Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Drug testing for student athletes
Drug testing for student athletes
Drug testing for student athletes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Drug testing for student athletes
In 1986, the government created the Drug-Free Workplace Program. It allowed drug testing to be done anywhere and anytime by employers. Some companies have mandated drug testing, but not as many as there should be. According to the Department of Labor (DOL), employers drug test employees at many different times such as: pre-employment, post-accident, random, periodic, return-to-duty, or just because they are suspicious of misusing drugs. Employers have the right to drug test employees at any time, because of the Drug-Free Workplace Program. The DOL also states the many different reasons employers mandate drug testing; such as making the workplace a safe environment, push employees away from misusing drugs and alcohol, not allowing individuals …show more content…
In professional sports they mainly focus on treatment for the substance abuse rather than punishing the athlete. All professional sports test for different drugs. The National Football League only tests for the main illegal drugs at two different times of the year. Both of those times aren’t even during season. In my opinion, they need to be tested a few times during then season. If the players know that they aren’t going to be tested until February, they have nothing to worry about while playing in season. They could be using illegal drugs through all of football season without ever getting caught. Although the players can be legally tested at any time during the season, they most likely aren’t going to be tested unless suspected of drug …show more content…
Seventy-eight and a half percent of manufacturing companies test before hiring and forty-two percent test all employees. Manufacturing companies use heavy equipment and it would be very unsafe for someone under the influence to be operating a piece of heavy equipment. Wholesale and retail is the next type of companies that conduct the most drug tests. Sixty-three percent of wholesale and retail companies drug test employees before hiring and about thirty-nine percent test after hiring. I understand why that would be a bigger type of company to drug test. If I owned a store, I would not want people who are using drugs to be my salesmen. Many customers would not shop at my store if I had people who were using drugs or even looked like they were on drugs.
In 2012, four point one percent of the US General Workforce that was drug tested, tested positive. That is one reason for employers to drug test. There are no specific types of companies that are tested positive more than other companies, so every employer should be testing their employees. You never know when someone will be using drugs. The best thing to do would be to drug test all employees, so employers can weed out the
As much as 95% of employers favor urine testing as a method for drug testing, and this one piece of statistic may have positively affected the trend and demand for synthetic urine over the years.
The chapter, Selling in Minnesota, had some disturbing information about the low wage life. As I read, I learned that every place the author went to apply, such as a Wal-Mart and a Home Depot type place called Menards, required the applicant to pass a drug test. The author went out and had to buy detox for $30, but can be up to $60. Also, I learn that 81% of employers do drug test their future employees. I don’t like this statistic, in part because I tried getting a job at Marshall Field’s restaurant and they required me to pass a drug test. Luckily, another employer called me before my scheduled drug screening (which I had planned on passing by being really sneaky and using the urine of a friend of mine), so I took that job offer and everything worked out well. The reason I don’t agree with the drug testing required to access most entry-level jobs, is because the only drugs they actually test for is Marijuana. Cocaine and heroine leave the body within three days, and other drugs aren’t even tested for. So that leaves the most commonly used illicit drug, and one that has the least affect on the user, to be tested for.
...ult, and some times it does not give a result at all. It is unfair because it only targets certain workers; mainly low wage employees. It is unjust because people are automatically accused of using drugs, and that is why the drug test is given. Drug testing should not be abolished, but it should be a more controlled issue since it is something everyone in the US must go through.
The NFL has multiple reasons for maintaining a tough drug policy. Former NFL Commissioner Pete Rozelle stated that serious health problems occur for players who abuse drugs. Additionally, since the NFL is a billion dollar business, they have an interest in maximizing productivity from its players and alcohol abuse hinders that. It says in the Marquette Sport Law Journal, “The league has an interest in protecting the safety of all players” (Sisson and Trexell 11). Players who abuse alcohol or any drug for that matter put themselves and other players at risk. In 2012, Dallas Cowboy defensive tackle Josh Brent killed his teammate while driving under the influence of alcohol. He was released by the team three weeks after the incident and does not play in the NFL anymore. There are numerous incidents of players getting into trouble because of alcohol.
College football would essentially turn into the NFL in a way. Even though performance enhancing drugs are banned from the National Football League all players are juiced and talented as if they were taking steroids. For instance, in college football Alabama is a dominate team every year. Most players on their roster look as if they have all taken performance enhancing drugs at some point in their life. “Many players gained weight at remarkable rates compared with their fellow athletes and while accounting for their heights” (Disalvo). If every college football player could use performance enhancing drugs then every player would be superior which would lead to every team being evenly matched. Clearly, Performance enhancing drugs improve cardiovascular endurance and revamp muscle size (Lebeauf). Performance enhancing drugs are also used to assist athletes with pain conditions from overtraining or injuries sustained in play (Lebeauf). College athletics as a whole can affect many people. Because coaches as well as board members can lose their jobs depending on the success of their team, athletes are pushed to their limits to get the most out of training so they are prepared for play. In consequence, many injuries occur throughout a full sporting season. Some injuries are more severe than others, but nonetheless any injury will impact an athlete. Overall, the positives
It's nothing new for the National Football League's players to be abusing anabolic steroids and other performance enhancing drugs. Drug abuse in the league has recently focused around recreational drugs such as marijuana, cocaine, and alcohol. The newest drug being abused is painkillers. The commissioner and his personal need to change their policies. Will they wait until many more players start to die before they tighten up their drug policies? The National Football League (NFL) can stop most of these drug problems by having more random drug tests given, enforcing stricter punishments when players are caught using drugs, and requiring every team to educate its players annually on the effects and consequences of all drugs.
Drug testing is designed to detect and punish conduct that is usually engaged on-duty and off the employer's premises - that is, in private. Employers who conduct random drug tests on workers who are not suspected of using drugs are policing private behavior that has no impact on job performance. Someone may test positive after taking a drug days, weeks or months before. People are not generally required to organize their lives to maximize their productivity at work, and employers do not have a direct law enforcement function.... ...
Not drug testing student athletes will affect the relationships that the student athlete has with others. The team that the athlete is on will be one of the largest groups of relationships that will be affected. Being on a team is like a family and a family requires teamwork. Family and teamwork requires every member to work together and get along. Younger athletes on the team look up to the older members of the team or the captains. “Many of these younger students revere the senior football player or want to be like that star sophomore on the soccer field,” (More Schools Should Drug-test Athletes). If these athletes are setting the example by doing drugs and playing sports, then the younger players will most likely pursue in their role models footsteps. Likewise, taking drugs during the season is prohibited, so if someone on the team is using drugs they will probably not advise the coach or other team members. This will lead to lying to others. and then later hurting the team. Fights and distrust among team member...
In an effort to make drug testing for employees of the federal government more accurate, to deter false positives and false negatives it has been suggested to use alternative methods of testing. The Associated Press reported a movement by the federal government to "overhaul its employee drug testing program". (TAP, pg 1) Currently, the government tests its employees during the pre-employment selection and when accidents
Many people associate inappropriate drug use with loss of responsibility. The user does not show up on time for work, or if they do they may not be able to work to the best of their ability since they are under the
The ethics of drug testing has become an increased concern for many companies in the recent years. More companies are beginning to use it and more people are starting more to have problems with it. The tests are now more than ever seen as a way to stop the problems of drug abuse in the workplace. This brings up a very large question. Is drug testing an ethical way to decide employee drug use? It is also very hard to decide if the test is an invasion of employee privacy. “The ethical status of workplace drug testing can be expressed as a question of competing interests, between the employer’s right to use testing to reduce drug related harms and maximize profits, over against the employee’s right to privacy, particularly with regard to drug use which occurs outside the workplace.” (Cranford 2) The rights of the employee have to be considered. The Supreme Court case, Griswold vs. Connecticut outlines the idea that every person is entitled to a privacy zone. However this definition covers privacy and protection from government. To work productively especially when the work may be physical it is nearly impossible to keep one’s privacy. The relationship between employer and employee is based on a contract. The employee provides work for the employer and in return he is paid. If the employee cannot provide services because of problems such as drug abuse, then he is violating the contract. Employers have the right to know many things about their employees.
In all professional sports in the United States, the use of PEDs are prohibited. However, there is only one acceptation to that rule. If an athlete is injured, prescriptions to certain drugs which are used in recover are allowed. These drugs may consist of certain chemicals that enhance muscle grow. Some athletes have used this to their advantage and have got prescriptions to these drugs for their own personal benefits, will other athletes are using it for recreational purposes. This, however, is not the only way to obtain PEDs; there are also other ways such as buying them from an underground market. Athletes with the intention to cheat will take the risk of using PEDs, since if they are successful they will achieve fame and money.
When employees get hired, they get a drug test due to the fact that the drug testing can prove if the person they are hiring is a good person for their business. For an example “Approximately eighty-one percent of companies in the United States administer drug testing to their employees.” Drug testing also proves that people who passes it are clean and responsible people who the company can trust on doing their job well done and showing overall percentage of the US using drug testing (Chodorow). People who cheat on a drug test and gets a job will later ruin their job of getting into accidents during working and or start a fight with the boss or coworkers unknowingly just because they were high on drugs. That is why companies strive to do drug tests every time they hire an employee now due to the fact that they don’t want to be reliable for an employee who isn’t responsible and trustworthy of their time at their company. Which it will affect the company financially once employees gets hurt on their job. An employee who is not a drug abuser can really benefit a company by not causing trouble for themselves getting hurt in the company and also the business not being reliable for anything that is caused by the employee; who was not responsible. Another example is that reports confirm that 80% of those injured in “serious drug related accidents are innocent coworkers.” And after it began requiring accidents drug
Have you ever entered your school to see men in uniform processing drug tests to all students of your school, your friends, and even people you might know who do drugs? Have you ever thought about getting caught if you’ve had taken drugs or alcohol recently?
High school students are leaders to younger kids and many others in their community. As a leader these student must show others what good character is like, but instead they are destroying their lives by doing drugs. In the past decade the drug use among high school students is on the rise once again. With the internet, their exposure to drugs is much greater. High school students are convinced that they are able to get away with using drugs. These drug addicts soon influence other students into doing the drugs because there isn’t a rule preventing drug use. In order to protect these student’s future, drug tests must be enforced among all students ensuring a safe environment for students to learn successfully. Allowing random drug testing in high schools will shy away students from trying these harmful drugs. The stop of drug use among high school students is crucial because drugs prevents student from learning leading them to dropping out of high school. Students that become overwhelmed by these harmful drugs will ruin their lives forever, but if steered in the right direction they can be saved.