Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Themes in the scarlet ibis
Themes in the scarlet ibis
Themes in the scarlet ibis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In James Hurst’s short story, “the Scarlet Ibis”, the narrator is guilty of his brother, Doodle’s death. There are many pieces of evidence stacked against him. He never treated his brother right and obviously had something against him from the very start. Doodle had a lot of health problems. His weak heart made it difficult for him to do simple things like walking and standing up. His brother was absolutely mortified at the idea of the embarrassment he would endure if he was known as the kid with a brother who couldn’t walk.
`The first piece of evidence that can be held against the narrator is the fact that he made Doodle touch his own coffin. This has nothing to do with Doodle’s death but does show how the narrator looked at Doodle and shows how he thought he could treat him. When Doodle was a child, the whole family thought he was going to die because of his weak heart. Just crawling was putting too much stress on his heart. The family was so sure he was going to die that they even made him a coffin. But Doodle didn’t die at that point in time. The family hid the coffin away. The brother decided that he was going to threaten Doodle into touching it. SInce Doodle couldn’t walk, the brother took him up there and threatened to leave
…show more content…
him up there unless he touched the coffin. When he touched the coffin, something jumped out and scared Doodle so bad that he could have died right there from shock. This was an act of cruelty. The idea of your family thinking you were going to die must be terrifying enough. But the narrator was just throwing another reminder of it back in Doodle’s face. The other thing that the narrator did to Doodle was perhaps the most evil one. When Doodle and his brother were outside, it started to storm. The brother, having already taught Doodle to walk, decided to see if Doodle could run. The brother took off, leaving Doodle to try and catch up. But Doodle’s heart couldn’t take the pressure of him running. Doodle stopped running and went to find shelter. But it was too late. His heart finally gave in and he died under a bush. The brother circled back to find Doodle lying dead. What the brother did here could be used for both sides of this argument. The problem with what the narrator did was he left Doodle to run on his own. When he taught him to walk, he was always there to supervise him. But he left Doodle to run on his own. If the brother had been there with him, maybe he could have seen the early signs of heart failure and would have stopped before the situation could escalate. The brother fully understood Doodle’s heart problems and completely ignored them. There are two sides to this argument.
People could say that his brother taught him how to walk and move his body, therefore, he clearly loved Doodle and was innocent. And they are right. Doodle did get taught to move and be a more active human being by his brother. But his brother’s motives for doing it were different than a lot of people were thinking. His brother did not teach Doodle to move from the kindness of his heart. He taught him because he was embarrassed by him. He did not want to have a brother that couldn’t do something as simple as walking. He also considered him a burden. He was sick of pulling Doodle around in a wagon. The brother did feel pride for Doodle, but that does not change his motives for doing it the whole
time. The narrator’s mindset changes a lot throughout this story. He should not be considered guilty because of his hate. Although he did resent Doodle in a lot of ways. But he should be considered guilty because of his absolute foolishness. He knew everything about his brother’s health problems. He knew that his brother could die at any moment and that he needed to be cared for and looked after and protected. But he completely ignored all of it because he thought to himself, “I have come this far, maybe I can do more!”. His pride in what he taught his brother to do ruined everything that he had worked for. And in the end, Doodle had to suffer the consequences for his brother’s careless mistake.
Doodle and Simon have many similarities. They both have heart conditions and have to adjust to their lives but that is really the only similarity. In the movie Simon Birch by Mark Steve Johnson, the character Simon never has a completely normal life because of his disability. In the book “The Scarlet Ibis” by James Hurst, Doodle never came close to normal because of his heart condition. Doodle and Simon have similarities but are different in many ways.
Who is the dynamic character in “The Scarlet Ibis?” To answer this question, one must first know what a dynamic character is or means. A dynamic character is one who changes by the end of the story. In “The Scarlet Ibis” the narrator is the one who is the dynamic character. How? First of all, the reason why the narrator is dynamic is he feels atrocious of how he has treated Doodle, his brother. The second reason is the narrator comprehends he should have appreciated his brother more. The last reason is the narrator feels fallacious of what he has done to Doodle; which has possibly led to Doodle’s death.
He also exhibits kindness and love toward Doodle during parts of the story. For instance when Doodle’s brother tires of carrying Doodle in a go-cart, he decides to teach Doodle how to walk. Although Doodle fails numerous times, his brother keeps trying and and encourages him after a particularly disheartening fail when he says “Yes you can Doodle. All you gotta do is try. Now come on,” (Hurst 558). In this quote Doodle struggles to walk by himself. However, his determined brother stays with him the entire time and encourages Doodle to make sure he never gives up and can learn how to walk by himself. The evidence shows that Doodle’s brother does care for Doodle and that he is not always mean and cruel. The quote exemplifies Doodle’s brother’s ambivalent attitude toward his brother. The author is trying to show that Doodle’s brother grows fonder of Doodle with each passing day. Doodle’s brother’s growing love for Doodle becomes more evident as the story progresses. After Doodle learns to walk well, he and his brother, “roamed off together, resting often, we never turned back until our destination had been reached” (Hurst 559). This quote shows that Doodle’s brother grows fonder of Doodle and the two become inseparable. They go everywhere together and Doodle’s brother takes care of Doodle when they go on their journey. Hence, Doodle’s brother becomes a kind, loving brother who takes care of Doodle and tries to make Doodle have a happy life.
When Doodle was born, the narrator "...wanted more than anything else someone to race to Horsehead Landing, someone to box with, and someone to perch within the top fork of the great pine behind the barn..."(595). Upon discovering Doodle was not only crippled but also not "'all there'", the narrator selfishly decides to kill his little brother by suffocation. His plan was halted when he watched his brother grinned right at him. Though the narrator didn't kill Doodle, the narrator treated his little brother with cruelty to advance his own desires. Two instances are the reason Doodle walked and Doodle's training in his brother's program. Firstly, the reason that the narrator is determined to teach Doodle to walk was not solely out of kindness. "When Doodle was five years old, I was embarrassed at having a brother of that age who couldn't walk, so I set out to teach him"(597). The narrator is embarrassed that he has a brother that's physically unable to meet the narrator's expectations as what his brother should be. Yet, the narrator successfully taught Doodle how to walk, but in doing so, the narrator gained a false sense of infallibility that's equal only to his pride. The narrator thus created "...a terrific development program for him, unknown to mama and daddy, of course” (599). Several obstacles impeded the progress of the program, resulting in the brothers to double their efforts. The narrator made Doodle"...swim until he turned blue and row until he couldn't lift an oar. Wherever we went, I purposely walked fast, and although he kept up, his face turned red and his eyes became glazed. Once he could go no further, so he collapsed on the ground and began to cry"(601). Blinded by his desire to satisfy his pride, he became ignorant of the fact that as a sick child Doodle is unable to overexert himself, but the
In conclusion, Brother shows his self-interest in how he treats his younger brother. He treats his younger brother, Doodle, as something to ‘fix’ and he cannot accept his brother as he is. When Doodle finally learns to walk, Brother’s selfish need for a more ‘ideal’ little brother is not satisfied for long. Soon he demands a little brother who can run, jump, climb, swim, swing on vines, and row a boat. When he gives Doodle lessons for these activities, he does not do so for concern about Doodle wanting to be able to do them, but because he wants Doodle to be able to be a ‘normal’ brother.
Doodle's brother would only do this to have control on Doodle and Doodle's actions. This control, which Doodle's brother wanted, gave him enjoyment to boss around his brother, enjoyment to boss a crippled kid. And that Doodle walked only because his brother was ashamed of having a crippled brother. It was bad enough having an invalid b....
In order to represent that the narrator's pride caused him to act with ill manners towards Doddle, Hurst creates the internal conflict which portrays the narrator’s struggle to choose what is more important, his pride or his brother. As the narrator confessed his past to the reader, he described a memory about how Doodle walked and he announced to the family that the narrator was the one who taught him. The narrator thus responds with: “They did not know that I did it for myself; that pride, whose slave I was, spoke to me louder than all their voices; and that Doodle walked only because I was ashamed of having a crippled brother” (Hurst 419). It is important to note how the author compares the narrator to a “slave” of pride, the word slave connotes that the narrator is imprisoned by pride and creates the appearance that the force is inescapable. Throughout the story pride dictates the narrator, if
Brother’s goals started to get out of hand once he taught Doodle how to walk he wanted Doodle to learn how to do everything. In the story he says, “ I would teach him to run, to swim, to climb trees, and to fight… I set the deadline for these accomplishments less than a year away.”(Check if this is need or not) (167)(Textual support- 3) Brother didn’t think about Doodle when setting this goal, he didn’t about the strain and impact this would have on Doodle’s body and on Doodle’s mind. (change the wording of this
“They did not know that I did it for myself; that pride, whose slave I was, spoke to me louder than all their voices; and that Doodle walked only because I was ashamed of having a crippled brother.” (Hurst 50). This supports the claim that this is Brother’s fault, because if he were never ashamed of Doodle in the first place, he wouldn’t be given all of the extra stress running has brought his body. The narrator was very strict, and hard on Doodle because he wanted a brother that was “all there.” Brother would have been much nicer, and understanding if his decision to teach Doodle to do things like the other children was based on
Mom’s words and doctor’s advice did not become a way to obstruct the narrator and his pride. Paying no attention to Mom and the doctor’s warning, the narrator took his crippled brother out and trained him anyways regardless of Doodle’s physical restraints, because he is embarrassed. “When Doodle was five years old, I was embarrassed at having a brother of that age who couldn’t walk, so I set out to teach him (Hurst 204).” Even worse, the narrator knew it was his pride that made him to force Doodle into cruel training, “I did it for myself; that pride, whose slave I was, spoke to me louder than all their voices, and that Doodle walked only because I was ashamed of having a crippled brother (Hurst 206).” In addition, due to his embarrassment, the
One might think that when Doodle was five his brother teaching him to walk was a fair surprise. Doodle’s brother saw it this way, and I see it this way as well. The narrator was not trying to kill his brother by teaching him to walk, but this is what caused Doodle’s death. Doodle’s brother was well aware of Doodle’s preexisting heart condition. The doctor said that using his legs too much would cause him to overexert his heart, and in doodles death, walking was the main reason he died. While teaching Doodle to walk, Doodle’s brother was often careless. For example, when the narrator taught Doodle to walk, Doodle would often fall to the ground and land on his chest. The ground was swampy and covered in twigs and rocks as well. Doodle was using a part of his body that he had never used before. Although teaching someone to be independent is a kind act, in Doodle’s case, how he taught him was not the safest. Doodle’s brother was well aware of Doodle’s heart condition as I said earlier. Even though Doodle’s brother knew this information, and after the doctor said that physical exercise was not an approved option, Doodle’s brother still taught Doodle to walk. That is why I believe that Doodle’s brother is guilty of teaching Doodle to walk, when he should have never done
James Hurst is the author of the heart breaking short story entitled “The Scarlet Ibis”. “The Scarlet Ibis” is a short story about two brothers; one brother is healthy, while the other is physically handicapped. The short story is centered on the idea that the older, healthier brother’s selfishness and pride ultimately led to the death of his younger brother, Doodle. Numerous quotes throughout the story demonstrate Hurst’s use of symbolism and foreshadowing to portray and predict Doodle’s untimely and heartbreaking death.
“I began to weep, and the tear-blurred vision in red before me looked very familiar."Doodle!" I screamed above the pounding storm and threw my body to the earth above his. For a long long time, it seemed forever, I lay there crying, sheltering my fallen scarlet ibis from the heresy of the rain" (225). The narrator shows how he felt when he finds his brother Doodle lying dead. The author of The Scarlet Ibis uses emotions to illustrate the protagonist’s personality. On a farm in 1911 during World War I a handicapped child named William Armstrong is born and is not thought to survive. However, miraculously he does and his brother renames him to Doodle, and teaches him how to walk because he is embarrassed of having a handicapped brother. His parents see the ability. Walk as a huge improvement, but the brother pushes Doodle to his limits eventually killing him. In the short story The Scarlet Ibis, the author effectively uses elements of short stories to illustrate the protagonist. The author James Hurst of The Scarlet Ibis uses characterization, mood, and conflict to illustrate the protagonist. The first way that the author illustrates the protagonist is through characterization.
A boy (unnamed throughout the story) has a conflict within himself thanks to all the pride he gained after he succeeds in making Doodle (the crippled brother) walk. It was hard for him to accept Doodle being crippled after he succeeds in making his brother walk, so he gains a regrettable amount of pride. “They did not know that I did it for myself; that pride… Doodle walked only because I was ashamed of having a crippled brother.” Once they had set out to make Doodle seem like a normal kid, he begins to feel his own infallibility, eventually leading to a heartbreaking mistake. “It was too late to turn back, for we had both wandered too
Can hurting loved ones ever be acceptable? Many people would have mixed opinions to this question. In the short story, ”The Scarlet Ibis”, by James Hurst, the topic is people hurting loved ones. In the story, there is a boy who lives with a normal family, until a new child came and was not in the best condition. The main theme that supports the topic is the plot and conflict that will help answer the question.