Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis dystopian literature
Analysis dystopian literature
Analysis dystopian literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis dystopian literature
Dystopia and reality do not sound like even remotely similar ideas, but is reality truly the utopia we make it out to be? On the surface, “Once Upon a Time” by Nadine Gordimer and “Rituals of Memory” by Kimberly M. Blaser seem like two completely separate themes, as “Once Upon a Time” is about privileged white families separating themselves from the colors while “Rituals of Memory” is about different races coming together. But, with a more in depth view, one would realize that is not the case. The two articles wildly differ in how their communities are assembled, yet ultimately these communities, in the end, are still built upon their pre-determined racial boundaries. First, come the differences that seemingly separate the two articles.
In “Once Upon a Time”, Gordimer depicts a society that does not function at all; for example, “there were riots… outside the city, where people of color were quartered” and people lock themselves in their houses out of fear. But on the other hand, “rituals of Memory” shows people of different background coming together to pay tribute to fallen veterans. Next, Blaeser’s society may show division, but there is no evidence of blatant bigotry like there is in Gordimer’s society. The people of color were “quartered”, which is just a nice way of saying segregated. This shows the community’s fear and racist views toward that ethnicity. Lastly, the people in “Rituals of Memory” use the past division of the Indian tribes to bring together people of many cultures, while something like that would be impossible in “Once Upon a Time”. These three central differences show the contrast between the two passages. The similarities between the two passages are not as striking. “Once Upon a Time” is clever in the fact that its title implies the story will have a happy ending like a fairytale, but it actuality it does not. The home owners have plaques warning intruders not to come in. On these plaques is a silhouette with a mask on; this supposedly shows the homeowner is not a racist. Something so superficial does not make someone inherently not a racist, as shown by the segregation of the colored people. Next, in “Rituals of Memory” the community comes together, but when the omniscient narrator says, “...people would disperse again - to their own families,” one could get the feeling that they end up going back to their comfort zone; staying with people of the same race. Also, the narrator says, “We stood… together in a moment out of ordinary time… oblivious as well to the more trivial tensions of contemporary politics”. This shows that in their societies problems do arise between the Indians and European descendants. These two points, although more subtle, prove that in both passages the communities are being built on their racial and cultural differences. Although seemingly different, the foundation for both communities is the all too copious human trait of racial bigotry. Blaeser’s society may function, but there are hints of segregation, so eventually it will morph into something like Gordimer’s catastrophe. Ultimately, communities built on the human need to separate themselves from those of another race will fail.
After slavery ended, many hoped for a changed America. However, this was not so easy, as slavery left an undeniable mark on the country. One problem ended, but new problems arose as blacks and whites put up “color lines” which led to interior identity struggles. These struggles perpetuated inequality further and led W. E. B. Du Bois to believe that the only way to lift “the Veil” would be through continuing to fight not only for freedom, but for liberty - for all. Others offered different proposals on societal race roles, but all recognized that “double consciousness” of both the individual and the nation was a problem that desperately needed to be solved.
Internal conflict caused by culture is a concept that Edward Hall explores in his book “Beyond Culture”. In this examination of intercultural interactions, Hall argues that people are born into the cultural prison of one’s primary culture. He then goes on to claim that from people can only be free of this prison and experiencing being lost in another (Hall). For Coates, this cultural prison is the permeating fear resulting from the blackness of his body. His internal conflict is therefore created when seeing the world of white, suburban culture. Because this world of pot-roasts and ice cream Sundays seems impossibly distant from the world of fear for his black body, Coates comes to feel the contrast of cultures. He tells his son, “I knew my portion of the American galaxy, where bodies were enslaved by tenacious gravity, was black and that the other, liberated portion was not” (21). As a result of the shocking divide, Coates comprehends the burden of his race. Coates therefore feels “a cosmic injustice, a profound cruelty, which infused an biding, irrepressible desire to unshackle my body and achieve the velocity of escape (21). The quality of life between the culture belonging to Coates’s skin in contrast to the culture of suburban America creates for Coates a sense of otherness between himself and the rest of the world. Disillusioned, Coates avidly pursues answers to this divide. Coates thereby embarks on a quest to satiate this internal conflict of cultures, beginning his journey towards
concerns racial equality in America. The myth of the “Melting Pot” is a farce within American society, which hinders Americans from facing societal equality issues at hand. Only when America decides to face the truth, that society is not equal, and delve into the reasons why such equality is a dream instead of reality. Will society be able to tackle suc...
Have you ever gone to Chinatown supposing to find a culture full of African Americans? Probably not, because that is not where they’re expected to be. We live in a world where colonies of different colored people are expected, or otherwise discriminated into populating distinct spaces; African Americans are supposed to be in the ghetto, Chinese belong in Chinatown, and Caucasians reserve more elite communities. For centuries, each race has been striving to belong in a society where people are accepted as equals and certain jobs are not handed out to favored ethnicities. This form of discrimination has somewhat dwindled down, however, it still has an undeniable impact on the lives of every single generation since mankind was created. In Dionne Brand’s What We All Long For (WWALF), we view and contrast the lives of four different but very similar characters in which they negotiate different aspects of their lives in order to find their own unique and comfortable place in the powerful and diverse city of Toronto. The following essay examines the depiction of global spaces and the effects on diasporic identity through characters Tuyen and Carla from WWALF. I will analyze and contrast the adaptation of the characters to the city, the influence from the characters’ homes, and the connection to the emotional spaces; illustrating the effects on identification.
The word "dystopia" traces its roots back to the Greek word “dys,” meaning bad, and “topos,” meaning place. The government is never questioned by the citizens in a dystopian society. The people are either too scared to speak up against the injustices being performed in their society or become brainwashed. Bernard Marx from Brave New World and Winston Smith from 1984 are two different characters from two different dystopias. Both have been woken from the stupor of obedience their governments put them in and begin questioning their society. What they find is more dangerous, hopeless, and horrible than they could have imagined. Dystopian societies can be identified by the unique characteristics of its government by using examples from Brave New
Dystopian novels are written to reflect the fears a population has about its government and they are successful because they capture that fright and display what can happen if it is ignored. George Orwell wrote 1984 with this fear of government in mind and used it to portray his opinion of the current government discretely. Along with fear, dystopian novels have many other elements that make them characteristic of their genre. The dystopian society in Orwell’s novel became an achievement because he utilized a large devastated city, a shattered family system, life in fear, a theme of oppression, and a lone hero.
Human sacrifice killings is a horrific but devastatingly true reality for some that come too close to the jaws of the Matamoros cult. People usually think of a utopia as an amusement park or just an amazing dream. The dictionary version is often defined as “any visionary system of political or social perfection” (“Utopia”). A dystopia is quite the opposite though. Think of your worst nightmare and that is exactly what a dystopia is. The professional definition is “a society characterized by human misery, as squalor, oppression, disease, and overcrowding” (“Dystopia”). As it goes in 1984, the whole book is based on a dystopian society. Citizens have horrible lives which leave them dehumanized by the central government. They are also being under
It's hard to assign an irrefutable definition to the world nowadays - given its remarkably unfathomable state. The American Dream, the information revolution, two world wars, pornography, third world countries' independence and other benchmarks define the timeline of the 20th century (the near past). However, where has this left us today? Indeed the world exhibits an extremely ambiguous era that may be a prelude to a wholly different future than its past – far or near. Most significant in our present is the emergence of exponentially growing technology with unlimited abilities – simultaneously promising and foreboding - which has created a gap between the agenda of the minority that holds such technological powers and the majority's ordinary activity; it accounted for a circumference of negligence of the present's underlying powers and the future's potential ones.
You might be asking yourself, what does the word dystopian mean? The Merriam-Webster Dictionary definition of dystopia is “an imaginary place where people lead dehumanized and often fearful lives.”
I thoroughly enjoyed reading your book Fahrenheit 451, I appreciated the simplistic yet descriptive writing you provided to the readers. I delighted in how you sectioned of the novel into three different parts I found it easy to follow instead of the whole book being pulled apart in countless chapters. My favorite parts of Fahrenheit 451 was the dystopian setting, the outcasts, and the relationships.
Have you ever heard of a dystopian society? If you have not, I will tell you. What a dystopian society is in which each person in the society is the same. What that means is that no one is more athletic.No person is more beautiful or smarter than another. For example, in the short story Harrison Bergeron, each person in the society is the same and the government controls its citizens. I am against dystopian societies. It represents political oppression,and the lack of personal freedom. The society would be monotonous. In the coming paragraphs, I am going to provide details on why I am against a dystopian society.
The Black Power movement, a political movement that occurred from the late 1950’s to the early 1970’s, saw various forms of activism, all striving to achieve black empowerment. This movement happened during a time when African-Americans were struggling to define their personal identities in cultural terms. Many blacks chose to identify with their African roots, instead of their American roots, because they had painful memories associated with what it meant to be a black person in America. As a result, they strove to reject their American heritage. But, was that possible? “Everyday Use”, a short story by Alice Walker, addresses the complex ideology behind the Black Power movement and tries to answer what heritage really means to black Americans.
Throughout history man has always felt the need to envision and design ‘the future city’, whether it being one inspired by the concept of Utopia, ruled by technology or one that would go beyond the terrestrial limit of the earth. For a long time in western architecture there has been a fixed connection between utopia and architecture, in particular within the idealization of a ‘The Future City’. Its tradition to consider the Platonic discourse which treats of the idyllic city (the republic) as the first Utopia in this cultural thread. Thomas More nonetheless introduced far after the tangible term; who presented his ideal society as something constructed on a far away utopic island.
I have decided to write two dystopian fiction extracts, one aimed at adults (Great Leap Forward), and one aimed at teenagers (exitSim). Both of which have the purpose of entertaining the audience, however the adult extract is also designed to provide a political message and to provoke thought, a common feature of adult dystopian fiction. In terms of style models, for teenagers I have used The Hunger Games, The Maze Runner, Divergent, Life as we Knew It, and The Hunger Games: Catching Fire. For adults, I have used 1984, Station Eleven, The Giver, Animal Farm, and Wither. Whilst both my stories are dystopian fiction, they are made clearly different by the fact the target audience is different for each.
An utopia is often imagined as a perfect place, one without the major problems and worries of contemporary society; a dystopia however is exactly the opposite: not only is it an unpleasant place but one that is truly corrupt. In Utopia by Thomas More, a sailor named Raphael explains to Thomas his observations of a nation radically different from their own. The Utopians live in a communal society where all goods are public property and where there is no concept of money. At first glance, Utopia seems flawless, but a closer look reveals the inner darkness and failures of their culture. The Utopians’ expectation for maintaining an efficient society forces them to surrender their human dignity. Specifically, the illusion of perfection and purity