Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of corporate governance
Corporate governance rules and principles
Definition of corporate governance essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of corporate governance
Corporate governance is the framework designed to facilitate direction and performance of companies. Dees, Lumpkin, Eisner & McNamara (2012) itemized the primary participants as (1) the shareholders, (2) the management (led by the CEO), and (3) the board of directors (BOD)” (p. 330). Effective corporate governance can attribute to improved financial performance, customer satisfaction and growth for corporations.
Inside vs Outside Directors
Six out 10 total BOD members met the Independence Standards defined by The NASDAQ Stock Market. Dollar Tree requires a mix of inside and outside directors with majority of members serving on the BOD meeting Independence Standards defined by The NASDAQ Stock Market. Dees, Lumpkin, Eisner & McNamara (2012) explained regarding director independence, “a minimum number of insiders (past or present members of the management team) should serve on the board, and that directors and their firms should be barred from doing consulting, legal, or other work for the company” (p.335)
Separation of CEO and Chairman Positions
Dollar Tree’s Corporate Governance guidelines
…show more content…
Supermajority votes limit how far a majority of shareholders can impose on management decisions. CalPERS expressed the supermajority vote of two-thirds of the BOD was impossible to obtain.
Staggered Board Terms
CalPERS proposal also included removing the BODs staggered structure. Staggered boards may protect ineffective management and encourage entrenchment. Kehan and Rock (2014) found, “These provisions could have a plausible impact on corporate governance because staggered boards can impede hostile takeovers and shareholders may seek bylaw amendments to, for example, establish proxy access or separate the positions of Chairman of the Board and CEO” (p. 2016).
Does analysis favor Dollar Tree or CalPERS’
Ralph Nader, Mark Green and Joel Seligman, in an excerpt from Taming the Giant Corporation (1976, found in Honest Work by Ciulla, Martin and Solomon), take the current role of the company board of directors and suggest changes that should be made to make the board to be efficient. They claim the current makeup of the board does not necessarily do justice to the company because “in nearly every large American business…there exists a management autocracy” (Nader, Green and Seligman, 1976, p.570). The main resolution they present is to make the board more democratic with the betterment of the company as its first priority. Currently the board no longer oversees operations, or elects top company executives and they are no longer involved in the business operations to the extent they should be. Nadar, Green and Seligman argue that that all of these things need to be changed. For a corporation so large to be successful there must be separation of powers just as there is in any current government system ( p.571). They claim this is the only and best way to success (Nader, Green and Seligman, 1976, p.570-571).
Since the SEC had been doubted for a long time that whether they had the authority to promulgate proxy access rules, especially the doubts arose by the filing of the Business Roundtable complaint , the Dodd-Frank Act’s providing of such statutory authority to the SEC was necessary to erase such doubts. And the SEC has already taken advantages of such authority and approved a rule that allows shareholders with at least 3% of a company’s stock to include nominees for up to 25% of the directorial positions.
Bibliography: Turnbull, S. (1997). Corporate governance: its scope, concerns and theories. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 5 (4), pp. 180--205.
Corporate governance implies governing a company/organization by a set of rules, principles, systems and processes. It guides the company about how to achieve its vision in a way that benefits the company and provides long-term benefits to its stakeholders. In the corporate business context, stake-holders comprise board of directors, management, employees and with the rising awareness about Corporate Social Responsibility; it includes shareholders and society as well. The principles which...
Nottingham Trent University. (2013). Lecture 1 - An Introduction to Corporate Governance. Available: https://now.ntu.ac.uk/d2l/le/content/248250/viewContent/1053845/View. Last accessed 16th Dec 2013.
The Board of Directors is consisted of 11 members: James M. Elliot, the Chairman of the Board, 3 inside members and 7 outside members. The economy is stable and profitable, but that also means a lot of competition in the market. This poses a great opportunity for the company to grow and gain more of the market share. The only foreseeable real threat that the company will face is new competitors in the market.
There are many different factors that have led to the issues with corporate governance, but some of the most important to consider include the fact that corporate accounting has shifted toward the interest of protecting and providing for individuals in the company, investor protection rules have become too relaxed, and the fact that “too many corporate executives and directors have been placed in positions of great power and authority without an adequate understanding of their fiduciary duties” (Bogle, p. 31). Bogle provides multiple scenarios as to how to help with these issues, and some of them are essentially describing a movement back to traditional owners capitalism. First, he notes that the most major thing that needs to be reformed is stockholder rights, and policies that limit those. Regarding the stockholders, Bogle says that reforms should be made so to better allow stockholders to have a say-so in election of corporate board members, as well as have the rights to help in replacing one if needed. For example, instead of a company’s CEO appointing its board members, the stockholders should appoint them because as stockholders they reserve the right to have some input into the way the company in governed.
It is concluded that neither of the above proposals are adequate in that any practical benefit that results from the proposal such as employee and shareholder engagement are outweighed by the theoretical impact of increasing the overlap of the organs which would alter the structure of company law. The legal side of directors’ remuneration appears to be sufficient with the directors’ duties legislation acting as an efficient preventative measure for the problems that directors’ remuneration creates. Furthermore, shareholders already must approve several payments as such this could be strengthened to tackle the issue and employees are to some extent taken care of within s172 as such it is these sections that need development rather than directors’ remuneration.
Shareholder agreements allow for the rearranging of voting rights so that in the case of a corporate decision to make fundamental changes such as in the structure, the bylaws or to merge the company, the power is fairly distributed. These types of charter amendment decisions are usually adopted by supermajority voting of shareholders in order to protect minority shareholders from being excluded –their decision power is comparatively smaller than the majority shareholders. If there wasn’t a clause requiring supermajority for special resolutions in the shareholder’s agreement, a director appointed by the minority sh...
The debate whether diversity is beneficial to corporate governance or not has persisted over the years. In this context, the concept of diversity relates to boardroom composition and the wide-ranging blend of characteristics, expertise, and attributes supplied by individual board members (Grosvold, Brammer and Rayton, 2007, p. 344). What is more, diversity in corporate boards of directors can assume a variety of forms, counting individual demographics such as, nationality, race, ethnicity, and gender (Singh, Terjesen, and Vinnicombe, 2008, p.48). Boardroom diversity in listed companies is dictated by an array of diverse factors, including profitability, company size, as well as the size of the board (the number of non-executive and executive directors) (Grosvold, Brammer and Rayton, 2007, p.346). In listed companies, the board of directors usually serves at least four significant roles i.e. controlling as well as monitoring managers, providing counsel and information to managers, ensuring conformity with relevant laws as well as regulations, plus connecting the corporation to the external business environment (Carter et al. 2010, p.398).
Organizations that only have top management as the board members are more susceptible to accounting malpractices. Members of the board should preferably own shares in the company to ensure diligence when it comes to the interests of the company. Apart from the Board of Governors, there should also be an audit committee in place to oversee the financial dealings of the bank. Members of the board and the audit committee should have basic financial knowledge. Some of the members should also be experts in finances so that they can detect any anomaly that may take place in terms of financial reporting. An overhaul of the regulatory framework is required to empower authorities to intervene immediately, and make improvements. New technology is required. Manual antiquated processes should be eliminated because this causes greater human error and poor
The board membership, irrespective of executive or non executive membership, is very crucial in the governance and management of the company. However, as the duties and responsibilities of directors vary according to their type of directorship; the rewards should also match the responsibilities carried out and be in line with the performance shown over period of time.
In the present case, the company (LP) has six individuals on the board of directors (Andy, Brian, Chris, David, Evan and Faith). All these directors, particularly Andy, felt that it would be prudent to restructure
K, . N., ER, w., DAVID, K., PAUL, M., WALTER, O., & EVANS, A. (2012). Corporate governance theories and their application to boards of directors: A critical literature review . Prime Journal of Business Administration and Management (BAM), 2(12)(2251-1261), 782-787.
The office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement (ODCE, 2015), Ireland defines Corporate Governance as “the system, principles and process by which organisations are directed and controlled. The principles underlying corporate governance are based on conducting the business with integrity and fairness, being transparent with regard to all transactions, making all the necessary disclosures and decisions and complying with all the laws of the land”. It is the system for protecting and advancing the shareholder’s interest by setting strategic direction for the firm and achieving them by electing and monitoring the capable management (Solomon, 2010). It is the process of protecting the stakes of various parties that have their interest attached with a company (Fernando, 2009). Corporate governance is the procedure through which the management of the company is achieving the goals of various stake holders (Becht, Macro, Patrick and Alisa,