Does Money Corrupt Elections And The Political Process?

564 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The effects of political corruption

Abdirahman Hassan
US Politics 1130
Debate Brief #3: Does Money corrupt elections and the political process?

Money makes the world go round, you’ve heard this saying before haven't you? In politics money is a big resource. Money does not always have the power to corrupt elections and the political process but money can have an impact on elections and campaigns. Without money campaigning would be a lot tougher. but not always does a candidate with more money win. Money in politics is coming from a lot of sources, money is coming in from tax payers, “small donations” PACs and passionate interest groups.
If the Political Action Committees main functions are to collect and raise enough money to influence campaigns, then that clearly states …show more content…

“There are two things that are important in politics, the first thing is money, and I can’t remember the second.”- Mark Hana. With that being said, Their is nothing more important than politics and nothing matters in politics other than money.
Almost every American citizen agrees that there's too much money going into politics and the ones that do not agree have money coming in and are benefiting from it. When money is being dealt, there are a lot of cards that go into politics, and if you do not play your cards right you can get burnt. Hanna Mark, the great Republican kingmaker of the 19th century talks about how back in her days in the 1970s, congress was a lot more strict on political money, therefore politics was handled ethically and credent. When congress became strict after the watergate scandal they placed stricter laws and regulations. Money corrupts politics in almost any given way. Money runs everything in the world today. “ Money is the root of all evil.”- This saying goes a long way, it does not literally mean money is evil. This saying is implying that money is what separates everyone in this world, the rich from the poor, our economic classes and things like if you live in a nice neighborhood or have an

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Kenneth Vogel's Big Money

    1391 Words  | 3 Pages

    Along with Obama, Vogel mentions Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid as critics of large donors, who then also were leading in super PAC fundraisers. Though Vogel mentions many people and events, he never goes into great detail about any of it. Even with the immense amount of information that is left to the reader to decipher and research, one must ask themselves this question, “what are the effects of big money on modern politics.”

    Read More

  • Examples Of Sacrifice In The Great Gatsby

    240 Words  | 1 Pages

    Money is sweeter than honey but can be destructive. It simplifies a man’s life while a lack of it confines him in the streets of poverty. It raises his social status while an absence of it leaves him unnoticed. It gives him a feeling of superiority and importance among others, while a shortage of it makes him worthless

    Read More

  • Soft Moneys Elimination From Governmental Campaigns

    1411 Words  | 3 Pages

    The current use of soft money in the US Governmental elections is phenomenal. The majority of candidates funding comes from soft money donations. Congress has attempted to close these funding loop holes; however they have had little success. Soft money violates standards set by congress by utilizing the loop hole found in the Federal Election Commission’s laws of Federal Campaigns. This practice of campaign funding should be eliminated from all governmental elections.

    Read More

  • The Privileged Position of Business

    548 Words  | 2 Pages

    in lobbying policy makers, the role of business in financing elections, and messages favorable to

    Read More

  • Major Influences on Congress Members

    853 Words  | 2 Pages

    Power is the main influence on Congress members. Without power there would not be a need of money, people wanting the best career for reasons other than to be successful, and Republican and Democratic parties who dominate all parties who have other views. Power is great or marked ability to do or act, strength, might, force. A certain member or party who has a lot of force in Congress can persuade other Congress men or women to vote for what they are told. The people who are tricked into schemes tend to be young members or those seeking approval and power themselves. These plans and wishes for control can cause loss of confidence and criticism of government, not only Congress. If members are found guilty of pressuring, paying money, among other things they can be brought to trial. In the end, this costs the country money to hold a trial that will most likely go to supreme court who have enough trials to take care of. Not all Congress members play mind games and vote for what they believe is best for the public good. The hard part is voting for who you believe is the best fit to make those decisions.

    Read More

  • 1919 World Series

    1192 Words  | 3 Pages

    It seems that money is the root of all evil and can make a man do things that he would

    Read More

  • How Is Money Corrupt In The Great Gatsby

    773 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Money so they say is the root of all evil today.” - Pink Floyd, “Money”

    Read More

  • The American Oligarchy and the Pretense of Democracy

    674 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, seldom is this the case with American politics. There are far fewer politicians then there are low class workers or unemployed, and yet these politicians decide upon most all of the important decisions the country is faced with. The only time the rest of the people are involved is when these politicians spew out money and promises in an attempt to gain the p...

    Read More

  • Campaign Finance Reform

    2679 Words  | 6 Pages

    ... outweigh this potential (but not proven) appearance of corruption. The real potential for corruption is related to direct contributions. However, the Court has imposed checks on this aspect of elections. It seems that any proposed system, even the current one, could be targeted as allowing for corruption, or for a disproportionate influence, or for a limitation on free speech. The important thing, therefore, is that the courts balance all these potential harms for the sake of protecting the democratic process and the First Amendment. The current system places checks in the areas where corruption is the most likely, and allows for the most expression in the areas where corruption is minimal at best. This gives citizens the great ability to influence elections and critically discuss candidates, while ensuring that politicians are accountable for their actions.

    Read More

  • Should Campaign Funding be Limited?

    1249 Words  | 3 Pages

    The issue of campaign financing has been discussed for a long time. Running for office especially a higher office is not a cheap event. Candidates must spend much for hiring staff, renting office space, buying ads etc. Where does the money come from? It cannot officially come from corporations or national banks because that has been forbidden since 1907 by Congress. So if the candidate is not extremely rich himself the funding must come from donations from individuals, party committees, and PACs. PACs are political action committees, which raise funds from different sources and can be set up by corporations, labor unions or other organizations. In 1974, the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) requires full disclosure of any federal campaign contributions and expenditures and limits contributions to all federal candidates and political committees influencing federal elections. In 1976 the case Buckley v. Valeo upheld the contribution limits as a measure against bribery. But the Court did not rule against limits on independent expenditures, support which is not coordinated with the candidate. In the newest development, the McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission ruling from April 2014 the supreme court struck down the aggregate limits on the amount an individual may contribute during a two-year period to all federal candidates, parties and political action committees combined. Striking down the restrictions on campaign funding creates a shift in influence and power in politics and therefore endangers democracy. Unlimited campaign funding increases the influence of few rich people on election and politics. On the other side it diminishes the influence of the majority, ordinary (poor) people, the people.

    Read More

  • Ballade Of Wordly Wealth Analysis

    539 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Money moves the merchants all, While the tides shall ebb and flow, Money maketh evil show, Like the good and the truth like lies” (Lang 49).” The specified quotation clarifies that money supports the world to rotate but, also, it produces voracity and convinces the society that money is a great thing, when it is not. Lang creates stanza one by exemplifying money as something that can substantially convince a town, taking control of it. He writes that “money taketh town and wall” (1), denoting that money conquers a town and eventually seizes power. It can manage this by veiling itself as “Good” and “Truth”

    Read More

  • Interest Groups and Political Parties

    1676 Words  | 4 Pages

    The advocacy explosion is strongly linked to the decline of the American political party and the role of the political parties in elections. As interest groups have gained more power and had a larger control over politics and political goods the power that is exerted by political parties has dwindled. The power of the interest group has grown larger with the amount of members and the financial rewards that have come with the new members. In elections interest groups do not usually participate directly with the candidate or the election. Berry points out that “Groups often try to leverage their endorsement to obtain support for one of their priorities” (Berry, 53). With interest groups spreading their resources around the actual election can be affected very minimally by the many interest groups that contribute money to the election. However, the candidates who obtain political office through the help of special interest money still owe some sort of loyalty to the interest group regardless of which party wins the election. This loyalty and the promise of more money in the future gives the elected of...

    Read More

  • My American Dream

    838 Words  | 2 Pages

    When we refer to the "American politics", we are referring to the wealthy, upper class members participating in taking office in our government, and through political power, push and control rules and regulations to make them wealthier. By doing so, they cause a big income inequality in our society between the upper and lower classes. The American politics cause this dilemma through what they call organized combat. Through organized combat, they put blame on income inequality of our society due to economic change, globalization, and creating the environment where the educated is at much greater advantage then the uneducated. These individuals use their wealth and fame to run for political offices in our government. Then work together with other individuals, with similar purpose in mind, to create to bills and regulations to future benefit and protect their wealth and business ventures. An example would be the idea of tax reduction on our society. In general aspect, the idea of tax cuts seems to benefit us all as a society, but the upper class exponentially benefit from these reforms at a much higher degree. Other examples of these reforms helping the wealthy are the government buy outs for big businesses that seem to be in trouble. The funding that go to these so called "buyouts" to relief the

    Read More

  • The Pearl, by John Steinbeck

    885 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...the root of all evil, and that the true root of all evil is actually greed. The reason this could be considered true is because money is essentially an object that created by people. It is not the money that can be seen as evil, it is the greed people possess to obtain money. Even if money did not exist greed would still be around, it just would not be powered by money. But in this particular setting the evil is in fact money. Furthermore, Steinbeck displays how the love money can be good in some cases but it also has a downside to it. Money creates a sense of jealousy, immoral, and in extreme terms just plain evil. Kino's discovery of the pearl could have brought him an unending amount of wealth and happiness but instead, it led to the death of his son and enabled him to kill a man unjustly.

    Read More

  • Money Is The Key To Success

    1394 Words  | 3 Pages

    Money exists no place else but in our minds. Money is not gold or silver; it is not a bill, and not a credit card. Love of money is recognized evil it always has been and it always will. People want money for various reasons, for security, status; to be powerful and etc. “This is also known as materialism, which brings in its wake tension and unhappiness.” Evil arises when people are controlled by money and compare everything in terms of money. Desire to earn money is not the root of all evil; everybody needs money to fulfill their needs. The problem appears when our wants increase. Therefore, the want of money increases, and we start to have a desire of wanting more of it and are never satisfied. Desires should not be confused to be the root cause of

    Read More

More about Does Money Corrupt Elections And The Political Process?

Open Document