Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethics and social responsibility in business
Ethics and social responsibility in business
Values of business ethics and sustainability
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethics and social responsibility in business
This paper looks at current condition of the improvement of the Adequacy Economy Rationality in the Thai business segment. The Philosophy Sufficiency Economy, serves as a guide in the way of living and behaving for people of all levels, and is scalable with universal domain applicability, including business organizations. His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej quoted “Economic development must be done step by step. It should begin with the strengthening of our economic foundation, by assuring that the majority if our population has enough to live on…Once reasonable progress has been achieved, we should then embark on the next steps, by pursuing more advanced levels of economic development” (Adulyadej, n.d).
Keywords: Sufficiency, Moderation, Reasonableness,
…show more content…
First, Sufficiency entails three components: Moderation, Reasonableness, and requirement for a Self-immunity system, i.e. the ability to cope with shocks from internal and external changes. Second, two underlying conditions necessary to achieve Sufficiency a is knowledge and morality. ‘Sufficiency Economy’ requires breadth and thoroughness in planning, carefulness in applying knowledge, and the implementation of those plans. As for the Moral/Ethical condition, ‘Sufficiency Economy’ enforces the conditions that people are to possess -- honesty and integrity -- while conducting their lives with perseverance, harmlessness and generosity. The Sufficiency Economy, Philosophy serves as a guide in the way of living/behaving for people of all levels, and is scalable with universal domain applicability, including business organizations (Piboolsravut, …show more content…
Business professionals concerned in adopting the philosophy can now conveniently use the ten ‘Sufficiency Economy’ business does as a guideline in running their businesses without having to significantly understand the actual philosophy. Policy inferences have also been conversed. More research into the application of the philosophy is encouraged to further enhance our understanding. As His Majesty King Bhumibol quotes the Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy is “…Many people misunderstood thinking that the Royal insight concerned only farmers. In fact, this can be applied by people from all walks of life, whether merchants, businessmen, government officials and
Throughout the 19th century, industrialization was a turning point in the United States that led to huge changes in society, economics and politics. The incoming growth of factories had positives and negatives effects. Two specific changes were the new government regulations and the increasing immigration. These changes were extremely important because they settled the bases of the country.
There are three kinds of economic systems. They are as follows. One is an economic system with the name of “custom based economy”, it is a system that is mostly found in the third world countries. In the system, every child of every generation will be thought to use the same ideas to produce the same good...
Throughout history, many different types of economic models and theories have been developed. These different philosophies of business often were an important and integral part of a government’s basic structure. For example communist countries like China and the Soviet Union practiced a type of socialism. While, democratic nations like the United States and Canada practice forms of capitalism. Also within these economic models exists different theories as well such as Keynsian economics and laissez faire economics. To understand how these types of economies work in the world today, it is important to study and define a variety of economic systems. Researching such economic systems as capitalism and socialism, and also looking at the ideas of laissez faire and the Keynsian economics, a person will start to have a better understanding of how business works in the world today.
Common Sense Economics: What Everyone Should Know About Wealth and Prosperity, written by James Gwartney, Richard Stroup, Dwight Lee and Tawni Ferrarini, explains the foundation of economics and how it all works in all aspects of our lives from the role of the government trickling down to personal credit cards and savings. This book was written with clear language for the audience to understand and comprehend the large amount of information within its condensed size. The authors’ target audience for this book seemed to be for those individuals wanting to learn the mechanics of economy including economic growth and stability. Gwartney separates his book into four parts: Part I, Twelve Key Elements of Economics, Part II Seven Major Sources of Economic Progress, Part Three Economic Progress and the Role of Government, and Part IV Twelve Key Elements of Practical Personal Finance.
Efficiency is concerned with the optimal production and allocation of resources given existing factors of production while equity is concerned with how resources are distributed throughout society (Pettinger, 2010). The equity-efficiency trade-off is an economic situation in which there is a perceived tradeoff between the equity and efficiency of a given economy. This tradeoff is commonly viewed within the context of the production possibility frontier, where any additional gains in production efficiency must be offset by a reduction in the economy 's equity. Within this equity and efficiency tradeoff, equity refers to the economy 's financial capital, while efficiency refers to the future efficiency in the production of goods and services. This theory asserts that, in order for a nation to
Classical economists such as, Jean Baptiste Say, Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Thomas Robert Malthus, had a different view about the role of the government in a capitalistic society. The classical economists believed in a laissez-faire economy. They believed that the government should keep their hands off the nation’s economy. They felt that the market will be able to keep itself stable, without the intervention of the government. Jean Baptiste Say believed that supply would create its own demand. The classical economists had an assumption that the aggregate production of goods and services in the economy generate enough income to purchase all output. They also had the assumption that savings by the household sector matches investment expenditures on capital goods by the business sector.
In this paper I aim to tie the concepts of behavioral economics to issues in health economics. The goal is to use economics and psychology to explain how patients or physicians stray from the assumptions of the standard economic theory. In it through behavioral economic concepts that help researchers analyze and forecast patient or physician behavior. Behavioral economics has neumerous applications in the medical care field and these ideas can be used to create better health outcomes and stronger policies. I will be observing the economic issue of asymmetric information in certain spaces in the medical care field. According to the standard economic theory decision makers are fully informed have rational preferences with the aim to maximize utility. Behavioral economics literature examines patient and physician decision making through a variety of lenses such as the concepts of radical uncertainty and visceral factors. Through research and observation it is only “rational” to apply concepts of behavioral economics. In this sector uncertainty hovers above every decision where patients have limited information that influence decisions in the environment of fear make choices in the context of fear and trust in the physician. Every situation the medical field is unique to its own and this creates a great deal of uncertainties. These uncertainties can infiltrate decisions about diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Since this is such a broad subject I will narrow it down to a few topics to explain the ideas. I will try to show patient and physician decision making capacity in risk situations and use the example of end of life care to make the argument tangible.
Throughout history the world has experienced several types of socio-economies, from Mussolini’s fascism to Mao’s communism. All of those economies have its weaknesses and strengths and most have countries that can validate its effectiveness. However, to decide which economy is truly better for society, there has to be criteria on which to judge the economy’s effectiveness. So what is a society? In essence, it is a network of bonds we as human beings forged under the assumption, that working together we can all be happier than if we were only looking out for ourselves. With society, everyone is able to concentrate on what they do best, reap the benefits from the skills of others, and avoid the conflict that would arise otherwise. Thus, it follows that the ultimate goal of society is the happiness of everyone. And currently, there is only one economy that has staved off the test of time and reached that goal. Capitalism, with its merit system, flexible cost adjustments, and by having no other economic contenders is able to achieve a better society than any other socio-economic system can.
We probably all agree that the primary objective of any business is to achieve revenue and attain a certain profit. But then here is the question that we might ask, is profit the only element that should be considered when making business decisions? In my point of view the answer is no as I will try to demonstrate throughout this paper. One quick alternative of what should be the first top priority of a business is creating a customer as Dr.Peter Drucker said. According to him “The customer is the foundation of a business and keeps it in existence. He alone gives employment. To supply the wants and needs of a consumer, society entrusts wealth-producing resources to the business enterprise.” (Santayana, George. Is The Tyranny Of Shareholder Value Finally Ending? )
The first topic that will be tackled is whether or not a leader, or country, should be stingy. For this topic Machiavelli was said that if his “economy makes his income adequate… he can carry through enterprises
Capitalism has never been dead and will be here for at least the next century. In a world where the market is filled with imperfections, it is in order for the government to interfere to restore order in the market. Increased concerns over the 2008 market collapse prompted the government’s to take charge of their responsibility and act. Capitalism is a system of government that favours individual growth with minimal government interference. The opposite of capitalism is communism, where the property owner is the state, and the main aim is social welfare enhancement. A mixed economy embraces the two and balances between the extremes. Many countries across the globe have adopted a mixed economy as it reduces the losses suffered by the countries that practice the extremes. Capitalism has been known to be responsible for growth of economies among them, the United States, Britain, and other developed countries. In this essay, we shall examine the future and nature of capitalism in the light of a mote communist future.
The Industrial Revolution was a period from the 18th to the 19th century where major changes in agriculture, manufacturing, transport, and technology had a profound effect in North America. The industrial revolution marked a major turning point in history because it changed every aspect of life in America and the country as a whole. People started replacing ploughs and other tools for machines that could do twice the work. While others moved to large cities and started working in factories and other businesses. Huge industries such as the textile, steel, and coal industry came out and had a profound effect on the industrial revolution but, they would not have been extremely successful if it was not for railroads. The railroads played a vital role in the development and success of other industries. The railroads triggered the biggest leap in transportation in history. Through technological and entrepreneurial innovations and the creation of steam-powered locomotives, the development of trains as public carriers of passengers and freight, brought forth the railroad. The railroad industry changed the nature of production because it became an important energy source that replaced human and animal power. Due to the important role of the railroads, workers became more productive, items were being shipped more quickly, and resources were becoming available to everyone including the working and middle class and not only the wealthy. The railroads became to be known as one of the biggest leaps of transportation in history. This is because it set up the next fifty years of America’s prosperity. The railroads became extremely popular and useful during the 1800’s to millions of people and other large companies. Although there were many indu...
Today, more than ever, there is great debate over politics and which economic system works the best. How needs and wants should be allocated, and who should do the allocating, is one of the most highly debated topics in our current society. Be it communist dictators defending a command economy, free market conservatives defending a market economy, or European liberals defending socialism, everyone has an opinion. While all systems have flaws and merits, it must be decided which system is the best for all citizens. When looking at the financial well being of all citizens, it is clear that market economies fall short on ensuring that the basic needs of all citizens are met.
There were many revolutions that happened throughout the world. The one that really shaped modern day society was the Industrial Revolution in Britain during the 18th and 19th centuries. It changed the whole of Britain and would later change the world. Despite the early social problems of child labour and sanitation created by the Industrial Revolution, its long-term social reforms including; the Factory Act and the Public Health Act outweighed the short-term issues encountered.
Can a person’s worth be measured? Every person’s value or purpose in life is quantifiable by the economic worth of each individual. Those who are a burden to society by not being able to reach financial balance and must rely on others to provide and therefore are seen as dispensable. This is book argues that human life has no worth and we are only valued for what we can provide for those around us. Thus, those who can provide more to those around us are more successful in life. Within the book The Unit, a single person’s purpose and value in life is quantifiable to the economic worth of every other individual.