Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Edward IV’s early reign
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Edward IV’s early reign
Edward IV's Reign and Success Edward’s reign was mainly stable and successful. He was the first king to die financially solvent in over 200 years due mainly to his careful avoidance of major foreign wars and by the end of his reign there was evident recovery of prosperity in the southern counties. However, Edward died too early to ensure that his heir would succeed him unchallenged. He had not created a collective commitment to the future of his dynasty that would make his heir strong enough to survive a minority reign. Although this was his main failure, he did not wholly succeed in all other actions through his reign. Edward’s foreign policies appear to be eminently successful. The treaty of Picquigny in 1475 was beneficial for both Edward personally and England. A seven year truce between England and France was to be observed, meaning there would be no more costly wars or no chance of a French attack. From this treaty, Edward received 75,000 crowns and then an annual pension of 50,000 crowns. This greatly contributed to Edward’s solvency and also meant he no longer needed substantial grants from parliament. Also, as part of the treaty, the King of France’s son was to marry Edward’s daughter, so Edward had also ensured a diplomatic marriage for his daughter. Another aspect of the treaty was the removal of restrictions on trade between the two countries, leaving England to trade freely with France. It seems that Edward was very successful with his foreign policies. Edward took a personal role in running the country and was at the heart of his own government. He chose to use men with ability rather than nobility and even us... ... middle of paper ... ...he Marches of Wales in order to secure his son’s power base there, but this was not enough. Of course, his early death did contribute to his son’s usurpation and this was a matter beyond his control but perhaps he could have secured his son’s position if he had not relied so heavily on Gloucester or married into such an unpopular family, amongst other things. Edward’s reign was mainly prosperous. He had many successes in all aspects of his kingly duties. Trade and commerce improved, foreign relations improved, he died solvent and his treatment of the nobility and his councils was mainly sound. However, his over-reliance on nobles, his unproductive attack on Scotland and the Woodville marriage were all political mistakes that show that his inability to ensure an undisputed succession was not in fact his only failure.
Passage Analysis - Act 5 Scene 1, lines 115-138. Shakespeare’s ‘King Henry IV Part I’ centres on a core theme: the conflict between order and disorder. Such conflict is brought to light by the use of many vehicles, including Hal’s inner conflict, the country’s political and social conflict, the conflict between the court world and the tavern world, and the conflicting moral values of characters from each of these worlds. This juxtaposition of certain values exists on many levels, and so is both a strikingly present and an underlying theme throughout the play.
This was successful as it made another ally and it meant that contenders and rebels could use Spain either. However, due to the ties with France and the hatred between Spain and France and the fact that England had marriage connections with England, this may have been an unsuccessful move as France could have broken away.
training when he came to power in 1485, had managed in the time he was
Richard III's Usurpation and His Downfall Richards rule was always unstable due to his unlawful usurpation to the throne and his part as far as the public was concerned in the death of the two princes. As a result right from the start he didn't have the trust or support from his country. As soon as he became King people were already plotting against him. After he was crowned he travelled the country trying to raise support by refusing the generous gifts offered to him by various cities. However unknown to him a rebellion was been planned in the South.
The Loss of the Throne by Richard III There are many views as to whether Richard III lost his throne, or if it was a mainly Tudor advance which secured it. Overall I think that Henry Tudor did not actively gain the throne decisively, in fact Richard III lost it from making key mistakes throughout his reign, and at Bosworth. Richard weakened his grasp on the throne by indulging in a vast plantations policy which gave too much power to Northerners and inevitably made him dependant on these few. The fact that Northerners were given such a huge dependence enraged the South, and rid Richard of many possible backers during a war. Richard had also been so determined to suppress any rebellions and secure Henry Tudors downfall that he spent vast National funds on these ventures.
...tect his right to the throne. Ultimately, he stabilized the nation by settling the civil wars, the Wars of Roses, by marrying the apposing York family, to unite the two feuding families, the Yorks and the Lancasters. All together, King Henry VII is a new monarch for displaying all of the required traits.
have come to England to meet the king unless it was as important as an
Of all the absolute rulers in Europe, by far the best example of one, and the most powerful, was Louis XIV of France. Although Louis had some failures, he also had many successes. He controlled France’s money and had many different ways to get, as well as keep his power, and he knew how to delegate jobs to smart, but loyal people.
Minister to France in 1794. This was not all fun and games for James Monroe, for France was in the middle of a revolution, causing the Country to be highly unstable. This caused Monroe’s main job, which was to keep Washington’s strict policy of neutrality toward Britain and France, difficult considering he had to convince France that the U.S. was snot favoring Great Britain. This became almost impossible when America signed a certain treaty with Great Britain, and France grew frantic despite Monroe’s claims that it did not alter their agreements. U.S. politics finally doomed Monroe’s stay in Paris (Minister to France and
During the Black Death and the years after it, England had a strong king, Edward I...
The war would lead Prussia to the forefront on the European continent, however Britain clearly gained much more than any other did. France would not recover, and Louis knew all too well what lay in store when he said “ After me, the deluge.”
For hundreds of years, those who have read Henry V, or have seen the play performed, have admired Henry V's skills and decisions as a leader. Some assert that Henry V should be glorified and seen as an "ideal Christian king". Rejecting that idea completely, I would like to argue that Henry V should not be seen as the "ideal Christian king", but rather as a classic example of a Machiavellian ruler. If looking at the play superficially, Henry V may seem to be a religious, moral, and merciful ruler; however it was Niccolo Machiavelli himself that stated in his book, The Prince, that a ruler must "appear all mercy, all faith, all honesty, all humanity, [and] all religion" in order to keep control over his subjects (70). In the second act of the play, Henry V very convincingly acts as if he has no clue as to what the conspirators are planning behind his back, only to seconds later reveal he knew about their treacherous plans all along. If he can act as though he knows nothing of the conspirators' plans, what is to say that he acting elsewhere in the play, and only appearing to be a certain way? By delving deeper into the characteristics and behaviors of Henry V, I hope to reveal him to be a true Machiavellian ruler, rather than an "ideal king".
The father and son relationship is one of the most important aspects through the youth of a young man. In Shakespeare’s play Henry IV, he portrays the concept of having "two fathers". King Henry is Hal’s natural father, and Falstaff is Hal’s moral father. Hal must weigh the pros and cons of each father to decide which model he will emulate. Falstaff, who is actually Hal’s close friend, attempts to pull Hal into the life of crime, but he refuses.
King Henry VIII was one of the most powerful rulers in the fifteenth century, who had a very captivating life many people are not aware of. Most people know Henry VIII as a berserk king with too many wives, but there is more to Henry VIII than that. Many few people know about his life and what he truly contributed to our world. Henry VIII was an almighty leader in England who won’t soon be forgotten.
At the beginning of the novel Edward really didn’t have a destination about what he wanted to do with his life. At a young age Edward got secretly engaged to Lucy Steele, who was just as bossy and mean like as his mother and sister, but his mother disinherits Edward because Lucy has no money and comes from a different class. Mrs. Ferrars main concern is to make sure that her sons marry into wealth and a good social status. The Steeles weren’t as fortunate as the Ferrars. So therefore, Mrs. Ferrars wasn’t too happy when she found out about their engagement so, she disinherits Edward Ferrars. “All that Mrs. Ferrars could say to make him put an end to the engagement, assisted too as you may well suppose by my arguments, and Fanny's entreaties, was of no avail. Duty, affection, everything was disregarded. I never thought Edward so stubborn, so unfeeling before. His mother explained to him her liberal designs, in case of his marrying Miss Morton; told him she would settle on him the Norfolk estate, which, clear of land-tax, brings in a good thousand a-year; offered even, when matters grew desperate, to make it twelve hundred; and in opposition to this, if he still persisted in this low connection, represented to him the certain penury that must attend the match. His own two thousand pounds she protested should be his all; she would never see him again; and so far would she be from