading their country. So they created the Electoral College which was run by people who knew what they were doing. The Electoral College is a body of people who represent each state and they determine the president. The real question is: Has the Electoral College gotten too far out of hand where it needs to go? The answer is yes. The reasons are because any third party candidate running in the election has no chance of winning any electoral votes. Also, it gives too much power to the big states in electoral votes. Finally, it creates problems on majority electoral votes and equality of smaller states is diminished.
The Electoral College was a compromise between those at the Constitutional Convention who wanted the US president elected by popular vote and those who wanted congress to select the president. They believed that having it where each state would get a certain number of votes based on population would keep a manipulative and charming person out of office. They thought it would prevent bribery and corruption along with secret dealings. I don’t think that this is the case and it one of the reason I feel that the Electoral College should be abolished.
The Founders built certain protections for individual rights into this country's founding documents. The United States Constitution was one such document. In particular, such protections guard Americans who hold minority viewpoints from those who side with the majority. For example, the First Amendment protects the right of free speech to ensure that people who hold unpopular views have just as much freedom to express those views as do people who tend to agree with the majority. The United States Constitution, therefore, was intended to protect the individual rights of Americans from a tyrannical government and majority. However, today, the Electoral College does not represent the vibrant democracy into which the United States has grown.
Some of the founders wondered if it would be wise to permit average citizens to vote but wanted to stay true to their republican principles. The Electoral College was their answer. Because the system is written into the Constitution, an amendment would be required to alter the process. Like the Senate, the Electoral College helps to distribute power away from the most populated areas of the US. California gets 55 votes compared to Wyoming’s 3, but this divide would be much greater in a purely popular
In order to address the issue whether the Electoral College should be thrown away or not, the reasons why it was first established in the first place must be discussed. Generally speaking, the Electoral College’s main intent is to deliver ‘the people’s choice’ in regards to choosing the president. In addition, it tries to adequately meet many standards that our founding fathers desired such as
This was created as a form of compromise between the opposing ideas of how the President should be elected. The Electoral College is comprised of electoral voters by a total of 538 electors. This number comes from the number of representatives in congress for each state, 1 for each member in the House of Representatives and 2 for the senate plus 3 more voters in the District of Columbia. This means that the total eligible voting population in the United States is represented by 538 votes to elect their leader. This dilutes the representation of each citizen to the majority in its area, which is unjust and unfair for the minority, which should still be able to voice their opinion and let their voice be heard. The Electoral College was put in place because it was believed a popular vote gave too much power to high-populated areas. How is that different from creating representation in the Electoral College based on the representatives in Congress, since the House of Representatives is also based on population? Signifying that the population still has an effect on how the President is elected. Another view is that not every citizen, at the time white male, was knowledgeable enough to elect the Head of State without the Electoral system. This, even though some might still agree with that previous notion, should not be the basis why the Citizens of the “free world” do not hold the equal power in electing their
However, history has shown that electors have, more often than not, simply voted for the candidate who wins the popular vote in their state. The electors themselves are chosen by political parties, who expect them to vote with along party lines. Some states even have laws punishing electors if they don’t vote for the winner of the state they represent. As shown in Document G, the winners of the Electoral College in 1876, 1888, and 2000, Rutherford Hayes, Benjamin Harrison, and George W. Bush, all went on to become president after the electors voted accordingly with their state results. The present form of the Electoral College is a complete departure from the Founding Fathers’
The Electoral College is a flawed idea that should be abolished. Despite it being the only thing that is used, it is still unfair, the system is somewhat complicated, and does not represent the citizens properly.
The founding fathers created the Electoral College for many reasons. One of the reasons was to give the people the right to have a say on who becomes president and another reason was to give congress the right to choose as well. At the time of the 1787 Constitutional Convention this was a topic that aroused many opposing ideas and opinions. They had three choices, to allow the public direct elections, grant congress the right to elect the president or give electors the privilege of selecting the countries leader. What they were trying to do was to prevent absolute power. Since they had their taste of King George's way of ruling they were afraid that if they let one group of people choose the president then that group would gain too much power or the president elected would feel too pow...