Dust Bull In John Steinbeck's The Grapes Of Wrath

831 Words2 Pages

Know to be one of the worst man made disasters of all time, the Dust Bull of 1930 caused thousands of families to starve as they searched for a new home. This event's occurrence was not a coincidence, but rather happened because of poor farming habits. The crops would suck all the nutrients out of the ground leaving a light layer of dirt on top. This dirt was then blown into the air thus creating the Dust Bull. John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath is a novel, which portrays a poor farming family named the Joads. The Joads, just like all the other farmers, were not able to pay the banks that owned their land. As the farmers were kicked off their beloved land they were forced to look for jobs and new land, but this would be much harder than …show more content…

The Joads moved across the country towards California. As they went through the state of Arizona, they pulled off the side of the road towards a river. As the men were floating in the river, two more men came up and joined them. As the men got to talking, the topic of California came up. He told the Joads that “‘She's a nice country. But she was stole a long time ago...You never seen such purty country-all orchards an' grapes, purtiest country you ever seen. An' you'll pass lan' flat an' fine with water thirty feet down, and that lan's layin' fallow. But you can't have non of that lan'. That's a Lan' and Cattle Company’”(279). The men the Joads are talking to are explaining how the large corporations and businesses own all of the land in California. Even though all the land in California is not being used, it still can’t be farmed on by all the farmers. Steinbeck uses the word “stole[en]” to describe the land in California. By using this word he is criticizing the large corporations for taking all the land. They didn’t just take any normal land but the “purty country” full of “orchards” and “grapes”. This imagery reveals how fertile and luscious California is. Describing California in this way, demonstrates how all the people there should be thriving, while instead they are living in slums and starving to death. According to this passage the farmers should have food to spare, but because of the large industries this is not the case. So ultimately, Steinbeck is critiquing capitalism. First, he shows how the family farmers, which are the majority of the population, can’t make a living any more. Next, he demonstrates that when the power is in the hands of the few rich corporations, the majority of the population is starving without jobs. Steinbeck uses the poor farming families to demonstrate the terrible side of our

Open Document