Effectiveness of the Tory and Whig Arguments Prior to the American Revolution

837 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Roles of propaganda in the american revolution

Effectiveness of the Tory and Whig Arguments Prior to the American Revolution

In the eighteenth century, the American Revolution played a vital role

in determining the future of the American colonies. Prior to the

Revolution, propagandas from both the Tories and Whigs influenced the

choices that Americans make. Both sides exchanged attacks and

accusations in their publications, while also presenting realistic

evidence and logical reasoning to back their doctrine and arguments.

Two of the many documents preceding the Revolution are especially

interesting in terms of their structure of presentation. Letters of a

Westchester Farmer, composed by Reverend Samuel Seabury, offers

arguments favouring the Tories’ view and questions the effects the

Revolution will have on Americans. In response, Common Sense, written

by Thomas Paine, presents the Whigs’ view of the Revolution and

provides strong valid reasons to answer most of the charges made by

the Tories. Both Letters of a Westchester Farmer and Common Sense

share similarities and differences in their structure and evidence

that affect the degree of their effectiveness.

The structures of Letters of a Westchester Farmer and Common Sense

play a critical role in effectiveness. In Letters of a Westchester

Farmer, the author first describes the current situation of the

Americans. It says, “The American Colonies are unhappily involved in

a scene of confusion and discord. The bands of civil society are

broken; the authority of government weakened…”[1] Samuel Seabury then

addresses the depressing signs of the upcoming revolution, and

gradually gives reasons for his charge. For instance...

... middle of paper ...

...f a live debate between the

two sides, with the Whigs winning on each issue. On the other hand,

the Letters of a Westchester Farmer completely expressed the Tories’

view, and made the Whigs and the Congress look evil, which was

effective to those who was not sure which side to take on. Despite

the differences in the degree of effectiveness that both documents

have, they both are well-structured and planned documents that

succeeded in persuading Americans to take sides with Whigs or

Tories.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Samuel Seabury, “Letters of a Westchester Farmer”, (1774-1775), p.26.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Thomas Paine, “Common Sense”, p.38.

[4] Samuel Seabury, “Letters of a Westchester Farmer”, (1774-1775), pg.28.

[5] Thomas Paine, loc. cit., p.39.

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of American Sphinx By Joseph J. Ellis

    1477 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, the author 's interpretations of Jefferson 's decisions and their connection to modern politics are intriguing, to say the least. In 1774, Jefferson penned A Summary View of the Rights of British America and, later, in 1775, drafted the Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms (Ellis 32-44). According to Ellis, the documents act as proof that Jefferson was insensitive to the constitutional complexities a Revolution held as his interpretation of otherwise important matters revolved around his “pattern of juvenile romanticism” (38). Evidently, the American colonies’ desire for independence from the mother country was a momentous decision that affected all thirteen colonies. However, in Ellis’ arguments, Thomas Jefferson’s writing at the time showed either his failure to acknowledge the severity of the situation or his disregard of the same. Accordingly, as written in the American Sphinx, Jefferson’s mannerisms in the first Continental Congress and Virginia evokes the picture of an adolescent instead of the thirty-year-old man he was at the time (Ellis 38). It is no wonder Ellis observes Thomas Jefferson as a founding father who was not only “wildly idealistic” but also possessed “extraordinary naivete” while advocating the notions of a Jeffersonian utopia that unrestrained

    Read More

  • Dbq The Beliefs Of The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    576 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Federalists and Anti-federalists shared the common beliefs of John Locke’s Enlightenment ideals such as all men were born equal (even though most of these men owned slaves), but their opinions about the role of government were different. Both parties had their own visions of how a new government would function and how the Constitution would support the government being proposed. Many argued that the Articles of Confederation had created a very weak government with very limited power. Specifically, the amount of power or the absence of power of a central government was the main disagreement between the Federalists and Anti-federalists. As a result, the Federalists and Anti-federalists argued about the ratification of a new constitution, which would give the central government more power.

    Read More

  • Comparing Thomas Paine's Common Sense and Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence

    1125 Words  | 3 Pages

    Thomas Paine constructs Common Sense as an editorial on the subject of the relationship between the Colonies and Great Britain. Through the paper, he hopes to educate his fellow Americans about this subject. In his introduction, he says he feels that there is 'a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong'; which 'gives it a superficial appearance of being right'; (693). He is alluding to the relationship, also calling it a 'violent abuse of power'; (693). This choice of words is similar to those of Jefferson, who asserts that the king had established an 'absolute tyranny'; over the states. Both men set an immediate understanding about their feelings towards the rule of Great Britain over the States. However, where Common Sense seems to be an opinionated essay, Thomas Jefferson writes somewhat of a call to battle. Paine generally seems to be alerting his readers to the fact that there is more going on than they are aware of. Jefferson, on the other hand, begins his declaration by stating, 'When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another'; (715). Unlike Paine, this seems to presuppose that readers are aware of the plight of the nation, and Jefferson is announcing that the time has come to take a stand.

    Read More

  • Paine and Henry´s Influence on the American Revolution

    963 Words  | 2 Pages

    The eighteenth century, a time of turmoil and chaos in the colonies, brought many opinionated writers to the forefront in support or refutation of the coming American Revolution. This highly controversial war that would ultimately separate the future United States of America from Great Britain became the center of debate. Two writers, both of whom supported the Revolution, now stand to fully illuminate one side of the debate. Thomas Paine, a radical propagandist, wrote many pieces during this time including “The Crisis Number 1” (1776). Through writing, he appealed to the “common man” in order to convince them to gather their arms and fight for their freedom. In this document, he utilizes many of the same rhetorical skills and propaganda techniques as Patrick Henry, a convincing orator, did in his famous speech delivered to the state’s delegates in 1775. Among these techniques are transfer, abstract language, and pathos. In both works, these were used to call the audiences to war. These influential pieces both contained a call to action which, through the use of strong and decisive language, aided the beginning of the American Revolution.

    Read More

  • The Arguments of Thomas Paine and James Chalmers Over the Revolutionary War

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thomas Paine wrote the Common Sense and in this pamphlet he wrote about America’s separation and independence from Great Britain. His argument stated that America is a large continent and we are in charge of our own fate and direction (Paine 107). Paine further explained that people migrated to America to escape the control of the King and his laws. Paine introduced a theory when comparing America to a small island, that it is possible if separated we can come together and make our own laws and run the country as we see fit (Paine 109). Paine believes that we are no longer in need of Britain’s help and that we can eventually form alliances with other countries as we stand alone outside of Britain’s control.

    Read More

  • Declaration Of Independence Rhetorical Analysis

    795 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Colonists are tired of the mistreatment and they are effectively severing all “Allegiance to the British Crown, and. . . political connection” (para. 23). The audience of The Declaration of Independence, the world, is specifically addressed twice. His opening paragraph introduces the context for the Declaration.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Common Good For All Americans

    1540 Words  | 4 Pages

    What was the common good for all Americans in 1776? Thomas Paine, a political activist during America’s struggle for independence from England, argues in Common Sense, a pamphlet published in the Pennsylvania Magazine, with the American colonists, demanding a revolt with the British crown (Thomas Paine). He passionately believes that the answer to the “…benefit of all people in [American] society” (Thomas Paine) will result from the freedom of oppression for the thirteen American colonies. Common Sense, “the most incendiary and popular pamphlet of the entire revolutionary era”, remains noted by historians as one of the most influential pieces of literature during the era of the American Revolution

    Read More

  • The American Revolution, A Fight for Colonial Independence

    1040 Words  | 3 Pages

    As a result of the French and Indian War, England’s attention became focused on the areas that required tending by the government other than North America, which provided the colonies with the one thing that ensured the downfall of Britain’s monarchial reign over America: salutary neglect. The unmonitored inhabitants of the colonies accustomed themselves to a level of independence that they had never possessed before, and when these rights were jeopardized by the enforcement of the Stamp Act after the Seven Year’s War, the colonists would not take it lying down. The colonies bound together in rebellion against the taxation without representation through boycotting the use of English goods, as embodied by Benjamin Franklin’s famous drawing of a snake; the “Join or Die” snake, as a whole representing the functionality and “life” of the colonies if they would work together, also forewarns the uselessness and “death” of the individual regions, suggesting that the colonies as a whole would have to fight the revolution against the Mother Country or else fail miserably...

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Common Sense And The Declaration Of Independence

    1073 Words  | 3 Pages

    Compare and Contrast Declaration of Independence and Common Sense When I was asked to read the Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson and Common Sense by Thomas Paine, I was kind of scared. As I started to read it, I found it to be truly interesting. Reading over them several times to make sure I understood the text and the meaning of them both. Throughout, out this paper I will share many comparisons and contrasts between the Declaration of Independence and the Common Sense pamphlet. There are many reasons why these two documents had a great effect on the American Revolution.

    Read More

  • The Second Party System

    718 Words  | 2 Pages

    This highlights that Americans did not like the sudden change of viewpoint and protested this by not voting for them. Henry Adams Observed, “Of all the parties that have existed in the United States, the famous Whig party was the most feeble in ideas”. This proves that the Whig party was not strong enough to change their views as society changed in the lead up to the war, which lead to their collapse, which ultimately lead to the outbreak of war.

    Read More

  • American Revolution: The Boston Tea Party And Taxation

    358 Words  | 1 Pages

    April 19th, 1775 the American Revolution was triggered by many of reasons, two of them would be the Boston Tea Party and Taxation. A group of Boston Patriates dressed as Native Americans pitched over three hundred trunks of cargo that was placed on the British tea ships, into the depths of Pearl Harbor. The reasoning behind the sneaky disagreement was the British government for the Tea Tax. The colonists were irritated because they were getting taxed by a distant government to pay for the debt from the French and Indian war that occurred in 1756 to 1763. Some of the Tax Acts such as, Townshend Act and Stamp Act were imposed and repealed.

    Read More

  • Take Up Arms Dbq Analysis

    606 Words  | 2 Pages

    England to Europe; America to itself,” (doc 6). Thomas Paine, the author of Common Sense, was trying to further unite the colonists and propel them into revolt. Britian no longer reflected the intrests of the colonies, as seen through the lack of representation, and thus America should separate from it. Eventually, the colonists were propelled by their anger at taxation to unite in taking up arms. The 2nd Continental Congress published “Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms” (doc 5) in 1775, encouraging the colonists to fight together against their British oppressors. The document lists a number of causes for such an act, the first one being the “giv[ing] and grant[ing] of our money without our consent” (doc 5). A call for representation in taxation had united the colonists against Britain to the extent that they were now willing to

    Read More

  • The American Revolution: Loyalists Vs. Patriots

    633 Words  | 2 Pages

    Despite its hardship, killing, and divisions between the colonist, The American Revolution is best known as the turning point of the colonies. Such an event that would change the world, but that is better said than done. Once the word came out about independence and fighting back the redcoats some coloinst were not up for it, these were called Loyalist. Those who were up to fight back were known as Patriots. The Loyalist and Patriots both have reasons why they think they are right in their principle.

    Read More

  • Revolutionary War Issues

    688 Words  | 2 Pages

    There were monumental problems that occurred between American colonist and British government that led to the Revolutionary War. Colonist were convinced they were just in their cause for independence from England. The American colonist who were once lightly governed resented the more forceful colonial administration (paraphrase pg. 119). The French and Indian War, also known as The Seven Years War, lasted from 1754-1763. The war was fought largely in North America and was very expensive to Britain therefore they raised taxes on American colonies. This was not well-received by colonists which led to political disagreements and the Revolutionary War.

    Read More

  • Radical Changes During The American Revolution

    436 Words  | 1 Pages

    The American Revolution caused a drastic amount of change. While this big thing was going on there were many people that had been included. The British and the 13 colonies went to war against each other so that 13 colonies could try and win over their freedom. Abigail Adams sent a letter to her husband to try and convince the writers to include women's equal rights. There were many hopes that people had while the American Revolution was present in the 1770’s to the early 1780’s. How much change did the American Revolution cause? The American Revolution radically changed three areas of life; social, political, and economics.

    Read More

More about Effectiveness of the Tory and Whig Arguments Prior to the American Revolution

Open Document