Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Use of irony in Shakespeare tragedy
Use of irony in Shakespeare tragedy
Use of irony in Shakespeare tragedy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Irony is a literary technique used by many authors throughout the American Literature, as it allows the author to develop a meaning in his story without blatantly stating them. In Order to attract the reader and make him thinking about the meanings behind the words and conceive the conclusions. Also many authors utilize the Irony to create humor such as F.Scott Fitzgerald who used a great deal of dramatic irony in his short story ‘The Camel’s back’ to show how one’s actions frequently overthrow their attempts to find love.
First of all, in the Camel’s back Fitzgerald try to describe a contradictory relationship between a characters’s limited understanding of his situation in some particular moment of the development action, so as to depict two sets of character’s journeys to look for love. Furthermore, in each story the female character has created an obstacle in her search for love. And by using irony, Fitzgerald depicts the ways in which each woman has inhibited her
…show more content…
opportunities. We can take the example of Betty in “The Camel’s Back,” Betty “would marry him and she wouldn’t marry him. She was having such a good time that she hated to take such a definite step” (195). Moreover, In “The Camel’s Back” Fitzgerald mainly uses dramatic irony to allow the reader know that Perry is disguised by wearing the camel suit while Betty didn’t realize that the man she refused to marry in order to retain her freedom is hiding behind the mask. She makes comments such as, “say you like me, camel. Say you think I’m beautiful. Say you’d like to belong to a pretty snake-charmer” (211) and “Aren’t you glad we’re going to be married and you’re going to belong to the nice snake-charmer ever afterward?” (214) while she is unaware that she is speaking to Perry. Therefore, through this dramatic irony, Fitzgerald shows that although Betty desire of staying free, she is able to spend a good time with her beloved. In addition to that, Fitzgerald accentuated the fact that when one attempts to control his own destiny the attempts are often futile and he or often creates more problems and inhibits his or her chances of finding true love. Added to that, the dramatic irony in “The Camel’s Back” holds the reader’s attention up until the end of the story.
The readers know that Perry is wearing a camel suit, and they know that it is eminent that Betty will discover. Actually, Fitzgerald keeps the reader try to guess until the very end when Betty learned that she has been married to Perry. Fitzgerald then summed up the story with a type of situation irony. Betty begins to cry hard and says she will cancel the marriage and that he will abandon her with the man that was in the back of the camel suit since she does not want to marry him. After saying her good bye, and while leaving for the west it sounds that Betty and Perry’s opportunities for love have certainly been shot when Betty runs to Perry and cries “Oh, Perry, don’t leave me! Perry, Perry, take me with you!” (220). Thus, this is also ironic because Betty has left Perry many times, but when she is the one being left she unexpectedly realizes what she really
wants. As well as, without the use of Irony in Fitzgerald’s story ‘the Camel’s Back’, the outcome and events of the story would greatly change. Also the reader views would be altered. For example, without the dramatic irony of the character knowing Perry was in the camel costume while Betty did not then the whole story would have exhausted differently. In fact, if Betty knew her ex lover was behind the mask then she would not have spent her whole night with him because she had just broken up with him to have her joy and freedom. Otherwise, with Fitzgerald’s use of dramatic irony she ended up declaring her love for the man she tried to abandon. To conclude, Fitzgerald strategically used irony in many influential ways throughout his short story “The Camel’s Back” by favorably capturing the attention of the reader, creating humorous moments, and supporting the moral he indicates. So Fitzgerald turned a simple short story into a multi faceted literary work by chiefly using dramatic irony, thus was able to show how one’s actions can greatly influence their search for true love.
Irony make things appear to be what it is not. Flannery O’Connor and Zora Neale Hurston are two ironic authors in literature. O’Connor was a devout Roman Catholic, with a southern upbringing (Whitt); whereas “Hurston is a disciple of the greatest dead white European male, authors, a connoisseur of macho braggadocio, and a shamelessly conservative Republican who scorned victimism and leftist conformism (Sailer). Both O’Connor and Hurston use irony in their short stories; however, they use it in significantly similar ways.
Like salt and pepper to beef, irony adds “flavor” to some of the greatest works of literature. No matter if readers look at old pieces of work like Romeo and Juliet or more modern novels like To Kill a Mockingbird, irony’s presence serve as the soul fuel that pushes stories forward. By definition, irony occurs when writers of books, plays, or movies destine for one event or choice to occur when the audiences expects the opposite; like Tom Robinson being found guilty after all evidences point other ways in To Kill a Mockingbird. These unique plot twists add mystery and enjoyability to hundreds of books. From the very beginning of The Chosen, a novel written by Chaim Potok, to the very end, irony’s presences does not leave the reader at any
“The supreme irony of life is that hardly anyone gets out of it alive.” -Robert A. Heinlein. In the short story, “The Possibility of Evil”, the author Shirley Jackson uses irony to develop the traits of the protagonist, Miss Strangeworth, in her small hometown. Throughout the story, there are many examples of irony as Miss Strangeworth goes through her normal day. Irony is an engaging literary device used by authors to expose underlying intentions which become critical to the development of the plot.
In the third sentence, note the metaphor and explain Fitzgerald’s choice of this particular metaphor.
1. Irony is a useful device for giving stories many unexpected twists and turns. In Kate Chopin's "The Story of an Hour," irony is used very effectively in her story. Situational irony is used to show the reader what is assumed to happen sometimes doesn't. Dramatic irony is used to hint to the reader something is happening to the characters in the story that they do not know about. Irony is used throughout Chopin's "The Story of an Hour" through the use of situational irony and the use of dramatic irony.
In the stories “Story of an Hour”, “Everyday Use”, “The Necklace”, and “The Lottery” it is evident that irony was quite a large part of the short story. There is situational irony, which is when the situation turns out differently than expected. Also, dramatic irony is present, which is when you as a reader knows more than the character. The authors seem to base their whole story around irony to surprise their readers.
Reading is an experience of art; without readers’ interaction, the meaning of any literary work is insufficient. “[Norman] Holland believes that we react to literary texts with the same psychological responses we bring to our daily life....That is, in various ways we unconsciously recreate in the text the world that exists in our mind.” (Tyson, 182) By telling a story that centers on the conflicts between two wealth young females whose personalities are distinctly different in the jazz age, Fitzgerald leads us on a journey of physical, and especially psychological transition of the protagonists through an omniscient narration. For female individuals, a tale emphasis on the youth,
Fitzgerald’s “This Side of Paradise” follows less the thread of a story, rather it provides a sketch portrait of Amory and his quest to understand the world. The story is told by a knowledgeable third person narrator who follows and adds to Amory’s point of view, interjecting his own thoughts in the narrative from time to time. Amory is the center of the narrative, much like the American youth is the center of their own. It’s a purely American approach to life – that is, you are the star of it, the rest are just secondary minor characters to your main story. The portraits of the other character in the novel a...
Fitzgerald's book at first overwhelms the reader with poetic descriptions of human feelings, of landscapes, buildings and colors. Everything seems to have a symbolic meaning, but it seems to be so strong that no one really tries to look what's happening behind those beautiful words. If you dig deeper you will discover that hidden beneath those near-lyrics are blatancies, at best.
Irony is the use of words to convey a meaning that is the opposite of its literal meaning. This rhetorical device is often used many times in literature and a very significant device. One example of irony occurs at the end. In the final chapter, was setting the jungle into fire, in order to smoke Ralph out. The fire, at the beginning of the book, was used for two things: it enabled the kids from signal a ship for a rescue, it helped cook meat, and it helped them keep warm.
Many authors use irony as a way of questioning the reader or emphasizing a central idea. A literary device, such as irony, can only be made simple with the help of examples. Irony can help a reader to better understand certain parts of a novel. F. Scott Fitzgerald helps the reader to recognize and understand his use of irony by giving key examples throughout The Great Gatsby. Fitzgerald uses Gatsby’s lush parties, Myrtle’s death, Gatsby’s death, and the title of the novel to demonstrate how irony plays a key role in the development of the plot.
Irony is a useful device for giving stories many unexpected twists and turns. In Kate Chopin's "The Story of an Hour," irony is used as an effective literary device. Situational irony is used to show the reader that what is expected to happen sometimes doesn't. Dramatic irony is used to clue the reader in on something that is happening that the characters in the story do not know about. Irony is used throughout Chopin's "The Story of an Hour" through the use of situational irony and the use of dramatic irony.
The definition of irony, according to Laurence Perrine, involves discrepancy or incongruity while it has a “contrast in which one term of the contrast in some way morks the other term” (177). He also includes three types of ironies; however, there are two more important ironies: dramatic irony and irony of situation. Dramatic irony is the contrast between “what a character says and what the reader knows to be true” (178). And irony of situation is “the discrepancy is between appearance and reality, or between expectation and fulfillment…” (178). The theme that fits with those ironies is the reversal of stereotypes. Reversal of stereotypes, defined by Shirley Barlow, is when someone “simply refuses any longer to accept... stereotypes unless
Irony is the uses of word to express something different from and often opposite to their literary meaning. Irony is used across literary genres to a variety of effects. There are three main types of irony that were often used by many authors. First is verbal irony or the irony that happens when conversational expectation is undermined. Second is dramatic irony or the irony that occurs when audiences know something that the character doesn’t know and the last is situational irony or the irony that happens when a text’s plot takes a completely different turn than both the characters and the audience expect. In “The Cask of Amontillado” by Edgar Allen Poe, the story took place in the catacombs. This story concentrated on two characters which was Montresor and Fortunato. Montresor wanted to take a revenge on Fortunato because he was mocking him; therefore, Montresor planed everything out and convinced Fortunato by
ABSTRACT: In contemporary literary culture there is a widespread belief that ironies and paradoxes are closely akin. This is due to the importance that is given to the use of language in contemporary estimations of literature. Ironies and paradoxes seem to embody the sorts of a linguistic rebellion, innovation, deviation, and play, that have throughout this century become the dominant criteria of literary value. The association of irony with paradox, and of both with literature, is often ascribed to the New Criticism, and more specifically to Cleanth Brooks. Brooks, however, used the two terms in a manner that was unconventional, even eccentric, and that differed significantly from their use in figurative theory. I therefore examine irony and paradox as verbal figures, noting their characteristic features and criteria, and, in particular, how they differ from one another (for instance, a paradox means exactly what it says whereas an irony does not). I argue that irony and paradox — as understood by Brooks — have important affinities with irony and paradox as figures, but that they must be regarded as quite distinct, both in figurative theory and in Brooks’ extended sense.