Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Oppression of disabilities
Advantages and disadvantages of special schools
Importance of vocational rehabilitation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Oppression of disabilities
The Education Act (1944) categorised all children with special educational needs by their disability and labelled them as ‘maladjusted’ or ‘educationally sub-normal’. It established eleven categories of ‘handicap’ and a partial acknowledgement that there may be certain benefits to mainstream schooling. Despite that, it was not until many years later that students with disabilities were accepted as individuals who had the right to a suitable education of their own. Until the 1970s many children with any form of disability ‘were excluded from the full rights of citizenship (Borsay, 2005), were considered ‘uneducable’ and taken away from their homes to spend their lives in institutions. It was not until 1971 that the ‘rights of the disabled child …show more content…
As a result of this ‘children with impairments most frequently found themselves in special schools, segregated from mainstream education’ (Wall, 2011). These certain choices about the education and placement of disabled children resulted in an ostracized population and society that has been ‘institutionalised, segregated, uneducated, socially rejected, physically excluded and made unemployed’ (Oliver, 1996, Carrington, 1999, Vlachou, 1997). This segregation of children with impairments was highly criticised, and it was argued than ‘any form of segregation on the basis of disability of learning difficulties is morally wrong’ (Lindsay, 2003), and integrating children with disabilities into mainstream schools was seen as the best move to make to end the segregation, gaining equal opportunities and the right to an education for all. Erving Goffman (1968) questioned the assumption that the separation, of part of the public into segregated institutions, was actually a good thing and pointed out that these types of institutions present themselves ‘as the rational and humane solution to peoples difficulties, but they in fact operate merely as society’s ‘storage
This report aims to recognize the contemporary statutory framework for identifying and working with children with Special Education Needs and Disability in England (The SEND Code Of Practice). The report will pay particular interest in discussing the key elements which derives from the 2014 Children and Families Act practiced in relation to the Department for Education (DfE). The report will pry into the current changes of the SEND code of practice, its assessment framework, why these have been introduced and who these changes makes a difference to. To discuss this the report will be looking at a variety of sources to better understand the most important details also includes but not limited to newspaper report, recent research papers,
Hehir, T. (2009). New directions in special education: Eliminating ableism in policy and practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
UK Centre for Legal Education (UKCLE). (2010). SENDA: Special Education Needs and Disability Act 2001 [Online]. York: The Higher Education Academy. [Accessed: 17/11/13]. [Available: http://ww.ukcle.ac.uk/resources/directions/previous/issue4/senda/].
These children were now being seen as a group in which society had obligations to provide “normalisation” (Bowe, 2007, p.45) and would lead to a revolutionary law being introduced in America. The Education for All Handicapped Children Act was passed in 1975, of which Australia became a signatory. (AIHW, 2004). This Act mandated “that all school-age children with disabilities must receive a free appropriate public education” (Bowe, 2007, p. 101) “in the least restrictive environment” (Bowe, 2007, p. 5). For the first time in a century, Australia no longer segregated these children into an isolated “special facility” (Allen & Cowdery, 2012, p. 8). State governments established special education units within mainstream schools (AIHW, 2004). This is referred to as Integrated education and is described by Talay-Ongan & Cooke (2005), as an environment “where children with similar disabilities in special classes share the normal school environment, and utilise some classes (e.g., art or physical education) or the playground that all children enjoy.” In 1992, the Disability Discrimination Act was introduced in Australia which specifically covered the topic of Education and in 2005 a set of supplementary standards was passed which specifies the support schools are required to provide to students with a
It was believed by members of society; people with learning difficulties should not be a part of the wider community or have the same rights. This opinion was reinforced when the government began to have large institutions built to house all the people described as ‘mental deficiency’: ‘idiots’, ‘imbeciles’, ‘feeble-minded persons’ and ‘moral imbeciles’. (The Open University (2011) DVD Unit 7, Lennox Castle timeline).
During the 1920's, separate schools were established for the blind, deaf, and more severely retarded (Reddy, p5). However, students that were considered mildly disabled were educated in regular schools, just thought to be 'slow learners'. Soon educators started to develop separate classes for disabled students. The reasoning for taking them out of the normal classroom (exclusion) has not changed in the last eighty years. People today, who are still in favor of exclusion, have the same justification for their belief. It was thought that students...
Under the 1944 Education Act children with special educational needs were defined in medical terms and categorised according to their disabilities. Many of those children were considered as ‘uneducable’ and were labelled as ‘maladjusted’ or ‘educationally sub-normal’, and they were given ‘special educational treatment’ in special schools or institutions. In these special schools (institutions) the rights of the children were not considered, as children were socially alienated from family and the society from where they lived. Though the grouping of children with similar disabilities looked positive in the past, such children were deprived their right to association with their peer...
Slee, R. (2001). Driven to the margins: disabled students, inclusive schooling and the politics of possibility [Electronic Version]. Cambridge Journal of Education, 31, 385-397. Retrieved March 8, 2010, from Learning at Griffith.
The World Health Organisation, WHO, (1980) defines disability in the medical model as a physical or mental impairment that restricts participation in an activity that a ‘normal’ human being would partake, due to a lack of ability to perform the task . Michigan Disability Rights Coalition (n.d.) states that the medical model emphasizes that there is a problem regarding the abilities of the individual. They argue that the condition of the disabled persons is solely ‘medical’ and as a result the focus is to cure and provide treatment to disabled people (Michigan Disability Rights Coalition, 2014). In the medical model, issues of disability are dealt with according to defined government structures and policies and are seen as a separate issue from ordinary communal concerns (Emmet, 2005: 69). According to Enabling Teachers and Trainers to Improve the Accessibility of Adult Education (2008) people with disabilities largely disa...
The main obstacle faced by students with disabilities in the attempt to achieve educational equality is the continuing debate over the In...
Children with disabilities are more in the public eye than years ago, although they are still treated differently. Our society treats them differently from lack of education on special needs. The society labels them and make their lives more difficult than it has to be becau...
1.3 HOW EFFECTIVE DO THE EQUALITY ACT 2010 & HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 PROMOTE SUBSTANTIVE EQUALITY Janes (2012) after exactly two years the Equality Act 2010 was enacted confirmed that the Act has been effective in promoting substantive equality through anti-discrimination and human rights in the workforce. However, the law and process to pursue individual human rights still remains complex (Janes, 2012). For example, employees taking and making claims seem to be a difficult road to tread upon since employers are generally highly resourced and sometimes use such opportunity to frighten clients into submission. Employers often push their employees to settle cases for much less than they are worth by threats of costs against them.
According to the World Health Organisation (2011), there are more than 1 billion people with disabilities in the world, with this number rising. Many of these people will be excluded from the regular situations we, ‘the ordinary’, experience in everyday life. One of these experiences is our right to education. Article 42 of the Irish Constitution states that the state shall provide for free primary education until the age of 18, but is this the right to the right education? Why should being born with a disability, something which is completely out of your control, automatically limit your chances of success and cut you off from the rest of society due to being deemed ‘weaker’ by people who have probably never met you? With approximately 15% of the world’s population having disabilities, how come society is unable to fully accept people with disabilities? In order to break this notion, we must begin with inclusion.
...eglected social issues in recent history (Barlow). People with disabilities often face societal barriers and disability evokes negative perceptions and discrimination in society. As a result of the stigma associated with disability, persons with disabilities are generally excluded from education, employment, and community life which deprives them of opportunities essential to their social development, health and well-being (Stefan). It is such barriers and discrimination that actually set people apart from society, in many cases making them a burden to the community. The ideas and concepts of equality and full participation for persons with disabilities have been developed very far on paper, but not in reality (Wallace). The government can make numerous laws against discrimination, but this does not change the way that people with disabilities are judged in society.
Prior to Introduction to Inclusive Education, I viewed people with disabilities from the separation perspective. They were the obvious group of individuals, the people motioning down the street with canes, walking with obedient guide dogs, parking within the blue lines, sitting in the reserved seats at the front of the bus, staring in the designated section to see the sign language interpretation, and the people who simply didn’t blend in with the rest. People with disabilities were different and incapable to perform like others; or if they could perform, they needed assistance at all times. I held this viewpoint, not because I wanted to, but because society played a critical role in my outlook.