Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Account on the merits and demerits of macro and micro economics
Five advantages and disadvantages of micro and macro economics
The importance of scarcity in economics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Economics, Scarcity, and Choice
Economics: is the study of choice under conditions of scarcity
Scarcity: a situation in which the amount of something available is insufficient to satisfy the desire for it.
- time and purchasing power are scarce
As individual’s, we face a scarcity of time and spending power. Given more of either, we could have more of the goods and services that we desire.
Resources: the land, labor, and capital that are used to produce goods and services
- scarce labor
– the time human beings spend producing goods and services capital
– long lasting tools used in producing goods and services physical capital: buildings, machinery, equipment human capital: skills and training workers possess
…show more content…
In other words, society faces a scarcity of resources.
Raw material – not long lasting tool Ex. Chalk
What to produce?
How much to produce?
How to produce it?
The World of Economics
Microeconomics: the study of the behavior of individual households, firms, and governments; the Choices they make; and their interaction in specific markets What happens to the cost of movie tickets over the next five years? How many jobs will open up in the fast-food industry?
Macroeconomics: the study of the economy as a whole Lumps all goods and services together and looks at the economy’s total output.
Positive economics: the study of what is, of how the economy works (deals with the facts)
Ex. If we lower income tax rates in the U.S. next year, will the economy grow faster? If so, by how much? What effect will it have on total employment? Normative economics: the study of what should be; it is used to make value judgments, identify Problems, and prescribe solutions. Normative analysis is based on positive analysis.
Why Study Economics 1. To understand the world better
- understand global and cataclysmic events such as wars, famines,
“Proper society did not think about making money, only about spending it.”, said Barbara W. Tuchman. This quote shows our real world, and the people that spend money, but they forget about the value of money. Nowadays people want more that they have. They forget how many things they have, and how much money they spend. Most people when they see other people having something better, and in that moment they want to have it also. Also, people forget how hard they got that money, but how easily and quickly they spend it. In the article “The treadmill of consumption” by Roberts, he says that people are willing to go into debt to buy certain products and brands. That is right that people can do crazy things to buy certain goods.
Severe mood swings, violent rages, memory loss—each of these problems were a part of my family life during the past two or three years. These problems are the result of alcoholism. Recently, a member of my family realized his abuse of alcohol was a major problem to not only himself, but also to those around him. He would lose control of his temper and often would not even remember doing it the next day. Alcohol became a part of his daily life including work, home, and any other activities. His problem was that of a "hidden" and "high-society" alcoholism. When he was threatened with the loss of his job and the possibility of losing his family, this man knew it was time to get help. After he reached his lowest point, he took the first step towards recovery—admitting his problem.
Drug use appears to negatively affect the health of the elderly at a higher rate than other populations (Benshoff & Koch, 2003). This may be a result of old age. So, it can be understood there is a biological effect of substance abuse among the elderly. The elderly are more susceptible to being admitted into the hospital for adverse effects of substances, while other populations of society are not. Benshoff and Koch asserts, “Intentional abuse of prescription medications to get high is thought to be rare, but over-use does occur among this population. Often this over...
Another reason why some utilitarian thinkers will support torturing these suspect terrorist because law enforcement is saving American lives. On the other hand, other utilitarian thinks will condemn torturing terrorist because affects a personal moral standards to conduct themselves as a productive citizen (“The ‘ticking time bomb’ problem,” 2014). An additional reason why some utilitarian thinks condemn torturing terrorist because it provokes intense psychological pressure to reveal answers that law enforcement may want to hear that’s incorrect. Furthermore, depending on which utilitarian thinker discussing the use of torturing a terrorist, the action could be justified because it prevents further or future injury. Additionally, other utilitarian thinkers would rebuke this action because hurting another doesn’t help people that have already been injured by a terrorist
This highlights that a core principal of economics is the decisions and choices to be made in order to manage limited resources. Furthermore, that microeconomics pertains to the behaviours that affect these decisions and choices made at an individual level. As demonstrated by the avocado industry recently, motives and variable factors for increases/decreases in supply and demand will not always be transparent to the consumer. Therefore, to have an understanding of the concepts of microeconomics and the market can elucidate the individual consumer’s decision making rationale rather than making
... torturer has a physical control over the tortured and targets his sovereignty to seek control over his decisions. However the tortured will survive and his will and autonomy is temporally broken but will eventually be restored because the torturing is limited in its humiliation however the autonomy of the victims of the terrorist act, if it happened, is damaged.
Torture can prevent the attacks resulting in terror or can go and prove no one, no one can infringe the right of Americans in the result of another attack, and therefore torture is justifiable. The similarities between ISIS and Al Qaeda is scary and torture needs to be in the back pocket of all officials to prevent similar disasters. The clock stopped ticking on 9-11, and anyone on the street can tell oneself where they were the minute they heard. The use of torture could save the lives of thousands, send the message that America is in charge, and can become more commonly accepted in the eyes of disaster. A ticking bomb could be going off at any time, it could destroy a spouse, a son, a daughter, a friend, a neighbor, or maybe the threat is to oneself, torture could get the information to destroy the bomb before it destroys one’s life. Torture is justifiable.
In summary, torture can be physical, mental, or a combination of both of these aspect, and must induce pain or an aguish to bring about the information being sought. Next, if you apply either utilitarianism or Kant to torture neither allows for the use of torture to be ethical. Finally, the need to end torture facilitates the need for the suspect to lie if only to have the pain or anguish to end. In closing, the use of torture by law enforcement personnel in anti-terror operations is unethical and immoral.
Economics is the study of how best to allocate scarce resources throughout an entire market. Economics affect our lives on a daily basis, whether it is on a business level or a personal level.
The crucial importance and relevance of economics related disciplines to the modern world have led me to want to pursue the study of these social sciences at a higher level. My study of Economics has shown me the fundamental part it plays in our lives and I would like to approach it with an open mind - interested but not yet fully informed.
Macroeconomics is the study of the economy as a whole, which looks at economic growth, unemployment and inflation. (Dobson and Palfreman, 1999) Government macroeconomics objectives can dividend into
Do the poor in this country have a choice not to be poor? Do the less fortunate have the same access to opportunities as the middle and upper classes? Do government programs designed to help the impoverished actually keep them in the lower ranks? These are all difficult and controversial questions. Conservatives and Liberals constantly battle over these issues in our state and federal governments. Local and national news media provide limited insight to the root causes and effects of the nation’s poor. There is obviously no simple solution to resolve the plight of these often forgotten citizens. Most of us associate poor as being in a class below the poverty line. In fact there are many levels of poverty ranging from those with nothing, to those with enough to survive but too little to move up. I believe many of our nation’s poor are so by their own doing. I will share observations and personal experiences to support the argument that being poor often is a result of individual choice. One needs merely inspiration and perspiration to move up the socio-economic ladder in the United States. We live in the land of opportunity where anyone with the drive and determination to succeed often can.
The diagnosis of this type of substance use disorder often is difficult because the symptoms of substance abuse can be comparable to the symptoms of other medical and behavioral problems that are found in older adults, such as dementia, diabetes, and depression. Many healthcare providers underestimate the extent of substance abuse problems among older generation, therefore, do not screen older adults. Seniors often live with or are supported by their adult children or other family members because of financial necessity and with their substance abuse it is placing additional financial hardship on supporting families, as well as the psychological damage. If the older adult’s spouse is present, they are likely to be an older adult as well, and may be perplexed by their partners new and disruptive behaviors and may not be able to understand the addiction. Therefore, their spouse may not be in a position to help assist in recovery. Their children may take on a parental, caretaking role. This role reversal can be stressful, painful, and embarrassing. In some cases, grown children may stop providing financial support, physical abuse, and assert emotional control because it is the only influence they have over the parent. Children may cut ties with the parent due to their substance abuse. Cutting ties have only increased the parent’s isolation and may worsen the predicament.
The use of torture has become a prominent matter of dispute as we enter an age of the global war on terror. The debate on whether it has become morally permissible to torture terrorists is argued by many as the legitimacy of such actions are brought into question in a world where global terror is outstanding. With the use of the ticking time bomb scenario, some make a desirable case that in special circumstances, there is a right to torture individuals implicated is acts of mass violence. Yet many would still argue that there are an array of inconsistencies hidden within the ticking bomb scenario and there are no circumstances where torture can be morally permissible, no matter what the consequences may hold.
The definition of microeconomics was presented a high level, and I was still left drawing a blank trying to discover how this method of social science correlated to my everyday life. Starting from week one Professor Julie Pelia assigned us topics that engaged our minds, and I quickly began to see how the various components of Microeconomics fit into my life. This summary of Microeconomics will cover some of