Difference Between Colonialism And Postcolonialism

1670 Words4 Pages

POSTCOLONIAL THEORY AND POST MODERNISM

In this chapter I am going to briefly discuss one of the Post Modern school’s theories the Postcolonial theory and its concepts, mainly referring to ideas of Homi K Bhaba one of the leading postcolonial theorists whom has a great influence to the field of studies itself and its application to Architectural studies.
To start with understanding the term Postcolonialism it might be helpful to look at the explanations given to the words Post Colonial: “Occurring or existing after the end of colonial rule” and Colonize: “Send settlers to (a place)and establish political control over it” at Oxford dictionary. (Oxford dictionaries, 2014) Postcolonial theory analyses, explains and responds to cultural influences …show more content…

First it uncovers how colonisers use architecture as a tool to enforce new social, cultural and political directions in order to continue controlling the colonised substances. This aspect can be observed in colonial cities where the coloniser uses the city “as the spatial materialisation of the ‘civilising mission’, while simultaneously representing the violence of colonisation.” (Hernandez, 2010) By assuming that colonised people are uneducated and in need of learning the European norms and habits which includes living in European fashioned cities, instantaneously the new spatial orders such as orthogonal grids lead onto keeping the colonial leaders in the city’s core and push the locals away from them, either outside the city walls or at the periphery areas of the town. Second it analysis the way history of Architecture has been written to grant authority to the European Architecture. This effect can be easily observed in architectural history books, up until lately, showing non-western architecture as elite architecture only if they are made similar to European style with aspects equivalent to them, works of architects such as Brazilian Oscar Niemeyer, Indian Balkrishna Doshi or Malaysian Ken Yeang that show great amount of European styled …show more content…

He describes his experience in Bombay during early university years in Location of Culture as “ It was lived in that rich cultural mix of languages and lifestyles that most cosmopolitan Indian cities celebrate and perpetuate in their vernacular existence- Bombay Hindustani, ‘Parsi’ Gujarati, mongrel Marathi, all held in a suspension of Welsh-missionary-accented English peppered with an Anglo-Indian patois that was sometimes cast aside for American slang picked up from the movies or popular music” (Bhabha, 2004). Beside from Bhabha’s adamic life in England and America another fact that made Bhabha experience difficulties as part of a minority group is that he belongs to Parsi race (Zoroastrian people moved to India from Persia, when Islam came to Great Persia, with approximately 100,000 population all around the word today). Bhabha’s attention to the cultural creations made by minority groups either invisibly in the centre or at the edges is the basis of developments criticizing the way that non-western architecture has been described. Bhabha reads buildings carefully just the way he analysis text, “ For Bhabha, architectural details (door knobs, windows, window locks, screens, radiators) convey a sense of humanity, they bring forward the existence of an inhabitant (or

Open Document