Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What makes one a human
What makes one a human
Challenge of cultural identity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What makes one a human
Todos los seres vivos tienen un objetivo o una tendencia en la vida. La de los humanos es mucho más complicada que la de los animales y requiere de constante investigación científica y filosófica, ya que dicha tendencia puede llegar a variar. A través de los años, varios filósofos como Aristóteles han tratado de dar una definición a qué es lo que nos hace humanos. Al mismo tiempo, muchos ecuatorianos nos hemos preguntado qué es ser mestizo y qué consecuencias nos trae ese hecho. El objetivo de este ensayo será intentar definir qué es lo que nos hace humanos, enfocándonos en los textos de Bauman, Mill y Aristóteles y también tratar de responder la pregunta sobre nuestra descendencia.
La definición que escribió Aristóteles parece la más precisa y lógica. Él decía que todo tiende hacia un bien y que el bien es aquello hacia lo que todas las cosas tienden. Nos habla sobre los fines y nos define que estos son actividades que realizamos para llegar a la felicidad. En resumen, Aristóteles nos dice que todo lo que el hombre haga en la vida, cualquier acción que realice siempre será para llegar a un bien. Al decir todo esto, estamos de una u otra forma definiendo a la identidad humana, ya que, en esencia, es a lo que la humanidad tiende, y según Aristóteles es el bien. (Aristóteles, 1998: pp. 131-149)
La identidad humana busca el bien y la felicidad y por eso básicamente todo lo que hacemos en la vida, por todo lo que nos esforzamos, los estudios, el trabajo, etc. es para obtener un buen estatus económico, y con ello alimentarnos, disfrutar de lujos, nuevas experiencias, entre otros. Básicamente buscamos nuevas experiencias constantemente ya que disfrutamos mucho de ellas, muchos creen que estas se consiguen con una gran cantidad de di...
... middle of paper ...
...ría piensa, sino que nos trajo nuevas costumbres, mejoró varias técnicas de agricultura y producción, nos impartió una religión que hoy felizmente la mayoría creemos y mejoró la raza.
Works Cited
Referencias:
Identidad humana:
Aristóteles. (1998) Ética Nicomáquea Ética Eudemia: Sobre la felicidad. Madrid: Gredos.
Bauman, Z. (2006) Comunidad: La Agonía de Tántalo. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Mill, J. (2008) Sobre la libertad. Madrid: El libro de bolsillo.
Identidad mestiza:
Watson, P. (2013). La Mente "INDIA": las ideas en el nuevo mundo. En IDEAS "HISTORIA INTELECTUAL DE LA HUMANIDAD". España: EGEDSA
Apolo, M. (2011) Los mestizos ecuatorianos y las senias de identidad cultural. Madrid: Tramasocial.
Tomaselli, L. (2008) Ciudadanos vs canibales: la construccion de la identidad mestiza.
Echeverría, B. (2011) Discurso Crítico y Modernidad. Bogotá: desde abajo
In the first section, Monroy describes the Indian and the Iberian cultures and illustrates the role each played during missionization, as the Indians adapted ?to the demands of Iberian imperialism.?(5) He stresses the differen...
Bartolomé de Las Casas was born in 1484 AD in Seville and died in 1566 in Madrid. In the ending of the 15th century and the beginning of 16th, he came to America and become a “protector of Indian”. In 1542, most based on his effort, Spain has passed the New Law, which prohibit slaving Indians (Foner, p. 7). In 1552, he published the book A Short Account of the Destruction of The Indies.
Texas Indians were very unique in their culture and way of life. The Texas Indians had a unique social order; physical appearance, acquired subsistence in many different ways, and had many unique cultural practice. As a result, many historians study the native Indians in Texas with awe and amazement. With a deep and interesting analysis of the Texas Indians, historians can understand the people; and their way of life. Based on the text, “La Relacion” which was written by Alvar Nunez de Vaca, an analysis of said subject can be conducted.
... haber estudiado y analizado el cuento “El Otro Yo” he llegado a la conclusión de que el ser humano no tiene la posibilidad de entender algo tan complejo como lo es la realidad. La realidad, como los estereotipos sexuales y costumbres de una cultura, es un universo que abarca todo y la comprensión que tenemos de ella puede ser forjada como algo personal o como algo general. De acuerdo con Cognitum (2011), “Mario Benedetti por medio de su obra nos muestra que no somos consientes de los objetos que nos rodea. Los elementos utilizados por el autor a lo largo del texto sirven para indicar la complejidad del tema. La vida nos es mostrada como algo que es imposible de descifrar completamente.” Desde los aspectos tan básicos que hacemos diariamente, las personas que frecuentamos y lo que creemos son elementos que pueden como ciertos como o pertenecientes a otra realidad.
Everyone has specific characteristics and qualities that make them the way they present themselves. Young, middle-aged, and old people are constantly forming the essentials that affect their self-awareness through their daily activities. Forming one’s identity is an ongoing process, because every person in the world can change people one way or another. In The House on Mango Street, the experiences young Esperanza faced day to day develop her true individuality.
The Nicomachean Ethics, written by Aristotle, represents his most important contribution within the field of Ethics; it is a collection of ten books, covering a variety of interesting topics, throughout the collection. Aristotle tries to draw a general understanding of the human good, exploring the causes of human actions, trying to identify the most common ultimate purpose of human actions. Indeed, Aristotelian’s ethics, also investigates through the psychological and the spiritual realms of human beings. Without pretending to exhaust with too many references, it would be rather useful to focus on the most criticized part of the philosopher’s attempt, which is also the very starting point of his masterpiece, identified as eudaimonia (happiness, well being) and ergon (function), in Aristotelian terms.
In consideration to Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle’s view of the great-souled man is that of an individual that represents happiness and obtains the five virtues: wisdom, justice, bravery, self-control, and the overall goodness within an individual (happiness). The magnanimous person is very complex and displays the proper virtues at the proper time, and in the proper way. In addition, the great-souled man accommodates to his surroundings where he is honorable but not boastful in his actions. Aristotle believes that it is only possible to attain happiness within a political organization because happiness represents living well without being concerned with others, they solely live for the truth and not approval.
In taking the name Société des observateurs de l’homme, and the ancient motto ‘Gnothi seauton’, Know thyself, the society has devoted itself to the science of man, in his physical, moral and intellectual existence; it has called to its observations the true friends of philosophy and moral reality, the deep metaphysician, the practical doctor, the historian, the traveller, the student of the nature of language, the educationalist. In this way, man, followed and compared in the different scenes of life, will become the subject of research the more useful as it is free from passion, prejudice and excessive systematization.
In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he thoroughly indicated a well-defined direction in order to achieve our true nature to which we seek happiness. For Aristotle, to be human means to be a rational animal who flourishes through reason to achieve the highest human good. To achieve happiness, one must li...
One of Aristotle’s conclusions in the first book of Nicomachean Ethics is that “human good turns out to be the soul’s activity that expresses virtue”(EN 1.7.1098a17). This conclusion can be explicated with Aristotle’s definitions and reasonings concerning good, activity of soul, and excellence through virtue; all with respect to happiness.
Nicholas B. Dirks. (2011). Castes of Mind: Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton University Press
This paper will explain Aristotle’s idea of the good life as well as how virtues fit into the equation and if they are stable and enduring. Pertaining to the prompt, I will explain the three types of friendships Aristotle describes and how one of the friendships is the best according to him. I will also show the reason why Aristotle views friendship as one of the greatest goods. To answer the critic, I will show that although Aristotle holds that the good life is self-sufficient, because he holds friendship in such a high regard, he believes that a person will not be able to obtain perfect happiness without friendship.
Aristotle once stated that, “But if happiness be the exercise of virtue, it is reasonable to suppose that it will be the exercise of the highest virtue; and that will be the virtue or excellence of the best part of us.” (481) It is through Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics that we are able to gain insight into ancient Greece’s moral and ethical thoughts. Aristotle argues his theory on what happiness and virtue are and how man should achieve them.
When in 1978 Edward W. Said published his book Orientalism, it presented a turning point in post-colonial criticism. He introduced the term Orientalism, and talked about 2 of its aspects: the way the West sees the Orient and the way the West controls the Orient. Said gave three definitions of Orientalism, and it is through these definitions that I will try to demonstrate how A Passage to India by E. M. Forster is an Orientalist text. First, Said defined Orientalism as an academic discipline, which flourished in 18th and 19th century.
This paper will examine the characteristics that it takes to being considered a species that is fully human. We will be focusing on who the Neantherthals and the Denisovans were, and what evidence do we have. Lastly, based through research, we will conclude whether Neanderthals were, and how they lived. Lastly, based through research, we will conclude whether Neanderthal’s meet the requirements to being considered fully human.