Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative impacts of drug testing at schools
Negative impacts of drug testing at schools
Mandatory drug test for students
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative impacts of drug testing at schools
Student Drug Testing
Many schools across the country have brought attention to the idea of drug testing students. The interest in student drug testing may be the result of the recent increase of drug use among high school students. Many teachers, parents and community’s members are for the drug testing, while most students and some parents feel that it would be a violation of students’ rights, trust, and view it as not effective. Although some benefits may come from drug testing students in public schools, those benefits do not outweigh the problems that result in mandating drug testing.
History of Drug Testing
In June 1995, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in support of random interscholastic student athlete drug testing( Franz). In 2002, the
…show more content…
Typically, it uses different drug testing kits to detect the presence of drug metabolites in the person’s body such as urine test, saliva test, and hair test. Many schools have turned to urine testing as their testing option because unlike hair and saliva it can be defendable in court. The certain drugs screened for may vary from school to school, but most often drugs like: amphetamines, valium, cocaine, marijuana, methadone, opiates, tobacco, and alcohol are screened for (“All you Need to Know About School Drug …show more content…
Drug testing is for early detection. Drug testing helps detect those who are abusing drugs find help quickly. School drug testing minimizes the possibility of students getting in trouble. Tiffany John the author of “Should students be drug tested?” says “students have a built-in reason to resist peer pressure, a well-known reason why kids experiment with drugs” (“Should students be drug tested?”). Students may use school drug testing as a reason to say no to drugs. Many people believe drug testing is an invasion of privacy, but the results of the test will always remain private. Many also believe the results are turned over to police which also is false. Results are not turned over to the law enforcement instead discussed with parents so as a family they can decide the type of drug treatment necessary. Drug abuse is a problem all over the United States. In “National Institute on Drug Abuse” it is stated that in 2013, there was an estimate of 24.6 million Americans aged 12 or older (9.4 percent of the population) has used an illicit drug in the past month (“National Institute on Drug Abuse”). Drug testing is to solve the drug abuse problem at such a young age. Ryan Lacey the author of “The K12 Testing Dilemma” focuses on a town that is struggling with an opiate abuse problem. In 2015 a Belpre, Ohio student lost their life due to a drug overdose. This would be the last straw for
The biggest question people ask is if the “war on drugs” was successful. According to the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP), “The goals of the program are to reduce illicit drug use, manufacturing and trafficking, drug-related crime and violence, and drug-related health consequences.” The best way to measure the effectiveness of the “war on drugs” is to focus on these basic questions; Is drug use down? Is crime down? and Are drugs less available? Since 1988, drug use by individuals ages 12 and over has remained stable according to the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA). The number of individuals reporting any drug use has increased by approximately 7 million and the number of those who reported drug use in previous months or previous years has remained unchanged. The Organization Monitoring the Future studies drug use, access to drugs, and perspectives towards drugs of junior and senior high school students nationwide. Results of a study conducted in 2005 showed a minor decline in substance abuse by older teens, but drug use among eighth graders stopped remained the same. However, the changes were not statistically significant and ultimately there was no reduction in substance abuse among young students. Crime in the United States has decreased significantly since 1993, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. On the other hand,
“Search and Seizure. Suspicionless Drug Testing. Seventh Circuit Upholds Drug Testing of Student Athletes in Public Schools. Schaill v. Tippecanoe County School Corp., 864 F.2d 1309 (7th Cir. 1988).” Harvard Law Review. 103 (Dec. 1989): 591-597.
In many high schools around the country, student athletes are using drugs. “The percent of students that have drunk alcohol is 72.5% while the number of students who have used marijuana is 36.8%” (Report: Nearly Half of High School Students Using Drugs, Alcohol). The students believe that since they are athletes that they do not need to abide by the rules because they feel more superior and that the narcotic will not hurt or affect them. Implementing random drug tests for athletes will create a positive image and not hurt others or themselves. Schools need to have drug tests for student athletes because drugs effect relationships, using drugs have consequences, and lastly they have a major effect on the body.
Mckinney, Joseph R. "The Effectiveness and Legality of Random Student Drug Testing Programs Revisited." RandomStudentDrugTesting.org. 2005. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.
The United States government projected $25 million to support schools in school-based drug testing and other drug-free programs. In 2003, many schools across the nation provided their own funding for student drug testing programs. The President wants to increase this program for 2005. He also wants to continue funding for ONDCP. This media campaign sends anti-drug messages to young adults via web sites, functions, and events on drug awareness. This approach will include information for parents and youth to encourage early intervention against drug use in 2005.
“A medical dictionary defines a drug as ‘any substance that when taken into the living organism may modify one or more of its functions’” (Newton 12). However, when speaking of drug testing for abuse a person is usually thinking about illegal drugs or drugs that can alter athletic performance in sporting events. Mandatory drug testing was not allowed in public schools until June 2002 when the Supreme Court allowed for public schools to do random drug testing (Carroll 23). This decision allowed for drug testing in all schools throughout the United States not just for athletes but also students who are in any activities within the school, for example clubs and competitive events (Carroll 23). Even though drug testing is now allowed by the Supreme Court many schools do not yet have mandatory drug test policies. Mandatory drug testing for high school athletes should be required because it decreases drug use in schools, is relatively inexpensive, and can prevent drug use and or abuse that can lead to a lifelong addiction.
In 1995, the Supreme Court ruled it was legal for teachers to randomly test students athletes. It would be worth the time and money so the school wouldn’t have to face worse drug related problems in the future. Since 2003, the U.S Department of Education’s Office of Safe and Drug-Free
Jacobs and Newton believe that one of the main groups that are singled out for drug testing is athletes. They also believe that singling out athletes and assuming that they are using drugs violates the constitutional right of their innocence until proven guilty (?Jacobs and Newton? 3). Mandatory drug tests for college athletes are a must have to enforce the rules of the game and to also not give athletes an unfair advantage. Lee and Griswold state in their article that there are rules in competitive sports that must be enforced, including a rule that bans muscle builders such as steroids (Lee and Griswold 2). Letting these college athletes compete with having broken these rules would not provide an equal competitive opportunity. Therefore, leaders in the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) should create a mandatory drug test for all college athletes because this test would help strengthen the rules of the games, ensure an equal competitive opportunity for college sports, and decrease the use of performance enhancing drugs and street drugs by college
Some parents say “kids will be kids”. But the truth of it is, all kids are guilty until proven innocent. The athletes prove their innocence by passing a drug test. Vernonia school district v acton, states student drug testing only in situations where the individual student is suspected, or where a particular group of students is suspected. I would say if the drug tests are random then you aren't profiling anyone or any group of people. If you're randomly drug testing athletes for their safety and their peers then you aren't suspecting anything, you're just doing what needs to be done for the team and the
Drug testing is essential to the public to prevent substance abuse. Since drug users tend to abuse drugs in any way they can get out of. The benefits of drug testing help society to be safe. Also drug testing can change the community to become more successful. Safety of workplaces often gives drug testing due to preventing violence and safety at workplaces for employees. Drug testing can be a hardship for drug users due to they sometimes need it for medicine, but some other people take advantage of drug usage that makes society unsafe. That’s why drug testing helps eliminate unacceptable substance that happens in the society.
I feel as if every athlete no matter the age or sport should have to be able to pass a drug test before being allowed to be put onto the team. Random drug testings during season could actually potentially help out with the problem also. If the athletes don’t ever know when they will be drug tested it could help keep them off drugs. A lot of high schools in today's society have put in the school's Code of Conduct that athletes are allowed to have random drug testing. Not only does this need to be happening in high school
The second reason why students should be drug tested so parents can be aware of their kids and ask their child/son why they are doing those types of drugs at school or outdoor. Once the child tells their parents why they do it then they might stop doing drugs due to a healthy behavior lifestyle
Have you ever entered your school to see men in uniform processing drug tests to all students of your school, your friends, and even people you might know who do drugs? Have you ever thought about getting caught if you’ve had taken drugs or alcohol recently?
High school students are leaders to younger kids and many others in their community. As a leader these student must show others what good character is like, but instead they are destroying their lives by doing drugs. In the past decade the drug use among high school students is on the rise once again. With the internet, their exposure to drugs is much greater. High school students are convinced that they are able to get away with using drugs. These drug addicts soon influence other students into doing the drugs because there isn’t a rule preventing drug use. In order to protect these student’s future, drug tests must be enforced among all students ensuring a safe environment for students to learn successfully. Allowing random drug testing in high schools will shy away students from trying these harmful drugs. The stop of drug use among high school students is crucial because drugs prevents student from learning leading them to dropping out of high school. Students that become overwhelmed by these harmful drugs will ruin their lives forever, but if steered in the right direction they can be saved.
(2) Some experts believe the schools’ anti-drug programs are effective. Two popular programs are Drug Abuse Resistance Education (Dare), and the School Program to Educate and Control Drug Abuse (SPECA). The project Dare and SPECA programs use uniformed police officers to inform students in 5th, 6th and 7th grade about the risks of drugs, and how to avoid negative peer pressure (DeJong 109). William DeJong ,who is an analyst for the Education Development Center, has prepared this study for the National Institute of Justice (Bernards 108).