Earl Rochester's Argumentative Analysis

433 Words1 Page

Earl Rochester’s argument is to make drinking a privilege to say, with a drinking license. This will require a “drinker’s ed class,” because it's just like driver’s ed, you have to read a manual and then take a written test what will be next a drinking portion to see if you can handle this “privilege.” I strongly disagree with Mr. Rochester not because I believe in underage drinking or alcoholism but because of the mere fact that this drinking license will not help since no matter what obstacles adolescents and alcoholics will find a way to get their hands on alcohol. A drinking license will cause a bit more trouble than expected, by that it will give people, adolescents, the reason to rebel and go against the law. You were an adolescent once, you know how it was …show more content…

Same with alcoholics one of many differences is they are way more sneaky, since a family member or friend will know about their problem, they will go to no means to get their hands on some cheap alcohol. Even an alcoholic can pass the written test once sober and then go off and get themselves some alcohol, there will those that are smart and will not get arrested so they can keep their drinking license. To no means will a drinking license solve the problems that alcohol has brought to people, certain people, not even banning it will help it did not work in the 1920s it will not work now. The Eighteenth Amendment did not stop people from making, selling, and/or drinking alcohol. They would pretty much do everything underground, you don’t think that will happen now too. A drinking license is just like the Eighteenth Amendment, a underground situation will startle up back into problem. Drinking may be a problem to some but there’s nothing that can be change 100%, there will always be something to ban or to make it a privilege, no one is perfect everyone has their

Open Document