Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender issues in school
Gender roles and stereotypes in school
Gender roles and stereotypes in school
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender issues in school
The idea of race as a social construct is a controversial one to some. Dominant discourse on race has influenced people to believe that race is biological. It is often defined in terms of “heredity, class, ethnicity” (Bashkow 2006, 204). However, for the Orokaiva people of Papua New Guinea, ideas of race do not rely on the representation of a specific groups of people like in the West, but rather in the difference that they experience from their colonial encounter with the whitemen. This specifically holds true for food as the difference in what the Orokaiva eat from the whitemen becomes an important aspect in the cultural construction of race for them. These differences are aligned with qualities of weakness, softness and lightness, contrasting …show more content…
The same analysis can be applied to the construction of gender in the ethnographic situation that C.J Pascoe describes in her article “Dude, You’re a Fag”: Adolescent Masculinity and the Fag Discourse.” Pascoe conducts her research in north-central California at a suburban high school she referred to as River High in which she interviews the students on their ideas of gender and the “fag” identity (Pascoe 2005, 333). In the article, she suggests that ideas about gender heavily relies on the difference in the expression of masculinity. In River High, boys use “fag” to describe one’s masculine incompetence, heterosexual prowess and strength (Pascoe 2005, 330). Ben, a white sophomore from River High, explains that anyone can be a called a “fag,” even turning a wrench the wrong way can evoke such name calling (Pascoe 2005, 337). However, Pascoe explains that specific behaviors that render a boy vulnerable can generate the term and Ben demonstrates this through his example (Pascoe 2005, 337). Turning the wench wrong, for instance, illustrates incompetence, which in River High, is a direct link to a failure to embody masculinity (Pascoe 2005, 337). Pascoe further explains that other social practices such as “dancing, caring too much about clothing, being too emotional or expressing interest in other guys, platonically or sexually,” in River High is considered to be non-masculine behavior (Pascoe 2005, 337). It thus becomes clear ideas of gender in River High is formed similarly to the ideas of race by the Orokaiva people. While food became the central framework in the Orokaiva construction of race, the imposed masculine expectation and the “fag” identity was for gender in River
In the article “Dude You’re a Fag: Adolescent Homophobia” the author uses pathos and logos to convey the audience the main point of her article. Rhetorical modes such as exemplification and description are used. C.J. Pascoe is trying to argue that the word “fag” or “faggot is not mainly used as a homophobic slur within high school boys, but more commonly used to describe unmasculinity.
In Kimmel’s essay “’Bros Before Hos’: The Guy Code” he argues that the influence of society on masculinity is equal to or greater than biological influences on masculinity. In the essay, Kimmel uses various surveys and interviews to validate his argument. He points to peers, coaches, and family members as the people most likely to influence the development of a man’s masculinity. When a man has his manliness questioned, he immediately makes the decision never to say or do whatever caused him to be called a wimp, or unmanly. Kimmel’s argument is somewhat effective because the readers get firsthand accounts from the interviewees but the author does not provide any statistics to support his argument.
This is often done through playful flirting, but in reality it’s a boy physically dominating the girl through rough housing. This compulsive heterosexuality is also played out through bullying on those who do not fit the masculine norm. This is visible when Pascoe introduces Ricky, who is gay and visually rejects masculinity on a daily basis in front of his classmates. Ricky does so by being the only male that participates in choreographed dance shows in the school, cross dressing, and wearing hair extensions. Ricky shows true strength by maintaining his own unique identity despite white male students continuously harassing him for being too feminine or weak. Pascoe shows how Ricky’s strength is a positive element even though his peers attempt to deny his masculinity so that they could boost up their own. Yet, Pascoe undermines herself again by failing to analyze Ricky’s emotions and experiences and simply just shows them to the reader. As social researcher Pascoe is capable of analyzing evidence systematically, but instead makes the reader ponder whether or not she is uncomfortable with how overt Ricky is about her sexuality. Her word choice may even seem to appear that she justifies the violence against Ricky. When Ricky states, “this is the only school that throws water bottles, throws rocks, and throws food, ketchup, sandwiches, anything of that nature” (pg. 70), Pascoe follows up by telling the reader there is a law that protects students from sexual discrimination and that, “River was not a particularly violent school, it may have seemed like that to Ricky because sexuality-based harassment increases with grade level as gender differentiation becomes more intense” (pg. 196). By claiming that River was not a particularly violent school, despite Ricky telling her of his experiences seems to show that she does not believe Ricky and that
Although language manipulation can be broken into countless categories and sub-categories, diction is arguably the common denominator. When one conducts an analysis of another’s words, it is both logical and necessary for one to address the author’s word choice. Vàzquez’s essay is full of strategically placed adjectives and transitions to pull the reader to her message. She refers to society’s gender roles as being a “straitjacket” that “suffocates” (p. 493, 3rd paragraph). Both of the words “straitjacket” and “suffocates” not only embody the frustration felt by homosexuals, but also suggest that society is bound by its own unreasonable expectations. The author’s metaphorical suffocating straightjacket serves as a signal to the reader that society’s treatment of gender roles is in dire need of reform.
Race, which is another characteristic of demographic data, is a modern occurrence. It is being questioned and more than likely not a valid determinant. Our textbook in chapter five states, “racial identity or race consciousness is both controversial and pervasive. When early explorers in the 15th and 16th centuries came across people who were different from them a debate began which groups were “human” and which were “animal” (pg. 191).
‘Dude, You’re a Fag’: Adolescent Masculinity and the Fag Discourse - C. J. Pascoe 2005
Aaron Devor’s essay “Becoming Members of Society: Learning the Social Meanings of Gender” describes how despite popular belief, gender and sex are not directly related and how social norms affect individual’s choice of gender. Devor‘s main argument is that gender is not determined by genitalia, but instead by the individual's own choices. Michael Kimmel’s essay “Masculinity as Homophobia” claims that gender equality is a positive thing for males and that social norms force men to act a certain way. Kimmel’s main argument is that men are always having to protect their masculinity in order to prevent themselves from appearing weak. Both authors present compelling arguments for both gender equality and for how social norms influence individuals’ gender choice. However, the two authors approach the same topic in different ways. Kimmel takes a more laid-back approach to the topic by using simple words and a conversational tone that relates to the casual gender sociologist. Devor writes a more sophisticated essay using complex terms and a more formal tone that relates to the serious sociologist that research gender studies.
...ve begins generating rumors for male peers who do not qualify as a stereotypical male. For instance, Olive pretends to have sex with a male peer during a popular house party (Gluck, 2010). This imaginary hook-up benefits the male peer’s bullying dilemma. Again, gender policing occurs between men when masculinity is questioned (Kimmel, 2008). “One survey found that most Americans boys would be rather be punched in the face than called gay” (Kimmel, 2000, p.77). The gender police govern Olive’s and the male peer’s status in social standings. America’s obsession with sex disregards if a girl truly sleeps around.
“Boys will be boys, and girls will be girls”: few of our cultural mythologies seem as natural as this one. But in this exploration of the gender signals that traditionally tell what a “boy” or “girl” is supposed to look and act like, Aaron Devor shows how these signals are not “natural” at all but instead are cultural constructs. While the classic cues of masculinity—aggressive posture, self-confidence, a tough appearance—and the traditional signs of femininity—gentleness, passivity, strong nurturing instincts—are often considered “normal,” Devor explains that they are by no means biological or psychological necessities. Indeed, he suggests, they can be richly mixed and varied, or to paraphrase the old Kinks song “Lola,” “Boys can be girls and girls can be boys.” Devor is dean of social sciences at the University of Victoria and author of Gender Blending: Confronting the Limits of Duality (1989), from which this selection is excerpted, and FTM: Female-to-Male Transsexuals in Society (1997).
In this article, Shaw and Lee describe how the action of labels on being “feminine” or “masculine” affect society. Shaw and Lee describe how gender is, “the social organization of sexual difference” (124). In biology gender is what sex a person is and in culture gender is how a person should act and portray themselves. They mention how gender is what we were taught to do in our daily lives from a young age so that it can become natural(Shaw, Lee 126). They speak on the process of gender socialization that teaches us how to act and think in accordance to what sex a person is. Shaw and Lee state that many people identify themselves as being transgendered, which involves a person, “resisting the social construction of gender into two distinct, categories, masculinity and femininity and working to break down these constraining and polarized categories” ( 129). They write about how in mainstream America masculinity and femininity are described with the masculine trait being the more dominant of the two. They define how this contributes to putting a higher value of one gender over the other gender called gender ranking (Shaw, Lee 137). They also speak about how in order for femininity to be viewed that other systems of inequality also need to be looked at first(Shaw,Lee 139).
In the past, races were identified by the imposition of discrete boundaries upon continuous and often discordant biological variation. The concept of race is therefore a historical construct and not one that provides either valid classification or an explanatory process. Popular everyday awareness of race is transmitted from generation to generation through cultural learning. Attributing race to an individual or a population amounts to applying a social and cultural label that lacks scientific consensus and supporting data. While anthropologists continue to study how and why humans vary biologically, it is apparent that human populations differ from one another much less than do populations in other species because we use our cultural, rather than our physical differences to aid us in adapting to various environments.
Gender Outlaws (Smith, 2010) breaks the laws of gender by defying gender normative rules that exclude trans, queer and other non-conforming gender expressions often oppressed by “gender-norming rules,” rules, “expected to observe” or be subject to ridicule and often times labeled as freak by those who consider themselves as normal (p. 28). A gender outlaw seeks to, redefine the notion of gender and are carving out spaces of their own” (p. 30).
Gender, in society today, is clarified as either being male which embodies traits of masculinity or on the other hand being female embodying traits of femininity. However the embodiment of these traits are just actions, decisions, or expressions rather than sexual anatomical features we are born and constrained by. Gender depictions are less a consequence of our "essential sexual natures" than interactional portrayals of what we would like to convey about sexual natures, using conventionalized gestures. (West, Zimmerman p.130) This excerpt reinforces the idea that society should view gender not as a absolute but rather a work in progress during your day to day routine. This capability to accept that gender is something you do rather than something that is leads opens up the tolerance to realize the implications that traditional gender views have impacted
“History followed different courses for different peoples because of differences among peoples ' environments, not because of biological differences among peoples themselves” (Jared Diamond). In the book Guns Germs and Steel he accounted a conversation with Yali, a New Guinean politician that had asked “Why is it that you white people developed so much cargo and brought it to New Guinea, but we black people had little cargo of our own?”. Diamond tries to answer this by describing the difference in use of government throughout history by bands, tribes, chiefdoms, and states.
The idea of ‘race’ is a problematic concept in various academic fields. In the discipline of Anthropology, the definition of this term carries much controversy. The concept of race that many people hold is in a sense, a social construct that changes amongst different cultures, one could look at different cultures to see racial definition as a cultural phenomenon in action (Kottak, 2000:139). King supports this idea that races are not established by a set of natural forces, rather they are products of human perception, “Both what constitutes a race and how one recognises a racial difference are culturally determined” (1981:156). Cashmore provides a brief definition of race as “a group of persons connected by common origin” (1988:235).