Discourse Analysis: Alcoholic Decision-Making

428 Words1 Page

In the centre of ground theory stands to build theory from data and to form and describe concepts which build the blocks of the given theory (Corbin, & Strauss, 2008). Process of analysis in case of grounded theory is casual, flexible and determined by the insight obtained from the data (Corbin & Staruss, 2008). This approach is positivist and the open coding allows to identify the most important variables (Corbin & Staruss, 1998). The interview and its grounded theory analysis reports regarding the conceptions of how distance learning is managed. It aims to illustrate in-depth explanations through cycling, reoccurring thoughts and which allow to generate theory against them. As per Threlkeld, Brezoska notes (1994) for successful distance learning, …show more content…

All types of discourse analysis aim to create a meta level of meaning, instead of simply interpreting the semantic meaning. It is useful tool to achieve theoretical and pragmatical goals but the meaning should not be delivered as an absolute interpretation (Frost, 2011). The alcoholic transcript presented a binary dilemma. The discourses regarding acceptance and denial of being an alcoholic shows what a complex process is to make the first step towards a successful anonymous alcoholics meeting. Drinking might illustrates a stronger gender identity for our subject and presumes that undertaking alcoholism might mean a social stigma and loosing masculinity (Kaminer, & Dixon, 1995). The second discourse features the tension towards the meetings and forming an equal membership and accepting that there is no difference between people in these groups. Edward's status as an alcoholic is not automatically granted by attending the AA meetings. This morally laden dilemma regards identity must be targeted and

Open Document