Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on the effects of sugar
Simple neurobiology of addiction
Essays on the effects of sugar
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on the effects of sugar
Many critics argue that a sugar tax is unfair because it falls under the same category as the “sin” taxes on alcohol and tobacco, implying that sugary beverages are as bad as a drug. However, there is truth behind these claims. For those that are not aware, dopamine is a natural drug that the brain produces to create a feeling of happiness and satisfaction. It is the drug involved in many natural processes such as sex, love, eating, and exercise. Dopamine is also involved in the “high” that cocaine induces by forcing the release of excess dopamine into the brain. Manufacturers have figured out how to turn soda and other products into designer drugs that can exploit this same reward system of dopamine. Junk food is engineered to enslave its customers, leading to an unhealthy diet filled with sugar, fats, and salt (Engber). …show more content…
Anything in excess is unhealthy for the body and in today’s society, there is a clear excess of the consumption of sugar which is leading to the many health complications obesity can bring.
Ranging from heart disease to diabetes the consequences of unhealthy eating are well known across the population, yet not much is being done to stop this. According to the World Health Organization, it is projected that by 2030, Diabetes will become the 7th leading cause of death in the world. Why let things spiral out of control and continue postponing a sugar tax? If there is anything that the US government can do is impose this tax. Even if the change is small in comparison to the entire population of the US, these are potential lives being saved. Just like the worst case scenario of smoking is lung cancer, the worst case scenario of obesity is diabetes. Excess sugar should be considered as big of a threat as any other potentially addictive chemical, and should therefore be taxed like one for the safety of the
people. There are many arguments for and against a sugar tax. Some argue it is unfair because it is regressive and would greatly affect the poor with minimal impact on the upper and middle classes. Others believe it is outright wrong as people have the right to eat and live any way they want. The truth is; however, that there are plenty of consequences if sugar is continually consumed the way it is now and its economic cost does not fall only on the obese, but also on the healthy who pay for the health care with their taxes. If everyone is going to be affected by the negative effects of obesity, then everyone should work together towards fixing the problem. A federal sugar tax may not be the complete solution to the obesity epidemic in the US, but it would sure be, the first step towards healthier, longer lives.
Professor of human evolutionary biology at Harvard, Daniel E. Lieberman, in his op-ed article, “Evolution’s Sweet Tooth,” published in the New York Times on June 6, 2012, addresses the topic of obesity in the United States and argues that human beings have evolved to crave and store sugar, yet in this day in age, sugar production, as well as consumption, has directly contributed to the unhealthy trend of obesity and obesity-related diseases, such as Type 2 diabetes and heart disease. He supports this claim first by responding to Michael R. Bloomberg’s “plan to ban the sale of giant servings of soft drinks in New York City” in order to explain that this will ultimately be a violation of human rights, second by teaching his readers the history
The article,“ Battle lines drawn over soda tax,” by Associated Press , the Press explains how there is an ongoing “national fight about taxing sugary drinks.” According to Associated Press, “ Health experts say the beverages contribute to health issues such as diabetes, obesity, and tooth decay.” This quote demonstrates that sugary drinks can lead to health issues. Since sugary drinks leads to health issues, people are considering soda tax. This is because thirteen percent of adult minorities are diagnosed with diseases such as diabetes.
In Michael Moss’ “The Extraordinary Science of Addictive Junk Food” he argues that companies have a huge influence on what consumers purchase and have been successfully able to get people addicted to junk foods because one’s willpower does not overpower their lack of adequate information and time, vulnerability to manipulative marketing and formulation of products, and their socioeconomic status.
Jon Gabriel explains how sugar has become an addictive drug like nicotine, the only difference is that its legal. Once we become hooked on it we become habituated to its effects and need more and more to satisfy ourselves. As a result of the increase in marketing and the on going dependence on sugary foods and beverages, children are taking in more and more sugar and obtaining less and less nutrients. According to Gentry Lasater,
Most people want to succeed but today nobody wants to put in the hard work hence Adderall sounds like the perfect solution except no one stops to think of the consequences or even bother to do some research on the drug they are placing in their body. Advertisements are used to manipulate the reader into thinking they need Adderall, or as if they have ADHD. This manipulation works because not many people challenge advertisers instead the consumer takes it for what it is. The consumer silences themselves by not challenging and researching the drug that is being ingested. If the claim being made by the advertisement fits their problem and it has a fix many will fall for the ruse. If a product does more good than bad and is supported by scientific
Through comprehension of the significant relationship between SSBs and obesity, the existence of an unhealthy food environment and the indirect association of SSBs with chronic and severe diseases, it is clear that a sugar tax would aide in not only decreasing obesity rates but also improving health. Many argue that sugar taxes will not decrease obesity because there are multiple causes of obesity. However, as physicians, in our many roles, we can help to build a multi-sectoral approach to help decrease rates and I believe sugar taxes would be a good stepping stone. As a future physician, I play an important role in my patients’ health, and need to make sure that in addition to the implementation of the sugar tax, I involve a multidisciplinary team, educate my patients, and also encourage physical activity. Overall, the sugar tax and its multiple benefits should be strongly considered by the Canadian government to help decrease obesity rates and improve the health of
During my childhood, many of my cousins have been diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder or ADHD. They have been restricted from many different foods with high amounts of sugar because they became “hyper”. Because of the lack of information about ADHD, children are diagnosed very late and they have not received the proper treatment needed. Today, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), have been helping spread information about various diseases including ADHD. The website provides types, diagnosis, symptoms, and treatment options for ADHD and many more diseases. While reading the web page, readers may find specific details about the authors’ writing and different tools they used to persuade the audience. The CDC spreads information and provides comfort to parents, and those suffering from ADHD by utilizing rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, and pathos effectively.
Sugary soft drinks should be taxed in order to change people’s habit of drinking these towards the goal of
It is sad. People from all races and backgrounds are obese. In a recent survey done at Henry Ford College, 43 percent of students were overweight. Whether it is because they do not follow a healthy diet or they inherited it from their parents. Being overweight is correlated with lacking exercise or physical activity and not watching what is on the plate. Obesity can cause many illnesses, including diabetes, which is very common. As the debate whether soda tax should take effect arises, critics say that the tax will help those with obesity-related illnesses. What about exercising and maintaining a healthy lifestyle? These two factors cannot be forgotten knowing they are the most important. Americans have consumed 12 percent of soda and become less active since 1970. A soda tax aims to stop consumers from buying soda to help those who are obese. This will not be effective. Therefore a soda tax will not be good public policy.
Everyday Americans die from the diseases they carry from obesity. Many Americans over eat because their social problems or because they are hereditary. Many plans have been discussed but finding the solution is the problem. Junk foods and unhealthy beverages have corrupted children’s minds all over the nation and putting a stop on it could lead to other benefits. Unhealthy foods and drinks should be taxed and healthy foods should be advertised more to help prevent American obesity.
But this is only the beginning of this systemic issue. Not only are today’s families far less active, but easy access to rich-tasting, cheap food can be addictive. The fast food industry knows this and uses this information to make foods that make the brain crave more. In his book Salt Sugar Fat, author Michael Moss discusses this in an interview with food scientist Steve Witherly. “He ticked off a dozen attributes of the Cheetos that make the brain say more.
For years doctors have been saying that refined sugars are empty calories and consist of absolutely no vitamins or minerals that people need to survive. Dentists warn that sugary foods encourage tooth decay. Many people avoid sweet food because it can lead to obesity, heart problems, diabetes and cancer. These negative responses by people’s bodies are actually warnings. Maybe people eat sugar for other reasons than the sweet taste. The human body's negative responses to sugar may be a similar purpose to the reason kids feel pain when they are playing too roughly. People’s consumption of sweet foods might also serve as a sign of defiance against their bodies’ health limitations. What many people do not realize is that their tasty treats can affect their mind and emotions.
If you’re looking to lose weight, or haven’t had much luck with weight loss in the past, the chance is high that you’ve at least heard of phentermine. With pharamacy websites now offering phentermine online rather than simply as a perscription, many more people are seeing this drug as possibly being right for them. This new weight-loss drug has been talked up, down, backwards and forwards by medical professionals and users alike. But does it work?
In America over 300,000 people are obese and that number continues to grow because the about of junk food that is being consumed. This cost the economy one hundred billion dollars. That more damage done than smoking or drinking. (Crowley, Michael 5) There are other health problems, such as heart diseases, chronic diseases, and type-two diabetes that occur because of junk food. Increasing the price of junk food, by adding tax, researchers hope that this will prod people to reject unhealthy foods. Taxes will also encourage a healthier lifestyle, even in low-income families (Franck, Caroline 2).
While some diseases are hereditary, most are preventable, But it’s hard to prevent a disease when companies such as Nestlé, Mondelez, and PepsiCo are increasing the levels of sugar, salt, fat, and flavor to products like soft drinks, candy, and cured meats. Food science research has shown that these types of products can stimulate neural circuits similar to those that are stimulated in cases of drug addiction. (Tempels, Verweij and Blok, 2017). In order for those companies to sell as many products as they can they prey on Americans and people around the world disregarding what their products may do to their health? Advertisements from these companies tempt people to give in and buy products they don’t need to eat. Promoting diabetes prevention or obesity prevention would be more successful if there weren’t so many temptations standing in the way of it