Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on drugs in canada
Essays on drugs in canada
Social impacts of drug abuse
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on drugs in canada
Over the past 30 years, the use of illicit drugs has become a long-standing problem within the Canadian Society and requires urgency of more effective policies. Although it might seem that this issue has been tackled, however, the policies in place are ineffective causing the dramatic increase in the use of illegal drugs nationwide; as the National Institute on Drugs (NIDA) has confirmed that the prevalence of illicit drug use has increased since the 1970’s (Brownsberger & Heymann, 2009, p. 187). Busemeyer (2009) explains that in order to understand outcomes of the social policies and their relation to each other, it is required to include the over-time approach in examining the variables. This advocates a cause-and-effect relationship …show more content…
Further, in his platform, he offers a very similar strategy that President George Bush used in September 1989 in order to address the issue of drug overuse. Mr. Harper (2015) offers a national drug control strategy, which is jailing people for drug crime that includes drug overuse, drug trafficking, drug distribution, and drug possession. Promoting his views, Mr. Harper (2015) states that, “We as a government will not use tax payers’ money to fund drug use” (Blair, 2015, p. 1). In comparison, the Canadian Addiction of Mental Health association (2015) states that the Harper government is building a policy that is based on ideology rather than actual facts (Bryden, 2014, p. 1). For example, mandatory jailing and increased policing will cause the prison population to increase when the Canadian jails are already over-populated (Blair, 2015, p.1). This policy will end up creating more problems rather than solving problem, for instance, are the new jails going to be build reduce the over-crowdedness in prisons? Or are they going to be privately funded? Ironically, the very tax money that Harper (2015) does not want to use to fund drug users will be used towards the problems caused by initiating the penal policies against drug use. Hence, many social and health organizations do not support these conservative views on drug over use and demand …show more content…
In turn, media uses these concerns and creates a divide between the general population and the drug users. Media links the use of drugs with violent behavior, for instance, “Cannabis caused 14-year-old- to kill” (Mail Online, 2005, p. 1) or “Woman murdered was deliberately run down by suspected drug addicts” (Mail Online, 2014, p.1). The community then stigmatizes them into different labels, for example, junkies, potheads, scums, smack heads, and criminals. Thus, drug use in the media is illustrated as the key causal factor in violent behavior and crimes, as if experimenting with drugs turn people into murderers, rapists, or psychopaths. Hence, this causes the political actors like Mr. Harper (2015) to create punitive and zero-tolerance polices to tackle the issue of drug use; without realizing that the criminal behavior and the use of drugs has a weak
We live in a “recreational drug culture”, with the current criminalization of illicit drugs being driven by the common but not entirely universally accepted assumption that negative externalities will instead be placed in on society. Addressing the seemingly ever-infinite "war on drugs", in "Why We Should Decriminalize Drug Use", Douglas Husak argues in favour of the decriminalization of drugs in terms of not criminalizing the use of such recreational drugs. In this paper, I will dispute that Kusak 's argument succeeds because of the lack of justification for prohibition, and the counterproductiveness and how numerically evident the ineffectiveness of these contemporary punitive policies are.
“[The war on drugs] has created a multibillion-dollar black market, enriched organized crime groups and promoted the corruption of government officials throughout the world,” noted Eric Schlosser in his essay, “A People’s Democratic Platform”, which presents a case for decriminalizing controlled substances. Government policies regarding drugs are more focused towards illegalization rather than revitalization. Schlosser identifies a few of the crippling side effects of the current drug policy put in place by the Richard Nixon administration in the 1970s to prohibit drug use and the violence and destruction that ensue from it (Schlosser 3). Ironically, not only is drug use as prevalent as ever, drug-related crime has also become a staple of our society. In fact, the policy of the criminalization of drugs has fostered a steady increase in crime over the past several decades. This research will aim to critically analyze the impact of government statutes regarding drugs on the society as a whole.
Opioid overdose is currently the most common cause of accidental death in Canada and the U.S. The opioid crisis is having a devastating effect on communities across Canada, taking its toll on opioid users as well as their friends and families.
Bruce K. Alexander’s essay “reframing Canada’s drug problem is about how the focus needs to be shifting from intervention to prevention
It was the late 19th century when a lot of conflict for families from the Industrial Revolution and illegal drugs had easy access to anyone in the United Sates. These illegal drugs like morphine, cocaine, and alcohol were available through manufacture, delivery, and selling. It was proved that the over use of alcohol and violence in families’ homes were linked together around the 1850’s and that women and children were being abused by the father and husband from the letters and journals that were wrote. These were times when women were stay at home mothers and it was the man’s responsibility to be the provider for the wife and children. Because of the abuse in the household it led up to the temperance movement. The purpose
Drug use and abuse is as old as mankind itself. Human beings have always had a desire to eat or drink substances that make them feel relaxed, stimulated, or euphoric. Wine was used at least from the time of the early Egyptians; narcotics from 4000 B.C.; and medicinal use of marijuana has been dated to 2737 B.C. in China. But it was not until the nineteenth century that the active substances in drugs were extracted. There was a time in history when some of these newly discovered substances, such as morphine, laudanum, cocaine, were completely unregulated and prescribed freely by physicians for a wide variety of ailments.
The drugs issue is a major problem in Australia. A simple solution cannot be found to solve this great problem because there are so many decisions, thoughts and sacrifices that need to be made. All sides of the issue must be considered when making such a large decision. To find a solution, several tests, meetings, interviews and research need to be made, to name a few. Extreme care is needed when challenging such major issues, all aspects of the problem need to be considered.
An important application is how tipping points and trend lines apply to the present status and future course of the war on drugs. According to Webster’s dictionary, a war is the “organized effort by a government or other large organization to stop or defeat something that is viewed as dangerous or bad” (Merriam-Weber’s online dictionary, n.d.). Most people will unanimously agree that drugs and alcohol are bad and at least potentially dangerous, especially in the case substance abuse. Alcohol, drugs, and synthetic substances are associated with crime, violence, moral decay, brain damage, higher high school dropout rates, a multitude of health issues, and a myriad of other societal issues. As a society, Americans actually pay a high toll for substance abuse. The bill for tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug abuse costs Americans more than $600 billion annually in areas such as crime, unemployment, loss of productivity, and health care cost ( National Institute on Drug Abuse, n.d.). Based upon these facts, it ma...
Drug arrests occur too often and are taking up a majority of general arrests in America. “Drug arrests were the single largest category of arrests, accounting for more than 10% of all arrests in the country” (A drug, 2015). One out of ten of every arrest in the United States of America is a drug arrest. This over focus on drug arrests needs to stop as it is taking focus off of more damaging violent crimes. Overall drug arrests are up 8.3% from a decade ago” (A drug, 2015). Drug crimes are increasing because of the American government increased focus on drug crimes, despite the fact that it is not helping the problem. Even though drug arrests are going up, drug use in the United States of America is “... plentiful and widely used as ever” (Grenier,
“The root cause is a vast, multi-layered incommensurability between the institutions of globalized, market driven society and the basic psychological, social and spiritual needs of human beings” (229). Something that is only briefly recognised in public discussion. The normal methods of intervention are enormously expensive with minimal effects. “Illegal drug business and legal pharmaceutical industries” (229) are financially benefiting from the damaging drugs people use. During a time that is almost complete “domination of Canadian thought by the logic of globalization, it is difficult” (229) to even to come up with a good way of improving dislocation. Dodging these tough realities has created a deadlock and caused us to infinitely endure feeble interventions and ridiculous “war on drugs”
Past and Current Trends of Drug Abuse in the United States. Drug abuse has changed over the years due to the trends that Americans face from the encouragement of different cultures. The abuse of substances creates many health problems. The following will discuss the past and current trends in drug use and the effects these drugs have on the health of the individuals who abuse the drugs. The use of cocaine in the United States has declined over the last twenty years, while the use of crack has increased.
One of the most prevalent misconceptions, Benson and Rasmussen, contend is the notion that a large percentage of drug users commit nondrug crimes, what might be called the “drugs-cause-crime” assumption implicit in the government’s drug-war strategy. If true, then an effective crackdown on ...
Another great thing about this source is that it is well written and researched in such as way that it is easier to understand a very complex issue. I hope to use this source along with my other sources to demonstrate how this war on drugs began with corrupt motives and how this manipulation has continued to the present day. Additionally, I hope to show how we cannot erase this sordid taint from the system unless we disassemble it and reassemble it with just motives. Mallea, Paula. The War on Drugs : A Failed Experiment.
The other three themes developed according to the framed statistics. The use of drug-scare rhetoric was similarly consistent throughout; focusing on the harm narratives of a particular substance (Goode & Ben-Yahuda, 2009; Jenkins, 1999). During the upsurge-use period, however, drug-scare rhetoric became more aggressive and widespread as the state attempts to control the increasing arrest rates. The state undertook a more hard-line tone in their drug-scare rhetoric to control public perception on drug use (Goode & Ben-Yahuda, 2009; Young, 1971). Consequently, such amplifications generate a culture of fear and panic amongst the public (Cohen, 2002; Cohen & Young, 1973; Simon, 2007).
Drugs are part of the fabric of our culture and the drug epidemic has been a significant social adversary whose harmful effects and ramifications are daily news in our life. Considerable funds and human resources have been drained and exhausted trying to deal with this epidemic in a two-decades, governmental policy of " war on drugs “, yet there is no visible light at the end of the tunnel. What we see instead is a breeding ground for violence, gangs, and organized crime, not to mention the high rise of drug related offenses which overcrowds the court and prison systems and of which more than 80 percent are for possession of an illegal substance. And hence, a major debate on the legalization vs the criminalization of drugs has been at work in which the antiwar on drugs. Supporters presume we will be better off with a policy of legalizing drugs, and both sides of the argument have come up with theories and claims that range from the persuasive to the absurd and from the genuine to the mere propaganda.