Dinesh D'souza The Democratic Party Analysis

Hillary’s America delves into the history of Dinesh D’Souza, Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic Party. Here, Dinesh D’Souza creates a refreshingly alternative viewpoint of the Democratic Party, compared to mainstream media’s usual left-wing stance. Being rather histrionic, watching this film for any reason other than for entertainment would be unadvisable. While containing many truths, Dinesh D’Souza’s documentary seems rather biased. This bias is understandable due to the harsh sentencing of his crimes, but if one is trying to convince others of something they believe, it should be done with bold truth rather than with exaggerations. Primarily, the history of the Democratic Party is no where near a secret. Any average highschool student

While it is understood that Andrew Jackson is no example of a great president or man, D’Souza tries too hard in trying to exemplify his negative aspects. Many can agree that Jackson’s Indian Removal Act was a horrible decision, but to consider him a hater of Native Americans would be unjust; He seemed to have enough humanity within him to adopt an orphaned Native boy and raised him as his own. Of course, this side of Jackson was not mentioned, as it does not support Dinesh D’Souza’s motive. The most innacurate portrayal in the film is D’Souza’s completely unsupported accusation of Jackson partaking in sexual affairs with his slaves. While he had been known to be cruel to some slaves, there is no evidence that Jackson ever had sexual relations with his slaves- consensual or

The way D’Souza tells it, this democratic congressman was so keen on defending slavery that he physically attacked this Republican Senator in defiance. Dinesh D’Souza fails to mention that the real reason for this attack was due to Senator Sumner’s personalized verbal attack on Preston Brooks’ superior, the elderly South Carolina Senator Andrew Butler. Dinesh D’Souza once again alters history, trying to create a bad and good side, or the democratic and republican parties, respectfully. He talks down on Democratic President Woodrow Wilson as a progressive, but fails to mention a very similar president, Theodore Roosevelt, who ran on the “Progressive Party ticket” and attacked the very idea of private property. The one thing that separates these two presidents is political party; Roosevelt was a Republican. This only goes to further prove what Dinesh D’Souza tried to hard to hide; both parties are disastrous. There is not one set good