Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Biology and monogamy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Biology and monogamy
Dr. Tatiana is an educated sex expert of all species who uses this book to describe and explain how vastly different sex is from one organism to another. In this first section of the book, Dr. Tatiana focuses on how men and women want “different things from each other, and from life” (Judson 4). This section is concentrated on how in most species girls are wanton and strumpet. We assume that men go around philandering while women are chaste, well, Dr. Tatiana teaches us the opposite. Women amongst species sleep around because they desire the best male fit to pass on his finest genes to her offspring; they say that promiscuous females have more and healthier children. If their partner is good looking, healthy, skillful, etc., their child will …show more content…
Failure to keep up with their partner’s appetite when they are in heat will result in cheating. It seems outrageous that animals smaller than humans (i.e. birds) are capable of doing this when realistically it’s impossible for humans to have sex hundreds of times in a day with a sperm count that does not even come close to theirs. Essentially, due to promiscuity and the hostile environment female reproductive tracts provide for sperm, the males who can produce the most sperm have a greater chance at fertilizing a female’s eggs. However, sometimes more sperm is not the answer, bigger sperm is. In a few species, they produce lesser amounts of sperm but they are much larger and stronger than small sperm produced by the millions. Bigger sperm can make its way through the female reproductive tract quicker and technically “push” other smaller sperm away. To add on, female’s choose their partners based on looks (ugly and wimpy does not win) , skills, fighting techniques, quality characteristics, and what gifts they provide. Cheaper gifts risk the punishment of not copulating for long, and if the male can’t produce anything for the female they are rejected.
To conclude, the foremost important details of this section is that females amongst organisms are not as innocent as we assumed
…show more content…
This organism is recognized as Philodina roseola (known as Miss Philodina in the chapter), a half-millimeter long creature which has been reproducing asexually for 85 million years. In the book, this character stars on a parody version of Jerry Springer or Dr. Phil the TV show with Dr. Tatiana as the host and Miss Philodina as the guest. Miss Philodina’s capabilities have risen questions for scientists all over because they cannot agree on what sex is actually for since this creature doesn’t need it at all. Mammals can clone sometimes when an embryo splits during development, we call it “twins.” During this debate, some organisms were dictating that if organisms do not have sex to procreate then they will go extinct. Brilliantly Miss Philodina brings up how dinosaurs used to have “rampant sex” (224) and they still went extinct. Another organism from the audience brings up how asexuals will eventually die of genetic diseases because they cannot adapt to the environment or get rid of genetic diseases/mutations. She explains how some mutations have no effect and scientists only look at bad mutations. Dr. Tatiana disagrees stating that when a mutation has an effect, they usually do harm, not help. All in all, although there is no clear answer, all we know is that sex is needed to stay healthy. It is essential to our life so we can have gene
To begin, I think it is important to analyze the difference between “sex” and “gender”. Up until researching for this paper, I though that the two terms were interchangeable in meaning, rather, they are separate ideas that are connected. According to Mary K. Whelan, a Doctor of Anthropology focusing on gender studies, sex and gender are different. She states, “Western conflation of sex and gender can lead to the impression that biology, and not culture, is responsible for defining gender roles. This is clearly not the case.”. She continues with, “Gender, like kinship, does have a biological referent, but beyond a universal recognition of male and female "packages," different cultures have chosen to associate very different behaviors, interactions, and statuses with men and women. Gender categories are arbitrary constructions of culture, and consequently, gender-appropriate behaviors vary widely from culture to culture.” (23). Gender roles are completely defined by the culture each person lives in. While some may think that another culture is sexist, or dem...
In the book, “On the Meaning of Sex” J. Budziszewski talks about the meaning of sex. Budziszewski states that the issue of sex is one of the most important issues in our culture since the sexual revolution. Budziszewski opens the book by restating a conversation he once had with a student about the Book, “Brave New World.” The student states that the people are revolting and disgusting. Budziszewski is delighted by this statement. He believes that the student and himself are on the same page. Budziszewski responds to the student by agreeing and saying that there needs to be some meaning to sex. However; the student replies by saying, that the manner in which babies are “born” in the brave new world is disgusting and that sex doesn’t necessarily
Actually monogamy had developed long before religion became interested. According to Fisher’s estimate, nearly every human society has been monogamous to some degree (69), and she claims that human beings have a biologically natural preference for mo...
Governed under the principles of male supremacy and superiority, it is comprehensible as to why female sexuality has been coined a “dangerous mechanism”
...socially directed hormonal instructions which specify that females will want to have children and will therefore find themselves relatively helpless and dependent on males for support and protection. The schema claims that males are innately aggressive and competitive and therefore will dominate over females. The social hegemony of this ideology ensures that we are all raised to practice gender roles which will confirm this vision of the nature of the sexes. Fortunately, our training to gender roles is neither complete nor uniform. As a result, it is possible to point to multitudinous exceptions to, and variations on, these themes. Biological evidence is equivocal about the source of gender roles; psychological androgyny is a widely accepted concept. It seems most likely that gender roles are the result of systematic power imbalances based on gender discrimination.9
What is it that makes up our identities? I mean us, not only Americans but other cultures as well, the entire world. When tracing back my family tree I learned that I am of half-German descent with a quarter French and another quarter Irish in me. I also think it is safe to say that a majority of the population reading this is of European lineage. I don’t say this to discriminate, only to be specific in the telling of my story. The story I am about to recite is about humans and about one of our basic needs for survival. Some will argue, saying that sex is not at all a basic need but let’s face it, without sex you wouldn’t be reading this intriguing article right now, and the world would be less fulfilled without the human reproduction process.
The two books examined in this paper, Martin Daly and Margo Wilson's Homicide and David M. Buss's The Evolution of Desire, suggest that human mating strategies have an evolutionary basis. The book written by Martin Daly and Margo Wilson supplies the theoretical groundwork and the book written by David M. Buss gives validity and empirical support for the theory. The two books make a strong scientific argument for evolutionary adaptations as the most crucial element to understanding human sexuality and desire. According to this argument, the key to understanding human sexuality lies in the evolutionary origin of our species.
12). What is ok for one to do is not acceptable for another to do although they are equal. This standard is upheld by media on almost every outlet. This can range from women showing off their sexuality to the men being praised for sleeping around or having lots of women around him in one setting. An outside source goes on to state “Under the rubric of the sexual double standard, highly sexually active men are praised or rewarded with high status, whereas highly sexually active women are derogated or suffer a damaged reputation” (Marks, 2008, Pg. 84). In the society we live in a man can have a many sexual partners as he pleases and studies actually show that men do report having more sexual partners than women (Chapter 12). Not only is it glorified and encouraged but there are some countries that practice polygyny which is when a man has more than one wife making it acceptable in various cultures. There are instances where a woman has multiple husbands as well and this is referred to polyandry. A woman’s sexuality is always glorified and placed on a peddle stool in some cases. Men love to admire the female body like to cat call when they see something they like. However, if and when a woman acts in the sexual manner that men glorify them to be in, then the woman is looked at
"In dismantling the notion that sex and gender are innate, first the two must be defined. Sex is described as the interaction between genes, hormones, behavior, and the environment. The adjectives female, male, or intersex is used when referring to sex. Gender is the social status, legal
However, the postulation that sex is maintained in spite of its disadvantages because it engenders future adaptation in a variable world is arduous to forfend.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (1993, April) The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough Retrieved from http://moodle.csun.edu
Throughout time scientists, philosophers, and laymen alike have discussed questions of the complexity of sex. These questions range from what sex is, to what is a sexual perversion, and far beyond exploring every nook and cranny of the subject. One of the authors that is well know for this type of discussion for idea of how to explain sexual desire is Alan Goldman. During his writing of “Plain Sex”, Goldman tries to define what sexual desire is, what a sexual perversion is, and other claims relating to sexual desire, often shrugging off previously believed theories. His ideas lead away from the idea that sex has a means end and leads to a more primal basis that sex is a desire for physical contact and the need to fulfill this desire for physical contact. In the end I will argue that his definition leaves out our basic cognitive functions and defines humans as to primal form of being. This leads us into his central arguments for why he sees it logically necessary that sex is a need for physical contact and the pleasure that comes from it.
Despite the sound logic of the evolutionary argument, it does not account for what humans have had for a long time: contraception. This is why many people prefer to look at how this double standard formed from more of a sociological viewpoint. Women’s sexual con...
In addition to the sexes male and female, Fausto-Sterling proposes we add three more categories including herm, (a true hermaphrodite) which has both testes and ovaries, merm (a male pseudo-hermaphrodite), which has testes and no ovaries, although some aspects of female genitalia, and fem, (a female pseudo-hermaphrodite) which has ovaries and some aspects of male genitalia but no testes. The reason for the addition of these sexes is to be more accurate and inclusive for all persons. Fausto-Sterling’s arguments for having at least five sex categories are valid because only having two categories is biologically inaccurate, and exclusive to people who do not fit into either category perfectly, both contributing to societal
Martin, Emily. "The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles." Gender, Sex, and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University, 2009. 248-53. Print.