Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disney effect on society
Disney culture impact on society
Effects of popular culture on youths
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Disney effect on society
Disney Channel once consisted of amusing and truthful television that would teach children valuable lessons about growing up, such as the social and academic hardships they are bound to face and the peer pressures they are bound to encounter. It also simply helped kids see how to be decent human beings. Some of the shows were "That's SO Raven"," Sister, Sister", “Lizzie McGuire", “Hannah Montana", and more. Unfortunately, they were all taken off air. The problem is not that they have been taken off air; it is what they have been replaced with. The excellent shows of the 1990’s and 2000 have vanished. The shows that replaced the classic shows are, “A.N.T Farm”, “Dog with a Blog”, “Liv and Maddie”, and “Jessie” the type of shows that lack originality, substance, and humor. Disney Channel used to air episodes where the children would partake in wicked activities. Despite their best efforts, they were caught, consequently learning …show more content…
a valuable lesson such as the dangers of being a follower.
I remember from both Cory in "That's SO Raven" and Roger in "Sister, Sister", dangers of stealing. Disney Channel showed kids how to rise above what is considered "cool" and how to overcome the severe stresses of popularity at what is already an extremely stressful age. Disney used to show kids how they could be ‘cool’ without being popular, and to be themselves, attend school, and make friends that have the same characteristics.
Based on my analytic research on Disney Channel shows I discovered that Disney Channel uses the same plot, except the kids consistently get away with awful behaviors and never get caught, never learning the consequences of their actions. In addition, Disney Channel now tries to teach kids not to overcome the desire for popularity, but instead, how to actually gain popularity and be "cool" in mindless, common forms. Therefore, many children are no longer able to
establish for themselves the difference between sassy and humorous and just plain rude and disrespectful, all in their attempts to be like the characters they see on television. For an example, I have always wanted to be like Raven in "That's so Raven". It was worth watching because it was plenty of educational messages that came out of every show, and it was about a teenage girl that goes to high school with her teenage friends just like any other teenager. As a teenager, it was always amusing to see other teenagers your age on television. I was able to relate to them. Also, if you wanted to learn a subject you could learn from that show. For example, one day the show discussed the human body and its functions. I would not have expected to see the human body being discussed on a teenage, entertaining show that I loved. I did not know much about the human body and I was able to learn from 'That's SO Raven". On the other hand, everything was not always educational in the show. There were times where Raven and her brother Cory got into trouble and they learned a valuable lesson in the end. Cory gets sucked into a world of peer pressure after his friends lead him into stealing from a local mall. But when Raven has a vision of catching him doing it again, she must dress up as a security guard to stop him. Shows like "That's SO Raven" taught children and teenagers how to have fun, learn and to be respectful to their parents. Any one born in the 90’s would say that they enjoyed coming home from a long hot day at school, having to deal with annoying teachers every day, looked forward to watching new episodes of their favorite Disney shows. I would spend countless hours watching good quality shows. No matter what time of day, I found myself watching an amusing show. In today’s time, if you have been watching Disney Channel you will find the total opposite. Times have changed, and more importantly shows changed too. “Lizzie McGuire” transformed into a show named “A.N.T Farm”, and it is about an eleven year old genius, Chyna, with an amazing voice. I remember when Lizzie used to sing; she also had an amazing voice and was a genius as well. Sadly, what used to be Lizzie is now Chyna, and it is disappointing to see one of my favorite characters, dismissed and stumbled by an eleven year old. “Hannah Montana” became two twin sisters bickering at each other in “Liv and Maddie”. Last but not least, “That’s SO Raven” was overtaken by a Nanny with ungrateful adopted kids in “Jessie”. In one recalled episode of “Jessie” Zuri throws a pancake at a gluten-free appetite character, and Jessie just sat there like an idiot watching and does not get up to stop the fighting. Kids are buying into this ridiculous display of characters. I am hoping the shows will get better, otherwise kids in the future will never learn how to be as smart as Lizzie, as cool as Raven, and as talented as Hannah Montana. Old Disney shows had bigger meaning for society. For example, Lizzie McGuire discussed the treacherous struggles of dealing with awkward stages and bullies. In addition to that, in one episode of “That’s SO Raven”, Raven taught children about body image and how beauty did not only come in sizes two and four. The type of lessons children need to learn today instead of learning how to dance, and making conversation with a talking dog. I worry about the future generation if producers continue making these awful shows like “Dog with a Blog”. Entertainment impacts children and I believe that teaching children about a “dog” with a “blog” will influence them to actually believe dogs operate computers and write blogs. I was taught that the only thing a dog can do to communicate is bark and cry. Children will believe anything you tell them because their minds are not fully developed. Disney Channel is continuing to brain wash them and I do not respect them for that. Disney Channel had such a good reputation, but that clearly diminished with the addition of pointless shows.
eye? Many critics argue that Disney productions have the ability to affect American children and
In the documentary “Bowling for Columbine” one the few shows that were mentioned by people looking for something to blame was South Park. In the documentary, Michael Moore even got to sit down and talk to Matt Stone, co-creator of South Park and get his take on the shooting. Oddly enough both Matt and Trey Parker, the other co-creator of South Park, went to Columbine high for high school themselves. So, during the discussion Moore had with Matt, Matt was able to talk about Columbine high from a personal experience. How it was, like most high schools, “Painfully, painfully, painfully normal, just absolutely painfully horribly average.” He also points out some the unneeded stress high schools can bring. He also says that when it comes to Eric and Dylan, he wishes, “Someone could have just grabbed him and gone, ‘dude, high school is not the end’ […] It’s amazing how fast you lose touch with all those people.” Going back to the specific argument that shows like South Park corrupted these kids, even if that were true, it’s not the shows fault. The show itself is rated TV-MA, meaning it is inappropriate for children under the age of 17. Here comes and argument that can also be used against all the previously stated arguments. Instead of blaming the shows, the violent video games, or the music, none of which were intended for kids and are being accused of corrupting kids, why not blame the parents? This argument is incredibly strong against violent video games being accused for corrupting kids, since there is an age limit of 17 to even buy an “M” rated game. If a kid has a violent video game, theres a strong chance their parents bought it for them. Even at the counter if there is a kid present when the parent is buying an “M” rated game the clerk has to point out it is rated “M” and what it is rated “M” for. If an adult hands a kid a beer, would you blame the beer for getting the kid drunk, or the parent who gave the
After reading The “Most Dangerous Game” we, as a class, were asked whether or not it is considered correct to kill someone but, like a ballot, there were mixed results. This can branch out into a wide variety of topics ranging from abortion to downright murder. “Most Dangerous game” is a short story about a man named Rainsford who gets saved after a boat crash. The man who saved him, General Zaroff, is a hunter. A trait both share in common. However, Zaroff kills humans rather than animals in that the hunt is more thrilling. Of course, there is a disagreement on the subject matter to further the plot. Rainsford is completely opposed to the idea of killing his own kind. We also analyzed the film, “The Hunger Games”. Katniss Everdeen was forced into an arena where the only way to stay alive was to kill others. Both pieces of literature are a survival of the fittest test. Both had justifiable reasons for killing and it made reputable, however morbid, sense.
It’s not acceptable for young viewers to be exposed to such inappropriate material. These shows and movies are teaching future generations poor morals. Morals are concerned with the principles of right and wrong behavior and the goodness or badness of human character. People with low moral self esteem later on in life experience a hard time connecting with their peers. I think parents need to monitor what their children are watching whether that be on TV, Youtube, etc. Will you be the parent to let your children watch this type of
The debate over the good and bad aspects of Disney movies has been going on for years. It has become a part of pop culture in a way never expected through things such as YouTube videos and meme’s. While looking at multiple Disney movies may give a wider range of example of both the good and the bad in Disney movies, to help depict the effects the movies actually have on kids it is most beneficial to study just one movie. Zia’s essay argues that Disney movies have a good influence on children by teaching them good life morals. However, one of her examples, Mulan, is not an example of achievement through hard work like Zia explains, but rather a change made through magic, and example of the horrible historical inaccuracies made in Disney movies and the lack of parental respect that they teach children.
Over time there has been a major debate over television and children. Some think that kids shouldn’t watch it, some say that it is okay in moderation, and others say it doesn’t have any effects. The real debate starts when one starts to talk about the content of the shows. Sesame Street is a show that most would say is for all ages, but is it truly educational? Can kids really learn from it?
Kids are very impressionable human beings, they see one thing and they begin to imitate this thing. Reality TV enables kids to think for themselves. Going back to the show Maury, it is mostly African American teenagers seen yelling and screaming at the top of their lungs making a spectacle of themselves. Teenagers watch reality television more than anything else. One statistic states, “On average, a teen will watch 28 hours of television per week, adding up to almost 15,000 hours a year” (reportherald.com). Shows such as Love & Hip Hop, exposes teens to
In today’s modern age, young children are being raised by their TV screen. Reining from the original tales of Perrault and the Grim Brothers, the Disney princess line has been a staple on the screens since the 1930s (Do Rozario 1). However, these princesses have gone through dramatic changes to remain relevant to todays youth. The effects that can be influenced by the roles expressed in these types of films send mixed messages to the audience, causing them to ask themselves whether or not they should believe what the princess is expressing on the screen.
Since the introduction of Disney films into our society, there has been a sea change
Walt Disney has created its own television network known as “Disney channel” using the logo of the famous Mickey Mouse. The network developed different shows that were not exclusively for children but had a wide range of target viewers. A great number of viewers are mostly female children who more often than not portray and imitate the princesses in the film. These female children probably tend to identify themselves as the animated characters. Most of the fantasy stories that were produced made use of film as a tool to expose the shows.
From humble beginnings as a cartoon studio in the 1920s to today 's global corporation, The Walt Disney Company continues to proudly provide quality entertainment for every member of the family, across America and around the world. One of the key statements in the text states, “Disney’s greatest challenge today is to keep a 90- year- old brand relevant and current to its core audience while staying true to its heritage and core brand values.” (Kotler, Keller, 2012, p. 179) Diversification has been one of Disney’s smartest business decisions. Today Disney has ventured into various industries such as studio entertainment,
What many people don’t know is that Mickey Mouse wasn’t always a good influence to not only children but to many others also. Over the years Mickey Mouse has evolved into an icon that is worthy of children’s attention and their parents’ money. Through the use of movies, television shows, video games, theme parks and merchandise Mickey Mouse affects most children’s lives every day even if it isn’t noticeable. Mickey Mouse has also given rise to many big movie productions and sales. While being educational Mickey Mouse also entertains children and teaches them a lesson that children enjoy and find fun. Not only does Mickey Mouse have educational purposes he also tries to form a Utopia environment for all families that use and watch Mickey’s products.
Television programs that are targeted towards children, such as cartoons, can affect children in both positive and negative ways. I examined a variety of cartoons on both commercial and public television to observe the content of children's programming and determine the effects, both positive and negative, that programs have on children. The cartoons contain a wide variety of subject matters that can influence children in many different ways. I found that the majority of cartoons choose to use violence and inappropriate subject matter to entertain children. These images and stories can have a tremendous negative impact on children because the violence is rewarded without consequences, is glorified, and idealized. Children look up to the characters that have a negative impact by distorting their views on conflict resolution. There are, however, cartoons that contain little or no violence and often try to incorporate educational lessons that concern values and morals that are important for children to learn, thus having a positive impact.
Children love television, movies, and games. From personal experience, many life lessons instilled in me were from the former sitcom Full House. Each episode contained a “moral of the story” and it was demonstrated through real life, relatable examples. I did not have to steal to know it was wrong, I watched Michelle Tanner (character on Full House) do it for me. Perhaps we should invest in generating blockbuster movies and amusing sitcoms to indistinguishably revise cultural norms.
Not to mention, Adult Swim cartoons are the worst for a child. Those cartoons are strictly cartoons for adults, because they contain more mature content. With this in mind children will find a way to watch them anyway. Shows like Family Guy has extreme violence, profanity, and sexual references. In reality children will start fighting more aggressively, using profound words and phrases and make sexual references towards one another. The consequences are kids can pick up bad habits from watching cartoons that contain violent