More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection for pedagogy of the oppressed Chapter 1
The impact of education in our society
Annotated bibliography of pedagogy of the oppressed by Paulo Freire
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Globally, a great amount of emphasis is placed on education as it enforces and allows for social change. According to Freire (1993), it is through education that people learn to observe, understand, criticize and transform the world around them. Hence, the endeavour towards education is that it should become emancipatory thereby enabling one to be free from the control or restraint of another. Paulo Freire presented his theories surrounding the system of oppression that exists in society and its impact on education through his book, Pedagogy of the Oppressed. This essay will provide an outline on incidents that have occurred during my educational experiences and how they relate to Freire’s theory on pedagogy of the oppressed. The discussion
Researchers believe in order to combat discipline problems in the classroom teachers must develop clear expectations with learners and apply a range of rewards for good behaviour as well as punishments for misbehaviour (Canter & Canter, 2002; Swinson & Cording, 2002). However, by applying such measures in the classroom teachers act as figures of authority as they determine if learners are eligible for a reward or punishment based on their behaviour in the classroom. They then enforce the reward or punishment upon the learner even if the learner does not wish to receive it. Hence, they are seen as controlling and are therefore, according to Freire, viewed as oppressors while learners are viewed as the
During the lesson which focused on the topic about the National Budget, learners were divided into groups and were asked to discuss the answers to the following questions; “Why do people need to budget every month?” and “Does budgeting help individuals, businesses, the government and families to save money? By doing this, the teacher was allowing learners to find solutions to questions and encouraged learners to engage their critical cognitive abilities with their peers. Learners in this case were not passive recipients of knowledge but were rather creating their own through engagement. Freire (1993), states that liberation or emancipation of education should contain acts of cognition and not just the passing of knowledge. Hence, in the above educational incident it evident that the teacher’s role in the classroom is to guide discussion and pose problems to learners that would initiate and encourage discussion. The teacher in this case is not a depositor of knowledge and both the teacher and the learner learn through dialogue and critical reflection. This is referred to as Freire’s concept of the “teacher-student” and the “student-teacher” where through a dialogical process a teacher can learn from the learner and the learner can
Paulo Friere’s essay “The ‘Banking’ concept of education” is a short passage from his book "Pedagogy of the Oppressed" that explains the two primary types of education that exist according to Friere. Friere describes the two types of educating as the banking concept, which is briefly described as the transfer of the knowledgeable teacher, to the ignorant student "Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor." (Friere 1), and the problem-poser, which he describes as two way communication in which the students and teacher both teach and learn from one another "Through dialogue, the teacher-of-the-students and the students-of-the-teacher cease to exist and a new term emerges: teacher-student with
Freire talks of his home country of Brazil, and the primary method of education used there as being one in which students are treated as objects that need filling with information instead human beings with varying opinions and experiences. There was a belief that essentially all students learn best this way. However, Freiere saw it as more than that and tied the method to socioeconomic and political oppression. His view was that those in charge wanted to stay in charge, and that the best way to do so was to keep the people truly uneducated, or as Freire refers to them as becoming automatons, and disenfranchised. He saw the teachers as oppressors due to his experiences in his own educational career.
Freire disagrees with the traditional form of education when he says, “Oppression...is necrophilic; it is nourished by love of death, not life. The banking concept of education, which serves the interests of oppression is also necrophilic” (Freire 261). Freire argues that learning via oppression is the death of learning. Oppression is necrophilic, as Freire says, because, instead of appreciating intelligence, people hang onto the death of language and education. To some this may not seem important, but there is a death of learning and the practice of learning. The Banking Concept is not the way to teach. Oppression in teaching is more prevalent than thought. An example of this is when people only call attention to pitfalls and negativity instead of cherishing positivity and successes. This is not a beneficial environment for the majority of people. Freire and Plato both illustrate that darkness and oppression symbolize the dearth of
Herr and Paolo Freire, author of “Pedagogy of The Oppressed” have similar mindsets and writing techniques. Throughout Herr’s entire piece, he expresses his feelings towards college education in today’s society. As we all know, he does not approve of it. So, it is necessarily true that Herr thinks everyone should experience his time while he was in college with professor Ayoub. Like Stephen Herr, he is not the only one who disapproves of education today, Paolo Freire does as
Paulo Freire questions the theory that education is just a basic process consisting of just teaching between a student and teacher in Pedagogy of Hope. The text elaborates on the multiple components of teaching. Freire makes a valid point that the teaching style is an imperative factor in whether the student is able to comprehend the material. He lists four types of teaching styles. The first, authoritarian, the teacher is dispassionate to any input from the student. The second, permissive, allows the student full control of their learning with little to no teacher input. The third, intellectualism, is where the teacher is enamored and overwhelmed by the content of the teaching. The most important of the styles to Freire is dialogic/dialectic, engaging both the student and teacher in the content taught. This style is imperative to the students of today’s society because of the need to be free thinkers able to analyze critically and dialogic/dialectic is the only style with the capabilities to influence the mind.
In this method of education, according to Freire, students never think critically or develop ideas. The second type of education is labeled “problem-posing”. Freire makes it very clear that he is an advocate of the “problem-posing” method of education. He believes in encourages communication and better comprehension of what the students are learning. “Yet only through communication can human life hold meaning…the teacher cannot think for his students, nor can he impose his thought on them” (Freire 216). Freire argues that the only real form of educatio...
Freier stated that the educator was taking away the power of the student to think on their own which turned them into “receptacles”. Freier wrote, “Narration (with the teacher as narrator) leads the students to memorize mechanically the narrated account. Worse yet, it turns them into "containers," into "receptacles" to be "filled" by the teachers. The more completely she fills the receptacles, the better teacher she is. The more meekly the receptacles permit themselves to be filled, the better students they are (Freier 216). It seems like these great authors such as Walker Percy and Paulo Freier criticize the role educators play in the education system and urge students to break free the conformity of the way subjects are taught in school and truly experience them through our own dialectical
One teacher may adopt the banking concept while the other may utilize the problem-posing concept. However, while problem-posing education generates creativity by giving students the ability to communicate, banking education does not. Freire asserts that in the “banking” concept of education, “the teacher chooses the program content, and the students (who were not consulted) adapt to it” (217). Freire indicates that students, who are victims of banking education, have no control over how an instructor chooses to teach. Therefore, creativity is destroyed by the fact that it was not even permitted in the first place. Students are not able to express their opinions or solve problems using their own methods because in order to pass the class, students not only need to adapt to the teaching style of their professors but think like them too. Freire’s quote relates to experiences I have had with “banking” teachers throughout my twelve years of formal education. Those teachers only taught using textbooks, therefore, they insisted that the textbook was always right. If I were to solve a math problem using a technique different from the book, then I would not get points for the problem even though my answer was right. And if I were to interpret an open-ended essay different from how my teacher would then my interpretations would be wrong. By doing this, my teachers destroyed my creativity. I was prohibited from my own thoughts and penalized if I expressed them. The only alternative for me was to become a “robot” that followed the orders of authorities, but being a “robot” was not something I was ashamed of. In fact, my role as a “robot” led me to better understand the “drama of Education” in which teachers attempt to “regulate the way the world ‘enters into’ the students”. I was able to figure out that my own teachers had tried to handle the way the world “entered into me” by
Max Fischer cannot be summed up with a few simple words. A plethora of descriptive definitions is still incapable of summing up such a Renaissance man. Max is such an extraordinary student that he can be compared to Paulo Freire’s idea of a student, as explained in The Pedagogy of the Oppressed. In it, Freire disparages the modern education system, “the banking concept of education,” by noting its destructive abilities of creating complacent students who regard themselves as inferior by those above their educators. This method is based on the idea that the teacher simply force-feeds knowledge to students, only to have it regurgitated back at them (72). Freire is concerned because students are educationally restricted by this method, however
In today’s society, schools in wealthy communities are better than those in poor communities, higher income schools are simply better at preparing their students for their future. In the reading “The Banking Concept Of Education As An Instrument Of Oppression” by Paulo Freire, he believes that teachers are depositing information into their students. He states that there are two educational systems, the “banking concept” is when teachers are filling their students up with information but the students aren’t fully understanding the material. On the other hand, the “problem posing concept” is when the teacher lets the students communicate with each other. It opens the classroom to a learning environment. Especially when students are more comfortable enough to ask the teacher a question. Esentionally he prefers the problem posing concept. Futhermore, “Social Class and The Hidden Curriculum Of Work” by Jean Anyon an educator at Rutgers University, Newark. She researches how students of different economic backgrounds are interacting with school work and teacher interaction in their elementary schools. Also, she supports her research by looking at the various ways public schools provide particular types of knowledge and educational experiences of the different social classes.
Foucault and Heidegger, modern philosophers, both describe power in these terms, as the facility to manipulate an object without force. Understanding this point of view is important, not only for state institutions who attempt to exert power over citizens and deviants, but also for teachers as they try to use disciplinary power to control the events in their classroom. Unfortunately, the majority of status quo disciplinary systems are entrenched in the mindset that power can be exerted over individuals through the use of coercive punishments and threats, actions which usually have the complete opposite result, less control over the students. A system that more closely mirrors Thomas Gordon’s view of discipline as self-control would be a far superior disciplinary model because it recognizes the true nature of power.
“I do really believe, it had been totally impossible to have made it to submit by violence and force.” If an instructor teaches education with vexation and pressure, the students will only learn to hate it, associating it with anguish, therefore, becoming sluggish and uncaring when in the study room. As seen in schools present and past, children rebel against even the slightest bit of work. The work the students are given is completed in drudgery. From experience, children enjoy the classes that have good and kind teachers. Even if the workload is high, they appreciate how the instructor teaches and want to make them proud putting their best effort into their
Education is at the core of humanity and its teaching has been mistreated. Based on Paulo Freire’s theory, education has been torn apart from its truthful purpose. It is now used to alienate human beings instead of promoting unity. Throughout this chapter, Chapter 2 in Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed, he concentrates on the teacher-student relationship in classrooms. He sees education as information that is being passed on or “banked” from teachers to students.
Student discipline is affected by classroom management. The way in which a teacher manages his/her classroom delineates the type of instruction that will take place in the classroom. A classroom in which the teacher takes total responsibility for guiding students’ actions comprises a different learning environment than one in which students are encouraged to take responsibility for their own actions (Evertson, 2003). Many schools are reluctant to hold students accountable for their own actions. The education establishment warns teachers that they will be placing themselves in a questionable role if they emphasize rules, punish bad behavior, and reward good conduct (Bennett, et. al., 1999). Teachers need to create a learning environment in which students are encouraged to do their best and therefore, motivated to work to their highest potential. Teachers need to also set expectations and maintain the learning environment they have developed. Even in effectively managed classrooms, however, problems may occur.
The second chapter described the "banking" approach to education in which Freire suggested that students were considered empty bank accounts and that teachers were making deposits into them and receiving nothing back. The banking concept distinguishes two states. In the first, the educator cognizes a cognizable object and prepares a lesson. During the second, he expounds to his students about it. (67) Freire argued that the underclass could be empowered through literacy. He also pointed out that education could be used to create a passive and submissive citizen, but that it also has the potential to empower students by instilling in them a "critical consciousness." (45) Freire wanted the individual to form himself rather than be formed.