Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rise and fall of the ancient empire of Egypt
Why did alexander invade persia lesson 5 alexander and the hellenistic era
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rise and fall of the ancient empire of Egypt
Expansion is a significant element of most ancient cultures. However, not many reach the expansion magnitude of either Alexander the Great of Macedon or Rome. Both cultures are known for some of histories most breath taking expeditions of their times. Though the journey may have been troubling for these societies, both cultures brought great honor and wealth home in their own distinctive ways. While both the culture of Rome and Macedon during the time of Alexander the Great have quite a large number of differences in their dreams of expansion and how to maintain the home front while the soldiers are away, the similarities they share of scare tactics and how to handle their Greek neighbors are undeniable. In broad terms, both Rome and Macedon …show more content…
In fact, with many key concepts, they were much more similar than some people would think. One of the most successful tactics of war that they share is the fear tactic, which usually involved violent means for execution. Alexander the Great was especially known for these. While he could have his moments of compassion, such as when he spared the lives of Darius’ family after the once noble king fled from battle (Martin, Ancient Greece, 246), he also had his vindictive side. This was especially true for those who opposed him, such as the city of Tyre. While Alexander was trekking through the Persian lands, Tyre refused to surrender to him. In turn, the King of Macedon burnt the city to the ground for its disobedient and disrespect (Martin, Ancient Greece, 246). This sent a strong message for his opponents, and it carried volumes. This is extremely similar to what the Romans did in respects to the Greeks. When the Greeks showed resistance to following the Roman’s rule, they burnt the rich city of Corinth to the ground to send a message of what would happen to those who did not follow their law (Martin, Ancient Rome, 78). Their path of destruction did not end there either. They followed this one up by mowing over their rivals, the Carthaginians, after the Third Punic Wars (Martin, Ancient Rome, 78). As a result of both of these culture’s merciless tactics, they were able …show more content…
Both of these empires were able to conquer vast lands to enrich their cities and bring glory to their name. In doing so they managed to make many rivals, but against all odds they showed the world just how clever and dangerous they truly are. By this account, even though these countries share some similarities, this does not diminish the impact these cultures had on the times they were alive. They ruled with the strong hand of a right king, and though these tactics might seem merciless to some, it is the way to rule a land
The Han dynasty and the Roman Civilization were the superpowers of the world at that time. They influenced the world and left an indelible mark in the ancient world. Traces of their contributions are ubiquitous, ranging from the invention of paper to the Latin language. Both shared similarities and grew due to a strong government and profitable trade. Yet due to numerous factors, both Empires pulverized under intense pressure and never returned to their former glory.
To start there are their similarities. The biggest similarity of the two is that both empires survived into the 20th century while their other contemporaries did not. Secondly the two empires were alike in their strong armies. Their armies which were made strong most notably by their rulers, the Russian Peter the Great and the Ottoman Suleiman the Magnificent, and a further but related
When comparing different societies in ancient history you may not think that Han China and Ancient Rome had a lot in common. These two great societies had many similarities and differences, especially in their social structures. These similarities and differences are all due to Han China’s and Ancient Rome’s governments, family structures and religions. Both of these wonderful empires lasted for approximately 400 years and had lasting effects on the lands they conquered.
Ancient Greek tragedies and the Peloponnesian War were similar in one huge way. They both portrayed “hubris.” Athens was very hubris in the Peloponnesian War against Sparta because they thought they were going to win and sent out most of their army to defeat Sparta.
Two important, mighty Asian empires in history are the Ottoman Empire and the Ming China. These two empires are in totally different areas of Asia – the Ottomans were in the very west, the Chinese were in the oriental east. Therefore, these two empires, naturally, formed completely different cultures. However, surprisingly, these empires had many parts in common as well. The Ottoman Empire and the Ming Dynasty had both many different and distinct parts, as well as many similarities.
Thucydides sets down the development of the relationship between the power of Athens and Sparta in the Archeology. Athens emerges from the Persian Wars as the undisputed commercial superpower in Greece. Where Sparta is located in the fertile Peloponnesus, and is thus able to sustain itself on agriculture alone, making trade unnecessary and allowing it to maintain its own laws and customs for “more than four hundred years” (I.18.1), Athens’ infertile land forces it to turn to olive oil for revenue, and it consequently develops a flourishing trade economy even before the Darius set his sights on Greece. The Persian invasion itself makes a sea power out of Athens, allowing it to establish a Mediterranean empire, and export its culture and government to the rest of Greece (I.18.2, I.6.3). This serves to unify the scattered Ionian and Doric cities under the umbrella of the Hellenes culturally where the Spartan campaign to remove tyrants unifies it politically by giving Greeks relative freedom and subordinating it uniformly to the law, and the joint coalition against the Persians ultimately secured it militarily (I.
Greeks and Romans are famous for the strategy's that they used. The Greeks main strategy was called the Phanlax. They basically have a rectangle of troops and each on...
These civilizations present many resemblances that were once part of the foundations of their society. Although both of these civilizations were at one point enemies of one another, they had similar correlations that shaped and formed their cultures and societies. The main difference between these two civilizations is religion. Without its differences, each civilization had governed its people in manners that it could not be differentiated among each other. Overall, these civilizations presented different methods of leading a civilization and still had similarities among one another.
More than two thousand years ago, two great empires arose. The Chinese and the Roman Empires. Having different locations, there were obvious differences from the start, assembly and the collapse of the empires, but there were also astonishing similarities. Located in modern time Asia and Europe, the Chinese and Roman empires were revolutionary with their ideas and accomplishments in their time from the start to the end of their empires.
The occurance of the dynastic cycle in these two dynastys was similar and differnet in many ways. Both empires were
Together but separate they started an economy centered on some form of money. While very different from each other both Empires saw it important to have some form of art and to show their people the glory they earned. Although they created Empires with a decent economy they were just as bad as previous Empires before them and did not last past the 1600s. It seems that in order to keep things straight and keep a country lasting without down fall wars and fighting need to end and instead people should join freely with each other or leave each other alone to do as they wish. All Empires, kingdoms, etc… must fail at some point it seems this conclusion is based on the falling of the Roman Empire, Byzantine Empire, Ottoman and Habsburg Empires and all other Empires that lasted several thousand years before they reached their
In the years following the Persian Wars in 479 B.C., Athens had come out on top being the most dominantly powerful of any Greek city with a navy that had superior strength that increased day by day. The Athenians “ruled with heavy-handed, even brutal force as well as with reason” (Kagan 2). This was due largely to the fact that Athens had a stable and effective government, which only increased their advantage in proving themselv...
The ancient Greeks and Romans were perhaps two of the greatest civilizations of the ancient world. These two civilizations thrived in their ancient environments which eventually led to a vast amount of prosperity within these two cultures. It is because of this prosperity that these ancient cultures were able to make a variety of advancements in literature, architecture, art and a variety of other fields. These two civilizations also produced some of the ancient world’s greatest writers, leaders, and philosophers. The cultures of ancient Greece and Rome made a number of contributions to western civilization in the form of advancements in literature, architecture, art, government, and philosophy.
Carthage and Rome were very similar in their desire to be in power. Where they differed was in their military skills. Carthage was a naval force, while Rome was an army force. Carthage used their wealth to increase their holdings in the area, Carthage had a strong naval force and due to their location on the coast they were successful merchants.
We might say that when Greece was conquered by Rome, it was Greece who civilized Rome (Morey, 1901). The Rome's conquest exemplifies how Athens of Greece was determined to the expansion of territory prominently influenced Rome, the conquest tycoon of foreign territories. The military might of Rome was illuminated similarly to Sparta’s indigenous of war battles. In Etruscans, the architectural designs of building arches influenced the structures of Roman prominent buildings existed today. Finally, Rome influenced were seen in Rome’s new ideas of religion and philosophy, literature, and art, which were adopted from Greeks of Athens.