There was a lot of driving forces when it came to imperialism in Africa there was a lot of driving forces when it comes to imperialism in Africa such as national pride and money.All of these driving forces had the biggest impact on imperialism in Africa for example technological advancement caused the europeans to find a vaccine for Malaria and that allowed them to venture further into Africa.
The white man’s burden was the one of the biggest driving forces out of them all because the Europeans believed that it was their job to establish imperialism in anywhere that was deemed uncivilized by the europeans in the poem “The white man’s burden” by Rudyard Kipling he says “ Your new-caught,sullen peoples ,/Half-devil and half-child.” He’s depicting
Throughout the 19th century, European Imperialism had a major effect on Africa. As countries expanded in terms of wealth, resources, and innovation, more territory and workers were needed. The first solution to solve these problems was to begin colonizing in Africa. The driving force for imperialism in Europe and Africa was mainly economical. This economical approach was established through many ways including cultural and nationalistic ideas.
One of the main reasons Europeans colonized Africa was for their useful resources. There are countless assets in the African landscape that were wanted by other nations. The European countries had access to some of the worlds most needed resources such as cotton, oils, coal, gold, and diamonds because they controlled Africa. This is shown on a chart of African colonies and their exports. ("Selected African Colonies and Their Exports" 269). This shows how the European countries carefully selected the land they did, to get certain resources they needed or wanted to use to benefit from. Another chart from a book by Trevor Lloyd, (Lloyd, The British Empire), displays the large jump of exports to Africa from 1854 to 1900. What that means is once Great Britain established complete control of South Saharan Africa, they began to export the resources they found that they could use. These charts are proof of how the European's wanted resources, and that is one of the main reasons for the imperialization of Africa. Not only did the European nations want the continent's resources, but they had an equal hunger for power.
The motivations behind U.S. imperialism were far different from the motivations of major European countries. Many European powers felt pressured to keep the balance of power among nations. The need to continue expanding was to make sure one country did not gain to much power over the others. The pressure to keep up with neighboring countries consumed European powers. The scramble for Africa changed Britain’s views on expanding when France started to colonize the country. Soon all major powers in Europe joined in the scramble to gain territory in Africa. The United
Prior to the 19th century, the Europeans traded mainly for African slaves. It turns out they were not immune towards certain diseases and therefore had an increasing risk of becoming sick. For years to come this continued, but not much land was conquered. Eventually, conference between only the Europeans was held to divide up the land appropriately, and the scramble for Africa began. The driving forces behind European imperialism in Africa were expanding empires, helping natives, and natural resources.
Europe, in the late 1800’s, was starting for a land grab in the African continent. Around 1878, most of Africa was unexplored, but by 1914, most of Africa, with the lucky exception of Liberia and Ethiopia, was carved up between European powers. There were countless motivations that spurred the European powers to carve Africa, like economical, political, and socio–cultural, and there were countless attitudes towards this expansion into Africa, some of approval and some of condemnation.
Throughout the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century, almost every country in Africa was imperialized by other countries in Europe. To imperialize is to conquer another country, whether it be in the means of politics, economics and/or culture, and control that land. The aftermath for the imperialized country was either beneficial or harmful. The amount of African countries that a European country imperialized varied. Great Britain imperialized fifteen countries in Africa, including Egypt in 1882, Sierra Leone in 1808, and the Union of South Africa in 1910. Although Great Britain’s reasons to imperialize were selfish, Britain helped each country progress afterwards.
In Africa, all the European powers except Austria and Russia had colonies there. Thus there were many clashes among France, Britain, Germany and Italy. Secondly, colonial rivalry led to indirectly to the formation and strengthening of alliances and ententes.
By definition, Imperialism is a policy or practice by which a country increases its power by gaining control over other areas of the world and its people. Imperialism began first in European countries such as Great Britain and Spain. By the beginning of the 1880s only a small part of Africa was under European rule, and that area was largely restricted to the coast and a short distance inland along major rivers such as the Niger and the Congo. Britain had Freetown in Sierra Leone, forts along the coast of The Gambia, a presence at Lagos, the Gold Coast protectorate, and a fairly major set of colonies in Southern Africa. Africa was first colonized as a way to find a trade route that was not in the control of the Ottoman Empire. Other European countries followed quickly in the steps of Great Britain and laid claim to areas of Africa, Asia, and America. Shooting an Elephant by George Orwell, The War Prayer by Mark Twain, and The White Man 's Burden by Rudyard Kipling are stories and poems that
Imperialism is the domination by one country of political, economic, or cultural life of another country or region and occurred during the 1800’s in Africa. Imperialism in Africa was caused by four factors in Europe: economy, politics/military, humanitarian/religion, and Social Darwinism (Ellis). The Industrial Revolution in Europe caused the need for oversea expansion because the manufacturers needed things like: rubber, petroleum, and palm oil all of which Africa had. Europe moving into Africa was also caused by nationalism, when France went into Africa so did Britain (Ellis). The difference between France and Britain was the way of rule they used. There are four different methods of imperialism: direct, indirect, protectorate, and sphere of influence. The most popular were direct and indirect. The French used direct, they sent officials and soldiers from France to administer their colonies and their purpose was to inflict French culture on their colonies and make them into French provinces (Ellis). The British, however, used indirect, they used chiefs to oversee their colonies and encouraged the children in the colonies to get education in Britain. The British “Westernized” their colonies and only used military force when threatened (Ellis).
During the late 19th century, Europeans used their superior technology to dominate Africa. This policy is known as Imperialism. Imperialism is when a country dominates other countries politically, socially, and economically. Although Imperialism helped the Europeans, it harmed the natives of Africa because their cultures were destroyed, their resources were exploited, and the Europeans enslaved them and as well as introduce them to new diseases. One way that Imperialism harmed the natives was that the native cultures of Africa were destroyed and replaced with European cultures.
From the 1950s through the early 1990s, nations across Africa broke through the barriers that colonial powers had placed to become nation-states: groups of people in a region who share both common cultural characteristics and self-determination. This was the result of many decades of work by nationalists and citizens to earn one freedom after another. The nation-states of Africa were rewards that were worth the lives and time spent by these brave people. In a way, the prize of independence for African nationalists is similar to the prize of a bouquet of roses, in that having self-determination and sovereignty over your own land is beautiful, no matter the troubles that poke from underneath. For some nation-states in Africa, these thorns of trouble have gone so far as to
The ram pant and complex nature of political instability and socioeconomic malaise being experience in most African states today have recourse to the nature and character of classes introduced in Africa by colonialism. The economic and other resources of Africa are shared between the petty bourgeoisie and their colonial counterparts, even in this contemporary time. The nature of political power struggle and distribution of wealth, as well as economic resources in the contemporary African state, are a reflection of the understanding and harmony of interest between the African petty bourgeoisie and their colonial partners or friends. The severe impoverishment of most Africans by their petty bourgeois rulers and marginalisation as well as oppression
In order to properly understand the effects of colonization, one must look at its history. Most of Africa was relatively isolated from Europe throughout early world history, but this changed during the 17th to the 20th centuries. Colonization efforts reached their peak between the 1870s and 1900 in the “Scramble for Africa” which left the continent resembling a jigsaw puzzle Various European powers managed to colonize Africa including Britain, France, Germany, Belgium, Portugal, and Spain. This intense imperialist aggression had three major causes. The primary reason was simply for economic gain. Africa is refuge to vast, unexplored natural resources. European powers saw their opportunity and took it. Another motive was to spread the Christian religion to the non-Christian natives. The last major incentive was to demonstrate power between competing European nations. African societies did try to resist the colonial takeover either through guerilla warfare or direct military engagement. Their efforts were in vain, however, as by the turn of the century, only Liberia and Ethiopia remained not colonized. European powers colonized Africa according to the guidelines established by the Berlin Act (1885). Many of the colonized nations were ruled indirectly through appointed governor...
Tunde Obadina, an African author, clearly states that there is no debate about the destruction that colonialism caused. The facts presented about this issue are irrefutable; the Belgian Congo, the British Protectorate of Uganda, and European imperialism in the Americas all perspicuously exemplify this idea. In each of these cases, the ethnocentric views of the European colonizers resulted in the mistreatment of the indigenous peoples, which further led to change in the political, economic, and social elements of these nations. Colonialism in Africa and the Americas--among other countries--was ultimately a negative part of each country’s past, present, and future.
There were many driving forces behind the scramble for Africa, European imperialism being one of them. The partition of Africa resulted in many changes to the continent of Africa. Economically, European countries colonized for trade purposes and natural resources. Culturally, they wanted to spread the beliefs of Christianity and portray a sense of national pride. Politically, they also wanted more land.