More handpicked essays just for you.
The negative effects of colonialism on sub-Saharan Africa
The negative effects of colonialism on sub-Saharan Africa
The negative effects of colonialism on sub-Saharan Africa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
British vs. African Perspective on imperialism
Imperialism is when a government expands their land by force or influence. The British are a very good example of a country using imperialism. The British and the Africans had very different perspectives on how the imperialism affected them and their way of life. British were more on the positive side and the Natives were on the negative side.They first wanted to expand because new lands having lots of natural resources. South Africa had many wanted items like gold, tin, diamonds, and copper. The British want this land because it would bring more money to the British economy. Another very important reason for imperialism is that new land would open up a new market of people to sell to. The
…show more content…
British liked this because they wanted a lot more power and this limited the people of the new colony to only be able to buy good from the British. One last reason for expansion is that the belief that Europeans are superior to any other country. The British were so into the idea of nationalism that they believed that it was their right and their duty to take over the other land and bring them British rule. The British had a very positive look on their expansions in to Africa. The British thought that it was positive because they brought new technology, they reduced local warfare, and improve sanity and brought hospitals and schools. The new technology that was brought to Africa was very important in the way that it caught them up with all outside society.
If this did not happen Africa Would still be behind in the society. The next positive is that they reduced the local warfare. They think that they solved all of the Africa's war problems but they are just acting as bait keeping the Africans busy. The Africans were to busy fighting the British that they could not fight each other. One last positive outcome the British brought to Africa was the new sanity, hospitals, and public schools. This is good because they educated the Africans but it caused them to lose their traditions and cultures. The better sanity lead to surviving Africans having a longer life span. With the hospitals they could better treat disease and other sicknesses. The British thought their coming was good but the Africans thought …show more content…
different. The Africans think that the British coming to their land was bad because they lost thousand of people to battles, lost control of their land and they lost all of their traditions and cultures. The Africans know that the British were a bad thing because they killed thousands of natives in battles. The British had machine guns that wiped out the African population. The Africans also lost their land and control of it. The British used force to take over the land, they grouped up people that have been rivals for many generations and expected them to live together in peace. The Africans also lost their cultures because of the way they were forced in schools, wear their clothes and their languages. They had to adjust to the European ways. I agree with the Africans view on the British coming to Africa and imperialising on their land. I believe this because Africa and their people have rights. They at least should have been able to say how they would be grouped together because some tribe have been enemies for generations. They can’t just come together and live like one country. Also the African lost many of their people to battles that could have been worked around and not fought. The Africans were not in for a fair fight the British were prepared to kill them all, they used their most powerful gun against them. They had no chance of survival. The British did what the definition of imperialism meant, to expand land by force or by influence.
The British chose force. The positives were that the British stopped local warfare, brought in new technology, and new sanity/hospitals and schools. The New sanity made people that survived live way longer because they could kill disease before it can kill. New technology brought the country up to speed in the world. Although there was good things there was also bad things that the Africans believed. The British pushing battles on Africa killed thousands of native people, they also lost control of their land, and also lost their cultures to the British ways. The British nearly wiped out the African population, took their land with no negotiating, and made them learn new languages and ways to dress and their religion. The British and Africans have different perspectives on weather that the imperialism was good or bad, I think it had a mainly bad
impact.
Throughout the 19th century, European Imperialism had a major effect on Africa. As countries expanded in terms of wealth, resources, and innovation, more territory and workers were needed. The first solution to solve these problems was to begin colonizing in Africa. The driving force for imperialism in Europe and Africa was mainly economical. This economical approach was established through many ways including cultural and nationalistic ideas.
By 1885, little to no independent countries existed throughtout the whole African continent. This was due to the imperialism done by strong European countries. Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Belgium, and Spain are to blame. There are many possible contributing factors as to why the European countries decided to completely carve up Africa, split it up, imperialize the whole of the continent. Because of the need for resources Africa could supply, the European desire for power, and the European's reaction to the White Man's burden, they took control of almost every square mile in Africa through imperialization.
Imperialism is the domination of a weaker country by a stronger country. For instance Britain dominated India and China in the mid 1880s to the beginning of the 20th century. Imperialism has had both a positive and negative effects on the countries involved. Britain was imperialistic for many reasons, it could dominate because it had the technology and power to do so. They also needed land to acquire raw materials for growing markets.
In conclusion, the motives concerning imperialism in Africa are a matter of expanding empires, helping natives, and natural resources. Europeans countries constantly tried to compete with their neighbors in fair ways to become the most dominating country. Just as much as they took possession of Africa, their will was also to assist Africa on their right path and put an end to any dilemmas they may be
Imperialism had some positive effects regardless of how strict and unfair it was. Some positive effects can be seen in documents 2 and 7, which talks about what the mother nation gave to their colonized nations. These oppressors built them roads, canals, railways, and gave them education. They also introduced to them telegraphs, newspapers, and overall made them economized. Another positive effect can be read on documents 1 and 5. These documents show how both the oppressors and oppressed benefit from getting new resources such as raw m...
Imperialism is a policy of a country’s empire that extends its military power across other lands to get more contry of a area or region. England imperised the places that they did to ether get control over land. To get better access of trade, or just wanted to have more military power in the areas. The affected regions that England imperialized was intended to get access to more trade and to have a greater impact on the regions they were in.
A true saying is “Colonization often does more damage than contribution.” Colonialism encouraged Africa’s development in some areas, but in many others it severely damaged the natural progress of the continent. If colonialism was never imposed on Africa, Africa’s developments would be significantly different and many of the problems that the continent faces now would not exist today. In conclusion, at first it seems that colonialism has both positive and negative effects, but the truth is it only damages the colonized nation.
Europe, in the late 1800’s, was starting for a land grab in the African continent. Around 1878, most of Africa was unexplored, but by 1914, most of Africa, with the lucky exception of Liberia and Ethiopia, was carved up between European powers. There were countless motivations that spurred the European powers to carve Africa, like economical, political, and socio–cultural, and there were countless attitudes towards this expansion into Africa, some of approval and some of condemnation.
Throughout the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, almost every country in Africa was imperialized by other countries in Europe. To imperialize is to conquer another country, whether it be in the means of politics, economics and/or culture, and control that land. The aftermath for the imperialized country was either beneficial or harmful. The amount of African countries that a European country imperialized varied. Great Britain imperialized fifteen countries in Africa, including Egypt in 1882, Sierra Leone in 1808, and the Union of South Africa in 1910. Although Great Britain’s reasons to imperialize were selfish, Britain helped each country progress afterwards.
The English also built many institutions in India and set up a productive government. "They have framed wise laws and have established courts of justice"(The Economic History Of India Under Early British Rule). In addition to all these positive effects, Britain also linked India to the modern world through modern science and modern thought. However, where the is good, there has to be bad. British colonization of India had its drawbacks.
Imperialism in Africa took root in the late 19th century when European nations divided up the continent for their own benefit. Each nation practiced a certain type of rule over the Africans of which they conquered. For example, the Germans, the Dutch, and the French used the practice of Direct Rule over their colonies in Africa. This system is characterized by the colonizers need for the colonized to become assimilated into their culture. The purpose of this was to make the African people “civilized” and act like Europeans. The governing administrations forced on the native inhabitants by the colonial power were meant to undermine those institutions set in place by the indigenous people. By taking over the community’s government on all levels,
Imperialism is the policy or action by which one country controls another country or territory. Most such control is achieved by military means to gain economic and political advantages. Such a policy is also called expansionism. An expansionist state that obtains overseas territories follows a policy usually called colonialism. An imperialist government may wish to gain new markets for its exports, plus sources of inexpensive labor and raw materials. A far-flung empire may satisfy a nation's desire for military advantage or recognition as a world power.
Imperialism was a time period in which more developed nations colonized less developed nations. The developed nations took advantage of the less developed nations resources, people, lands, and much more. Many countries lost their freedom and independence due to imperialism, however, they also received new technologies and innovations.
Imperialism is the domination by one country of political, economic, or cultural life of another country or region and occurred during the 1800’s in Africa. Imperialism in Africa was caused by four factors in Europe: economy, politics/military, humanitarian/religion, and Social Darwinism (Ellis). The Industrial Revolution in Europe caused the need for oversea expansion because the manufacturers needed things like: rubber, petroleum, and palm oil all of which Africa had. Europe moving into Africa was also caused by nationalism, when France went into Africa so did Britain (Ellis). The difference between France and Britain was the way of rule they used. There are four different methods of imperialism: direct, indirect, protectorate, and sphere of influence. The most popular were direct and indirect. The French used direct, they sent officials and soldiers from France to administer their colonies and their purpose was to inflict French culture on their colonies and make them into French provinces (Ellis). The British, however, used indirect, they used chiefs to oversee their colonies and encouraged the children in the colonies to get education in Britain. The British “Westernized” their colonies and only used military force when threatened (Ellis).
Throughout history, imperialism has led countries to extend their rule over weaker countries and then colonized those countries to expand their own power. Imperialism allows the ruling countries to use the weaker countries for their resources. Colonizing other countries would then lead to growth and a better reputation for the dominating country. There are many examples of imperialism throughout European history. When many European countries “scrambled” for Africa, it seemed as though Africa had no say in anything.