Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Karl marx theory on class
Merits and demerits of karl marx's theory of social class
Stalin social policies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Karl marx theory on class
Discussion on Whether Stalin Was a Necessary Evil
Marxism was a doctrine formulated by Karl Marx about the elimination
of economic inequality and class conflicts. According to Marxism
social and political relationships depend on economic factors because
whichever group in society controls the "means of production" also has
political control. Marx believed that historical change was a series
of stages that were influenced by economic forces and that each stage
had to be completed before the next could begin. In a classes and
stateless society, co-operation will replace competition and this
final and perfect stage of human history would be communism.
In Russia the government was essentially feudal, the majority of the
population were peasants, and capitalism was in its infancy. Lenin
realised that in order to bring about revolution Marxism would have to
be adopted to suit these conditions. Lenin developed the argument that
the economic resources that imperialism provided were used to "buy
off" workers in capitalist countries by improving working and living
conditions. This made workers less revolutionary, as the system did
not appear to be treating them badly. His view of the dictatorship of
the Proletariat was that the Party would form a dictatorship to fight
counter-revolutionary attempts, take away private property and end
free enterprise to build a secure socialist state.
The 1917 February Revolution saw the end of the Romanov dynasty as
Tsar Nicholas abdicated and his place soviets (Russian for councils)
were set up across the country to represent soldiers, workers and
peasants, which allowed the Provisional Government led by A...
... middle of paper ...
...onstraints. Stalin established system that
lacked a smooth transition of power after his death and dragged the
USSR into a Cold War with America who had the ability to out produce
and out spend because of its market based economy and privatisation of
debt.
Stalin's harsh polices are indefensible on a moral or human level. The
idea of the end justifying the means as his modus operandi was
erroneous and the staggering cost in human lives overrides any
progression achieved under a brutal rule.
---------------------------
1. (From Page 2)- A quote from one of Stalin's speeches
Bibliography
· Dimitri Volkogonov, 1991,Stalin: Triumph and Tragedy, Phoenix Press,
London.
· Vicki Greer and Robert Darlington, 2002, Flashpoints: National and
International Studies, Heinemann- Hardcourt Education, Melbourne.
The Russian revolution was made with the goal of creating an egalitarian government that was based off of Karl Marx’s socialism principles. In short, they used Karl Marx’s socialist principles as a basis for their communist government that developed after the revolution.
Stalin’s hunger for power and paranoia impacted the Soviet society severely, having devastating effects on the Communist Party, leaving it weak and shattering the framework of the party, the people of Russia, by stunting the growth of technology and progress through the purges of many educated civilians, as well as affecting The Red Army, a powerful military depleted of it’s force. The impact of the purges, ‘show trials’ and the Terror on Soviet society were rigorously negative. By purging all his challengers and opponents, Stalin created a blanket of fear over the whole society, and therefore, was able to stay in power, creating an empire that he could find more dependable.
People say that the Stalin’s Great Purges could otherwise be translated as Stalin’s Terror. They grew from his paranoia and his desire to be absolute autocrat, and were enforced the NKVD and public show trials. When someone went against him, he didn’t really take any time in doing something about it. He would “get rid of” the people that went against industrialization and the kulaks. Kulaks were farmers in the later Russian Empire. (“Of Russian Origin: Stalin’s Purges). There were many reasons as to what caused the Great Purges but the main one seems to be Stalin. He believed that the country had to be united under the circumstances that he becomes the leader if it was to be strong. The Soviet Union was industry was weal and in the decline, obviously lacking the capacity to produce enough meal and heavy machinery for the imminent war.
George Orwell represented Joseph Stalin in his book, “Animal Farm” with a character named Napoleon. In his book he was telling the story of the Russian Revolution in a satirical way when he changed the story he made it to where all the important people or group of people were represented through one animal. Napoleon, a pig, was Joseph Stalin; Orwell represented him by relating all the events that occurred into a reverse reality where it was put into an easier form to show how the events happened. To show this relation even more Joseph Stalin’s history must be revealed, how he relates to Napoleon, and if George Orwell did a good job representing Stalin.
Though it existed for over 70 years, many of the Soviet Union’s structures were put in place before and during Stalin’s reign. Milovan Djilas succinctly summarized the general Soviet system in his book, The New Class when he wrote “There is no fundamental difference in the Communist system between governmental services and party organizations, as in the example of the party and the secret police. The party and the police mingle very closely…the difference between them is only in the distribution of work” (Djilas, pg 73). The system Djilas described was one where the Bolshevik party was in absolute control of the government and all its functions. This included the bureaucracy, and secret police, as well as the military. As a result, the Bolshevik party was in total control of all the Soviet Union’s levers of power. It was effectively an autocracy of the Communist party, at the head of which rested Joseph Stalin, whose power was absolute and as close to god-like, as anyone had ever had. Nikita Khrushchev testified to Stalin’s autocratic power in his book, Khrushchev Remembers, when he wrote, “Stalin adapted all methods of indoctrination to his own purposes. He demanded unthinking obedience and unquestioning faith” (Khrushchev, pg 8). Khrushchev was undoubtedly politically biased against Stalin, but his statement seems to be in line with the latter’s record of achievements. The purges of
The evidence is overwhelming; from his abusive mother and father, to the influence of Karl Marx on his life, to his admiration of Machiavelli. I think that these are the reasons behind Joseph Stalin’s reign of terror because it has been proven that children who grow up in an abusive household tend to become later in life, and because Marxism was a very popular idea at that time. I also believe Marxist beliefs had an impact because, to an abused farm boy, Marxism could appeal to him. I still hold firm to my claim that the reason that when we think of Joseph Stalin's Reign of Terror, we think of one of the most disgusting and horrifying crimes in all of human history, is because of his brutal childhood in rural Georgia, and his complete belief in various Marxist
was able to hold on to leadership of the Soviet Union. He was able to
Stalin continued even once he was successful in accomplishing those goals, as he did not stop hurting people, but if anything it gave him more power to hurt people even more. But, at the end of the day, although Lenin ruled for only a very short time, he did raise the standard of living, though there maintained a large amount of hardship. Stalin, however, transformed the USSR from a peasantry to an industrialized nation in less than a decade, he did it on the backs of his millions of victims, who died because of his harsh policies and many purges. Lenin made a series of policies throughout the beginning of the Revolution and through his short time in public office that came to be collectively known as ‘Leninism’. There were many things that influenced Leninism, such as Karl Marx.
At the start of the 20th century, Russia began to rapidly change. The Czarist autocracy that was previously in place was overthrown and the most influential family, the Romanovs, were no more. The Russian Revolution was soon in full swing and people were needed to take charge. One of the leader who emerges as a result of this is Joseph Stalin. Starting out as a simple countryside peasant, he quickly rose to a position of power. Eventually reaching the position of dictator, he implemented new policies that would further industrialize Russia as well as further progressing his goal of having total control over the Russian people. These policies include his 5-year plans as well as the creation of a totalitarian state. Joseph Stalin is, by many, considered one of the most ruthless leaders in the history of the world.
...se to power and implemented War Communism. Communism on its own is a salacious subject. It is the manner in which he won victory in comparison to Tsar Nicholas II who was repeatedly defeated and yet with both rulers the people of Russia still suffered, this is what drew my attention. However Lenin is humble enough to realise the problem and corrects it with the New Economic Policy, this shows good leadership indeed. I chose this topic to explore the thoughts that possibly went through Lenin’s mind, why there was a need to adjust from War Communism to the New Economic Policy and whether this change beneficial to Russia. I aim to show the conditions of Russia during both policies, and highlight what the people and the government wanted in comparison to what was needed. I shall also discuss why War Communism failed and why the New Economic Policy was more successful.
As the tsarist regime fell, Lenin and the Bolshevik Party entered Russia. They operated on a Marxist platform and operated quickly to “develop Russia in such a way as to spread social revolution throughout Europe and eventually the world.” Though their opponents were also Marxist the Bolsheviks were the most militant, least tolerant and most revolutionary. After toppling the remaining dictatorial powers during the October Revolution the Bolsheviks created multiple Soviets and disclosed all the secrets of the tsars, including the treatises that had been made with other countries. All of this was done in an effort to expose the corruption of the capitalist countries and the old regime. What the party did not count on, however, was how their actions would impact the rest of Europe and how other nations would respond.
During the 1900’s the Russian Government made it extremely hard for the Bolsheviks to progress which made them revolt against the government making this a prime matter for the start of the Revolution. The Czarist government was ostracized by the common people of Russia so Tsar Nicholas II was overthrown by the Provisional Government, whom later on were overthrown by Lenin and shortly after the Bolsheviks took control over Russia. Russia was hard to develop because of the major leaders who had control; Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky. Almost overnight an entire society was destroyed and replaced with one of the most radical social experiments ever seen. Poverty, crime, privileged and class-divisions were to be eliminated, a new era of socialism promised peace, prosperity and equality for all the peoples of the world. But the social experiment failed, millions were killed, and within a generation almost one-third of the world’s population was living in the shadows of communism.
Marx, in his theory of historical materialism, advocates that political and historical events result from the conflict of social forces. His theory focuses on the class struggles and the human attempts to control and dominate the natural environment. Profits obtained by the capitalists are a result of the workers being exploited. This conflict will lead to a revolution in which the workers control the state. Thus, capitalism will be replaced by socialism. The result is freedom for all. In the Soviet Union, the lower class overthrew the ruling class and created a new mode of production. This new economic base then determined political, social and ideological changes in its society. The failure of the Soviet Union impacts the validity of Marxian historical materialism because it discredits materialistic
Lenin’s reforms were necessary to carry out a socialist revolution in Russia, and the contributions he made drastically changed the course of history. It can be assumed that, the Soviet Union would not have been as powerful if it had not been for Lenin’s initial advocacy of violence and tight organization. Marxism is a philosophy coined by Karl Marx with the help of Friedrich Engles in the early nineteenth century. Marx’s writings inspired many progressive thinkers throughout the European continent and the United States. The Marxist doctrine stated that first a bourgeoisie revolution, which will ignite a capitalist fire.
Marx thought of a society that would create equality and bring power to the people. He didn 't expect society to be totally equal but a society with distributed justice. According to Marx, a good society is when there is no exploitation. To get rid of exploitation, we have to get rid of surplus values and make everyone equal. But Marx also knows that no good society can exist as long as exploitation is allowed. That is why some societies will want a Marx type of living and some will not. A society that has used and embodied the Marxist tradition is Russia. They have used Marx ideas and lived by the communist manifesto. This way of life worked for many years and to the people of Russia, it made a good society. But to people outside of Russia, people who lived in a democratic state or country, they looked at it as a failed society. A type of society that should not be allowed to exist in the world of democracy. But like Marx said, some societies will be able to live in a Marxist environment and some won’t. Marx also states, “ In a communist society, the working class will be more important than the capital class”(M 10-25-2016). By having everyone equal, this allows for class conflict to be no more and exploitation not exist. Marx knows there can be no good society but a Marxist society will do its best to form a ideal