Different Personalities in Stargirl by Jerry Spinelli

725 Words2 Pages

How far can you go to lose yourself? What distance are we willing to tred to dim the glow of your own starlight? In Jerry Spinelli’s Stargirl several characters have vastly different personalities. Or do they? Is Leo Borlock really different from Hillary Kimble? Do they not both care for normality? For the attention of others? When Stargirl Caraway arrives, a butterfly engulfed by mist, the world shifted and grasped for an opportunity to hold onto something… divergent. An anomaly so far down their path, they could hardly reach it. So they grow to hate it, dead grass rising but never quite touching the soft delicacy of Stargirl’s petals. If something can’t be understood, it is not good enough to be loved. That’s how we’ve all been raised; to comprehend and to discover and to keep stretching out our arms to the answers when they just flow through the cracks of our normalcy like water. Society stones it until the mountain is just as low as the dirt itself, and no one has to be jealous anymore. No one has to wonder how they could have touched the docility of grey clouds. No one has to wonder what distance they went to not to be that sole splash of color in a world of white.
In the long trek of life, people are constantly chided to follow their hearts, and to be themselves, and to let our individuality run free. As Georg Simmel once said,“The deepest problems of modern life derive from the claim of the individual to preserve the autonomy and individuality of his existence in the face of overwhelming social forces, of historical heritage, of external culture, and of the technique of life.” He is utterly correct. Every person, every mind and every heart, has their own way of doing things. We have associated individuality with singularit...

... middle of paper ...

... constant battle with our hearts, that resist the forces of our instinct. Instincts that enforce a single cooperating body of humanity. In short, we seek only the feeling of true euphoria with ourselves, and see our world as incorrect perfection.
Perhaps, despite consistent changes, our individuality is not completely renewed. Not renewed when trends are altered, or when we’ve lost interest in our former idols. Perhaps, when our minds are taken to think as another would, our individualities are only being transformed to fit that state. Change could very possibly be the number one ingredient necessary to loss of uniqueness. Humans can adjust quite quickly to different environments, and that maybe as much a curse as it is a gift. People change themselves too hastily, at times, not caring for the possibility that they are going against things they want, need and love.

Open Document