Dualism In The Atomic Bomb

1573 Words4 Pages

At exactly fifteen minutes past eight in the morning, on August 6, 1945, Japanese time, the city had already awoken; kids walking to school, adults going to work, others eating breakfast going along with their normal daily lives on that exact moment when the atomic bomb flashed above Hiroshima. A tremendous flash of light occurred with such powerful force that it spread throughout the city like a sheet of sun, which caused the catastrophic flames from hell to immerse. Their flesh burned, incinerating 66,000 people instantly leaving others helpless and in undesirable pain. This monstrous act ordered by President Truman not only caused these innocent people instant physical pain, it exploit them to a lifetime of horrendous diseases like birth …show more content…

Oe states, “From that instant the atomic bomb exploded, it became the symbol of all human evil; it was savagely primitive demon and most modern curse,”(Oe 289). Critics argue his accusations seemed to be very harsh by his word choice since it was not a complete disaster and Hiroshima still survived, yet his strong accusations just strengthen his argument, when he uses pathos for his next and most important point of dualism. The world needs to be balanced between good and evil in order to survive and there must be enough good to overcome such evil. “To counter that absolute evil, it became necessary to have an absolute good in order to recover a human balance in the world and to preserve in reciting that evil,”said Oe (Oe 289). He had already introduced the evil, horrendous Atomic bomb causing many fatal deaths and diseases; now he mentions the good that helped overcome such evil. He describes how the actions of the people represents enough good to start rehabilitating Hiroshima. When Hiroshima was at its worst, its own people were trying to help out each other. It was more like "we are in this together" rather than, "survival of the fittest". These admirable humanitarian actions were astonishing, but what most caught …show more content…

He supports his theory by using conditional reasoning. He suggests, “Suppose that the atomic bomb had been dropped, say, on Leopoldville in the the Congo, instead of Hiroshima. Initially, a large number of people would have died instantly; then the wounded survivors , forced to accept total surrender, would have continued to die for many months to come,”. Leopoldville being such a small undeveloped city wouldn 't have the capacity to survive such monstrous attack and when the victors go and investigate the triumph they will express the worst nausea in their lives and the horrifying images will haunt them for eternity, causing many sleepless nights. He relates this scenario with the Nazi concentration camps on how bad the aftermath will be to enhance his theory. Another way he uses condition reasoning to support his thesis, is to use the story of Noah in the Bible and compare it to President Truman and the bomb. He confirms he knows very little of the Bible; nevertheless, he knows God will not send the deadly flood if he did not trust Noah enough for him to rebuild society. He suggests what if Noah was lazy and did not comply with God’s wishes, god will not be able to forgive himself for destroying everyone and everything; therefore, President Truman did not have faith in Hiroshima to survive he will not forgive himself nor sleep from the

Open Document