On May 27th, 2015, in Brooklyn, New York, Loretta Lynch delivered a speech addressing the charges and arrests of corrupt FIFA officials. A few class concepts that Lynch effectively exhibited in her speech are pathos, logos, and verbal delivery. Lynch exhibited pathos in her speech. The term pathos is defined as, “Using the emotions such as love, anger, joy, hate, desire for community to persuade the audience of the rightness of a proposition” (Mapes, 2019). Specifically, an example of this occurs toward the very beginning of her speech where she states that the individuals she was exposing were entrusted with responsibilities such as building soccer fields for children in developing countries and organizing the World Cup, but instead they corrupted …show more content…
Along the same line, those invested in this speech are most likely fans of soccer, and also the World Cup by default. Since the corrupt officials’ time was spent focusing on enriching themselves and participating in shady business practices, they would have clearly neglected their responsibilities surrounding the World Cup. Any soccer fan would be appalled to learn this, therefore Lynch’s exhibited pathos strategy was quite effective. Another concept that Lynch effectively displayed in her speech was logos. The definition of logos is, “The organized and logical arguments that are used to support a claim” (Mapes, 2019). Lynch utilized logos in her speech when she conveyed an example of how soccer officials used their positions of trust to solicit bribes from sports marketers in exchange for commercial rights to their soccer tournaments. The specific instance she named was how in 2016, the Copa America was hosted and instead of being an expression of sportsmanship, it was used as a vehicle in a broader scheme to grant the executives bribe money that totaled to 110 million dollars (Lynch,
Poor, young children being forced to work nearly 24 hours day is a terrible evil that is no longer necessary in the 21st century, thanks to those willing to fight against it. One of those people was lover of freedom Florence Kelley. At the National American Woman Association on July 22, 1905, she gave a speech urging the women to ally with “workingmen”, ln 89, to vote against unfair child labor laws. In her speech, Kelley uses appeals to empathy, sympathy, logic, ethos, repetition, word choice, tone, and current events to defend her case.
The Supreme Court has the highest authority in this country and throughout its existence the diversity of people in it had been lacking. On May 29, 2009 a new Supreme Court Justice was nominated, she was the first Latina to be appointed to this position and eventually was confirmed by the senate. Sonia Sotomayor’s nomination speech was a moment that brought joy to many Latinos who often did not feel represented in higher positions of authority in this country. She was the first to break the norm for this and in the speech she delivered to the country via new stations she was able to present to the country what qualified her as a Supreme Court Justice. Former President Barack Obama presented Sotomayor as a person
The Hawaiian culture is known throughout the western world for their extravagant luaus, beautiful islands, and a language that comes nowhere near being pronounceable to anyone but a Hawaiian. Whenever someone wants to “get away” their first thought is to sit on the beach in Hawai’i with a Mai tai in their hand and watch the sun go down. Haunani-Kay Trask is a native Hawaiian educated on the mainland because it was believed to provide a better education. She questioned the stories of her heritage she heard as a child when she began learning of her ancestors in books at school. Confused by which story was correct, she returned to Hawai’i and discovered that the books of the mainland schools had been all wrong and her heritage was correctly told through the language and teachings of her own people. With her use of pathos and connotative language, Trask does a fine job of defending her argument that the western world destroyed her vibrant Hawaiian culture.
On June 11, 2004, the former prime minister of Great Britain, Margaret Thatcher delivered a eulogy in honor of former president Ronald Reagan, she declares Reagan as a great man and president. Thatcher develops her ideas by analyzing all he has done using parallelism, repetition, and ethos. Using Reagan’s accomplishments and personal experiences, she amplifies how great of a man he was in order to make the nation comprehend what Reagan did. Thatcher opens her eulogy with “We have lost a great president,” indicating that the speech she gives with apologetic and heartfelt tone is not only to the American people, but to everyone else.
Anthony’s Speech ethos, pathos and logos are found in her speech. During the beginning of her speech it states “ I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen’s rights, guaranteed to me and all United States citizens by the National Constitution, beyond the power of any state deny”(paragraph 2). This quote is using pathos, Susan B. Anthony is talking to the audience and saying that she was deprived of her rights by trying to vote. She wants the audience to know that it was wrong for her to be arrested for trying to exercise her citizen rights and that she will prove and fight to get her rights.
Margaret Thatcher’s eulogy of the deceased president, Ronald Regan, had a purpose which was to comfort the people of the United States, and to brag on all of his policies that he created in his term. Thatcher uses various tactics such as antithesis, anaphora, and hyperbole to make her speech as appealing and comforting as possible for the American people. Using these rhetorical devices she is appealing to the mourning nation.
The movie , “The Great Debaters”, was produced by Oprah Winfrey and directed by Denzel Washington, the movie was written based on a true story, the movie revolving around the efforts of a debate coach and his team to be recognized among white debating teams, such as Harvard University. In a time, when the Jim Crow laws were common in the South and lynching mobs were around, the debate team coach Melvin B. Tolson, helped raise his debate team of young black students to the top.
Instead of playing with dolls and ribbons, eight year olds of the early twentieth century were working in factories making them. At this time there was no regulation or policies dictating when or where a young girl could work. In 1905, Florence Kelley delivered a speech advocating for the helpless children being sent to work by their parents. She emphasizes the need for change in the working environment and the underlying need for women sufferage. Kelley presents her argument with an appeal to the emotions, a call to action, and the use of examples in order to encourage the voter to put an end to child labor.
Florence Kelley uses an abundant amount of rhetorical devices in her speech to express her feelings about child labor. Kelley uses sarcasm, repetition, and imagery in her speech to explain her thoughts on child labor.
She uses pathos when she emphasizes the things women do that can relate to each other, she combines two fragments that can mean the opposite form each other but complement in a way "whether it is while playing with our children in the park, or washing clothes in a river, or taking a break at the office water cooler, we come together and talk about our aspirations and concern.” Here she talks about washing clothes in a river and taking a break in the office, actions two different type of people do. Solidarity is the main emotion she is portraying to the public. She touches hearts when she talks about the struggles some women go through to help their families the right way and how she feels for them “I want to speak for those women in my own country, women who are raising children on the minimum wage, women who can’t afford health care or child care, women whose lives are threatened by violence, including violence in their own homes.”
The goal of Hillary’s speech is to persuade her audience that her ideas are valid, by using ethos, pathos, and logos. Hillary is the First Lady and Senator, she shows credibility as an influential activist for woman rights. “Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children, and families. Over the past two and a half years, I’ve had the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my country and around the world” (Clinton 2).
On September 5, 1995 Hillary Rodham Clinton delivered a speech to the United Nations 4th World Conference during a Women Plenary Session, located in Beijing, China. Clinton spoke about how women around the world were not treated equally, how women rights should be equal to human rights, and the ghastly abuse and discrimination women faced around the world. The reason for the conference was to strengthen women, families, and societies in order to empower women to taking control of their lives and not be subject to such discrimination. She emphasized how education, health care, jobs, and political rights were not equal between genders and that the world needed to change. Clinton gave a very convincing speech because of her use of rhetorical techniques. The use of pathos, ethos, logos, and anaphora created a powerful, persuasive argument against the way women were treated around the world. Clintons main goal of this speech was to appeal to the audience and convince them that this is unequal treatment is an immense matter and needs to be addressed all over the world.
Hillary Clinton speech “Women Rights” transmitted a crucial message to the world and that was to do something about gender inequality. Pathos helped transmit an emotional appeal to the audience and make them see the soft side of Clinton. Pathos and Logos supported the facts stated to the public with evidence and compassionate words. The rhetorical device of repetition made it possible for the audience to realize the level of importance the topic had. Altogether made the speech have the great impact on people’s perspectives about women
Senator Barack Obama came to Germany to speak to the people of Berlin about the deep and enduring bonds Germany and America have with one another. Senator Obama’s speech was to use ethos and pathos to electrify and to motive hope to the audience. In Obama’s speech, presidential candidate Obama’s appeal to ethos is strengthened/ weakened by his appeal to pathos.
King continues with his letter, he is able to continuously use pathos to appeal to the emotions of his audience. In another example, Dr. King explains “You warmly commended the Birmingham police force for keeping ‘order’ and ‘preventing violence.’ I doubt that you would have so warmly commended the police force if you had seen its dogs sinking their teeth into unarmed, nonviolent Negroes. I doubt that you would so quickly commend the policeman if you were to observe their ugly and inhumane treatment of Negroes here in the city jail” (608). This is another effective way to persuade his audience since his audience has commended the Birmingham Police Department for the way they handled the peaceful protests in a non-violent manner, but they were not made aware of the violent and hostile tactics the police department used when they had the opportunity. On a human level alone, one can not advocate for the use of force when it comes to the treatment of peaceful protestors. Not to mention that these clergymen are commending an organization that they believed handled the manner appropriately, just to realize that they were wrong about that belief. This is an effective way to evoke emotion from his audience yet again. Dr. King’s continuous use of pathos effectively appealed to the emotion of the clergymen, and he continued his argument by using logos to further cement his