Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Character development recitatif
An essay on character development
Character development recitatif
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Have you ever compared a movie to a story and found that there are many similarities and differences? Short story writers such as Washington Irving, Katherine Anne Potter, and Nathaniel Hawthorne wrote modern and contemporary pieces of literature that have many examples of literary components that are similar and different. When analyzing the literary components of the short stories, you are able to compare and contrast the setting, plot, and characters from the movie and the story.
The setting of a story portrays the place where events in a story occur. In movies, the setting is portrayed through the screen in the picture, that the audience can see. While, in stories, the author has to use mood, tone, and description to help the reader
…show more content…
imagine the place where the characters are. First I found similarities between the movie settings to the setting in the story. The Jilting of Granny Weatherall most the events happen in Granny’s house or in her bedroom. Since Granny becomes ill in the movie and was already ill in the story, most of the events occur in her bedroom because Granny was too ill to walk and move around, I think the producer kept this setting the same because the majority of the written story happens with Granny in bed. Eliminating this detail would have changed the entire story because without Granny in bed, where would she rest? Another comparison I found was in Rappaccini’s Daughter. In Rappaccini’s Daughter, the stories took place in Italy, by a university because, Giovanni was looking for a university education. The university is where Giovanni planned on staying. Also in both the story and movie there was a window where Giovanni would peer into Rappaccini’s garden. In the garden, there was a bush with purple pedals on it that Rappaccini won’t touch, but Beatrice would. This is how Giovanni notices Beatrice, this also leads to their friendship/ romance. I think the producer had the settings similar to the settings of the story because the window and the garden are to two focal points of the story. I think that the entire story would have been changed if the producer changed the setting of the story. If the producer had left out the garden and the place where Giovanni was staying, it would have changed the outcome. Then I found differences in the movie settings and the story settings. In Sleepy Hollow, the producer had Ichabod Crane in a different setting than the setting he was in for the story.
In the movie starts with Ichabod Crane seen in New York City, as a police inspector, who has been assigned to go to the town of Sleepy Hollow to investigate the recent murders. While in the story, Ichabod Crane was a schoolmaster in Tarrytown. I think the producer had the name of the town be Sleepy Hollow because it is a commonly known name that his audience would know. I also think he changed the name to show that the movie is scary and spooky. Another difference between the movie and the story of Sleepy Hollow was, in the movie, the town where the events occurred was known as Sleepy Hollow; however in the story, the town was known as Tarrytown. Sleepy Hollow was the name of the valley in the story. I think the producer had Ichabod Crane in New York City as the police, instead of being the schoolmaster in Tarrytown, so that the producer would be able to elaborate and expand the original story. By having Ichabod Crane as a police officer, the producer was able to create other characters that were killed by the horseman. This made the movie more interesting. Another story and movie that had a difference in setting was The Jilting of Granny Weatherall. In the movie, Granny went to a chicken hen to
collect fresh eggs for her white cake. She was making the white cake because it reminds her of her wedding day, and Granny insisted that everything was fresh. However, the story does not mention Granny gathering eggs from chickens. I think the producer added this detail to expand on how granny was feeling before the heart attack. It shows that she was healthy and active in the house before becoming ill. Overall producers can alter or keep the settings of stories to fit into their movies. The plot of a story or movie is as important as the setting. The plot is made up of important events that build the story. The plot includes rising action, a climax and falling action. Both movie and story have a plot, however, some of the events may be different. When comparing the plots of the movies and stories I was able to find similarities. One similarity I found was in the Jilting of Granny Weatherall. In both the movie and story granny was dying but didn’t want to blow out a candle. By blowing out the candle, it symbolizes that she was ready to die. Finally at the end Granny blows out a candle and she dies peacefully. I don’t think the producer changed this event because it was the conclusion of the story. The movie would have had to continue if Granny didn’t die. Another similarity I found was in Rappaccini's Daughter. In Rappaccini’s Daughter, Giovanni got handprints from when Beatrice tries to stop him from touching the flower. Beatrice tried to stop him from touching the flower because she knew it was poisonous and it would kill him. I think the producer decided to keep this detail in the movie because it gives a reason to why Beatrice is so protective of Giovanni in the Garden. If Beatrice didn’t grab his hand, Giovanni would have died. This also shows that Beatrice cares for Giovanni’s well-being. After finding similarities in the movies and stories, I was then able to find differences in the plots used in the movies and stories. The movie and story have two different ways the Headless Horseman lost his head. The story suggests that a cannon ball took the horseman's head off during a battle in the Revolutionary war; While, in the movie, the horseman was decapitated by a sword and was buried in the woods of sleepy hollow. I think the producer changed this detail in the stories plot to support the other events in the movie. The entire movie is based on the horseman not having his head in his grave and the head controlled his actions. Also in the story of Sleepy Hollow, Crane was the only victim of the horseman. But in the movie, there were multiple victims before Crane even went to sleepy hollow and when Crane went to sleepy hollow, he was not killed by the horseman. I think the producer changed this plot detail in the movie so it would support his decision of making Crane a police officer sent to sleepy hollow to investigate murders. By changing the detail, the producer was able to support his previous change to the setting. Then in the Jilting of Granny Weatherall, the movie starts off with Granny being well. The movie shows the events that lead up to Granny’s heart attack. While, in the story, has Granny already very ill, and she is being examined by a doctor. I think the producer did this because he wanted to show the audience the health of Granny before the heart attack. Also, I think he changed it because it allowed him to elaborate and expand on the original story. Finally in Rappaccini's Daughter, the last event in the plot was different in the story and movie. In the movie, Giovanni and Beatrice are in the garden when Rappaccini walked in and told them that they would be together in the garden for eternity, but in the story Giovanni gives Beatrice an anecdote that would “save” her. The anecdote killed Beatrice because nothing could save her. I think the producer changed the ending to give the story a more fairy tale ending. I think the producer did that because he wanted to have the audience think about the future of Giovanni and Beatrice. Just like how setting can determine the plot of the story, the plot and setting both determine the characters.
Many people assume that the book and movie of the same story are always very similar, but they are incorrect. In my comparison of the short story Rikki-tikki-tavi by Rudyard Kipling and the movie of Rikki-tikki-tavi, I found them to be rather different. There were many minor differences, but the three main topics in the short story that clearly differentiate it from the movie are the setting, the character traits, and the use of humor.
The story, The Legend of Sleepy Hollow, was written by Washington Irving, and the story is about a man name Ichabod Crane who was trying to win Katherina Van Tassel’s hand in marriage, but he is failing. The small town named Sleepy Hollow has a folklore about the Headless Horseman, who rides through the town at night to find his head. Irving explains that Sleepy Hollow has many ghost stories, but the Headless Horseman is the most popular in the town. Ichabod Crane was a school master, and he was killed by the town’s ghost. The townspeople believed Crane was taken by the Galloping Hessian, so the story of the Headless Horseman would not be associated with Crane’s disappearance. As the news about Ichabod’s disappearance rummage through the town, the Brom Bones’ reaction to the news made people question the Galloping Hessian’s part
...rbidden love, whereas Irving’s tale is a tale of possible unrequited love. The characters are vaguely similar in both the written story and the movie, but the glaring difference is that while Ichabod possibly flees from Sleepy Hollow because he was frightened beyond his limits, the movie allows him to denounce any superstition in order to wed his beloved.
"Unit 2: Reading & Writing About Short Fiction." ENGL200: Composition and Literature. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011. 49-219. Web. 19 Apr. 2014.
The term setting refers to the time and place of a story or play. There are four different settings in this book. It is like this because the book is divided into four different sections. The four sections are Bessie, The School, The Arena, and The Mountains. All of these sections have totally different settings.
Instead, he made Ichabod Crane a detective who had his own vision on how to solve crimes. In the movie Ichabod is sent to the small village of Sleepy Hollow where a murder of three town’s people has occurred and they want him to solve it. Soon enough, he meets Katrina, whom Ichabod falls in love with, similar to Irving’s original story. Brom once again becomes jealous of this situation. The beginning of the story is very much similar to Washington Irving’s original. However, the main difference is that Ichabod is a detective; he is attempting to resolve a murder mystery. The murder consists of three people who had their heads cut off yet the heads are not being found anywhere. Even though Tim Burton did incorporate Washington Irving’s original story, he chose to include his own version of what happened. Only in the beginning does he chose to show Brom pretending to the cloaked horseman. Burton does include a sudden alteration; he decided to introduce magic and witchcraft. A witch controls an actual demon who was behind the killing who is the horseman. Katrina’s stepmother, who is the true witch, now possesses greed and
"A Pair of Tickets" and "Everything That Rises Must Converge" are good examples of how setting explores place, heritage, and ethnic identity to give us a better understanding of the characters. In "A Pair of Tickets" Jing-Mei Woo discovers for herself what makes her Chinese and the setting played an important role in helping us understand how she came to this discovery. The setting in "Everything That Rises Must Converge" gave us a good understanding of why the characters acted as they did to the situations presented. The setting in both of these stories greatly contributed to the understanding the characters better and in general the whole story.
In traditional writing styles, the main element to give the story meaning is the narrative itself. However, with more modern and distinct styles such as the short stories written where the narrative is no longer the primary stylistic device, but the use of metaphors and distinctive different narrators applies meaning to the stories. Though it is easy to judge what is different from tradition as inferior, this change is no different than the rise of cubism in the art world. Even though initially many would comment on the art not being “real,” or in this case, the stories being poorly written, this style has even more of an effect. After
?The Legend of Sleepy Hollow? is a short story by Washington Irving. Based on a well-known legend, this story tells the tale of the disappearance of the main character, Ichabod Crane. An effective ghost story, Irving leaves you guessing what the truth is behind the ending. The movie Sleepy Hollow is Hollywood?s portrayal of Irving?s original story. Although the movie is similar to the story in the beginning, the movie takes a twist that leads in another direction that strays far from the original plot.
As most everyone knows, there are differences between a book and it’s movie adaptation. This is applicable to the book and it’s movie counterpart To Kill a Mockingbird, as well. But aside from the differences, there are also similarities between these two.
The story has different elements that make it a story, that make it whole. Setting is one of those elements. The book defines setting as “the context in which the action of the story occurs” (131). After reading “Soldier’s Home” by Ernest Hemmingway, setting played a very important part to this story. A different setting could possibly change the outcome or the mood of the story and here are some reasons why.
There are usually differences in two different versions of something. This can often be seen when a book is made into a movie. There are many similarities and differences in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.
The sleepy hallow is one of the most thrilling books I have ever read. The book takes us to the town called “Sleepy Hollow” where we follow Ichabod Crane. Sleepy Hollow is a very small town where the residents believe that it is enchanted. Sleepy hollow’s most famous supernatural is the ghost of the Headless Horseman. Speaking about the story of sleepy hollow, I recently watched a movie about the thrilling story. The movie had a lot of differences from the book. Furthermore, this essay will compare and differentiate the book from the movie.
Although at times it is easy to get carried away with the adventure of a story, noticing the elements a writer has put into his work is very important. In reading “Young Goodman Brown” and “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” you can see both similarities as well as differences of how both Nathaniel Hawthorne and Washington Irving chose to illuminate their romantic writing styles. The writers both use a mystical woodsy setting with supernatural twists to draw in readers. Underlying you will find the differing romantic themes each writer used, as well as how each writer chose to end their work.
Although the titles of the two works are relatively similar, the plot of each is different. If the film does not include the character, Ichabod Crane, and the reference to a Headless Horseman, the film would have no resemblance to Irving’s story. The difference in structure of plot in the two works changes the entire story. Every facet of the story is different between the two. The exposition offers the audience different stories because Ichabod has a new profession in the movie. The conflict in the two w...