Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical essay "the day the earth stood still
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical essay "the day the earth stood still
The Day the Earth Stood Still: Movie Analysis “Your professor was right. At the precipice, we change.” The Day the Earth Stood Still were to films based on the same topic: preserving and taking care of the Earth. Although each movie had the same genre, characters, and underlying theme, there were many different aspects to each movie. To begin with, the graphics and setting of each movie are completely different. The 1951 version takes place in Washington D.C during the spring, and the movie is in black and white. The 2008 version takes place in Manhattan, New York during the fall leading into the winter, and the movie is in color. In 1951, there were movies made in color, but I believe that the movie was in black and white
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
are both set in a terrible time when the black community were slaves and treated like garbage. The only difference is one was successful and the other not so much.
...rtrayed differently in the movie. Lennie is shown as being very mentally challenged, whereas in the book he is just a little slow and has a mind of a young child. Although some changes are made in the movie to make it flow better, it is still based on the same story as the book. The movie has the same plot line and characters, and some of the scenes are told in the exact same way as they are in the novel. As well, the movie and the book give out the same themes. This story is about how all the people in the Great Depression were trying to escape their unhappy, lonely lives, but weren’t capable of doing so. The movie stays very true to the book even though some things are removed or added. Everything that is added or changed still works very well and captures the film perfectly.
A Film Comparison of The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951) and Independence Day (1996)
and the film was made in 1994. It was much more surrealistic because this version of the film was based on a young boy's dream. Setting The biggest difference between the two film is the setting and place.
Each version also has the main characters boarding up the windows. Anyone who thought the birds won’t attack are usually found dead, but in the movie they are found with their eyes pecked out. Also, both the story and the movie have REALLY bad endings! They aren’t very similar, but they both leave you hanging. When you see a movie or read a book you want to know what happens to the main characters. In these two, you didn’t get an ending. They left you hanging and for some people that ruins it all.
Possibly, this demand for realistic interpretation of subject matter is a major cause of the differences between these films; however, as was shown in this paper, there are also other reasons for the variations. 1931 was a time of poverty for many Americans who needed escape into a film where traditional values were upheld: where God wins; where men and women's roles are well-defined; and where order reigns. Coppola's version has been released in a time where the patriarchal system has begun to break down; where prejudice is no longer acceptable (still practiced, but not acceptable); and where we require everything to be extreme.
...the 2012 film. And unless you are paying close attention you would completely miss Myrtle Wilson played by Karen Black in the 1974 version and Isla Fisher in the 2013 version besides the party scene in the apartment and her getting killed she is barely noticeable. Jason Clarke played a less wimpy version of George Wilson and he was abusive towards Myrtle. And looked capable of murder and if it wasn’t for the book he would probably flee instead of killing himself. Scott Wilson looked like a sad puppy throughout the movie and very pitiful and it seemed as if Myrtle was abusive towards him. He looked incapable of murder but also as if he would snap at any moment and would commit murder. In the end actors in the 2013 film I would say showed a lot more emotion through and through instead of concealing it and that is something that I enjoyed more than the 1974 version.
Given the choice, would you choose hate or love? Most people easily answer “love”, but their following actions show hate. Fear of difference creates hate, and the difference is easily found in an ethnically divided country. Etel Adnan writes of the Civil War in Lebanon in her novel, Sitt Marie Rose, Tomás Rivera writes of the struggles of Mexican-American migrant workers in …And the Earth Did Not Devour Him, and Zitkala-Sa writes of the mistreatment of Native Americans in American Stories and Old Indian Legends. These three authors speak of social issues in the 20th century caused by direct discrimination and by the following feelings of the minorities in question.
The graphic novel was set in 1990’s during the time where the world had suffered from a nuclear war and everything was left destroyed. The movie was in 2020 and there was nowhere we are told that there was a nuclear war but there was a revolution against fascist government. This contrasts the book and the movie. In addition, Lewis Prothero was known as The Voice of Fate on his radio show in the novel while in the movie, he was known as The Voice of London but on a TV show.
The film that was produced after the novel has a lot of differences and not as
Even though the themes were similar, the plot of the movie and the play were rather different. In the movie, Mercutio, Romeo’s friend, got an invitation to Lord Caplet’s ball where Romeo and Juliet meet, but in the movie Romeo and this friends go to Lord Capulet’s party uninvited. What's more, is that when Romeo was at the ball he was recognized by Tybalt, Juliet’s cousin, from the sound of his voice in the play, but in the movie Tybalt sees him. In addition to that one scene where Juliet was hysterical because she thought Romeo was dead was completely absent in the movie.
We expect the film to be black and white, with no. special effects, to have a slow pace which would make the scene longer. than the B.B.C version, a lot of old fashioned classical music used as background sound, the use of Standard English and more archaic. language and we expected the characters to act just like they do in the book. We also expected the storyline to be exactly the same as the book, so it looks faithful and true. The David Leans version was made in 1946 so it is shot in black and white.
In the book it is supposed to be set in around the 1500’s. In the movie it’s supposed to be set around the 1900’s. The clothing changed to. In the book the clothing was Elizabethan style. In the movie they wore modern clothing. They even changed the families profession. In the movie they’re rich and royal families fighting. In the movie their corporations that are running against one another. Even how Romeo acts changed a bit. In the movie before going to the party, Romeo takes ecstasy; however, in the book he does not. They even changed how he snuck in the Capulet’s house. In the movie he only did it at night, but in the book he was never able to sneak in the house because of security. There’s also a small detail left out of the movie. In the book they had a clown, or jester. In the movie they had no need for a clown, or jester. They even changed the transportation. In the book they rode horses everywhere. In the movie there were no horses, they used vehicles instead. To give it a more modern feel, since it is in the modern
The Earth isn't flat. To some that is obvious. To others it's a bold statement. Many scientists and people argue about a topic that has a clear answer. Is the Earth Flat? Over centuries, people have debated whether or not our planet is flat. But now, with the advancements of science and technology, people still choose to believe and create groups or “societies” claiming the Earth is flat. The flat Earth idea is false due to use of science, common sense and an individual's own opinion.