Difference Between Actus And Mens Rea

259 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Importance of actus reus in criminal law

When defining the difference between actus reus and mens rea you must first understand what each term means before determining the difference, the difference between the two are significant when it is being used in a court case. Actus reus simply means the guilty act in Latin to where mens rea is the intent to commit a crime. There are crimes in which are intended to cause harm to others intentionally and then there are some that are unintentionally. They are significant within criminal law because prosecutors need to be able to prove that a crime was committed with intent before they can use mens rea. An example of actus reus with mens rea would be a teenager has been writing in a journal that he wants to kill certain kids from his school.

Show More
Related

  • R. V. Charemski Case Study

    1289 Words  | 3 Pages

    Men rea is used in determining whether an act is considered a crime, and is applied to an act if there is indication that the act was committed with intent or knowledge or a degree of recklessness. The mens era of murder is having malice intentions prior to killing someone, so the person has an intent to murder. The argument that helps support that Martineau did not have the mens rea for murder, is the fact that he did not shoot the couple, and instead it was his friend Tremblay who had fried the pellet pistol. Martineau cannot be held accountable since he had no malice intentions to kill the couple, his intentions were strictly centred with the break and enter, there is no evidence

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Aurelius And Lucretius

    1625 Words  | 4 Pages

    Lucretius and Marcus Aurelius, have both similar and different views on the role that death plays in life and philosophy. They both believe our fear is due in some part to the uncertainty that surrounds the process of death. However, both philosophers have dissimilar approaches on why we shouldn’t fear the unknown concept of death. Drawing from these reasons and explanations, they arrive at the way this fear affects our lives and what we should do to change it.

    Read More

  • Wicked Inusation In Scots Law

    1478 Words  | 3 Pages

    This is a completely separate and alternative aspect of mens rea, and it is assumed that the accused does not have an intention to kill. There is a clear difference between the mens rea of ‘recklessness’ for crimes other than murder, and ‘wicked recklessness’ for murder. This was determined in Cawthorne v HMA when the accused fired a high-velocity rifle through a wooden door into a room where four people were situated in an attempt to escape from him. He made no attempt to stop any danger from happening but fired five shots at a height where it may have been foreseeable that he could cause serious harm or injury. On the assumption that this intent was only to frighten these people and not to kill them, the appeal court still determined that the accused had shown the wicked recklessness necessary for murder. In this case it was held that the mens rea of murder, or attempted murder, could be proved by such recklessness that to show that the accused was regardless of the consequences of his actions, that he was completely indifferent to whether anyone died as a result of his actions. Cawthorne is now a clear precedent both that the mens rea of criminal attempt Is exactly the same as that for the completed crime and that wicked recklessness is a separate form of the mens rea of murder. Wicked recklessness is described by Gordon as recklessness which is “so gross that it indicates a state of mind of a deliberate

    Read More

  • Attempt Solicitation And Conspiracy Essay

    1077 Words  | 3 Pages

    When it comes to the elements of attempt there are two. It is the purpose or intent to commit a specific crime and an act(s) in order to carry out the intent. There are two types of attempt statures and they are general attempt statute and specific attempt statute. General attempt statute is a single statute that involves the attempt to commit any crime in the state’s criminal code. An example of this is just any crime. Specific attempt statute is defining attempts as specific crimes. An example of this is attempted murder. Prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal attempt cases and these are attempt mens rea and actus rea. Attempt mens rea is the specific attempt to commit a crime and actus reus is taking steps to complete a crime.

    Read More

  • Kenneth Parks Case Study On Actus Reus

    353 Words  | 1 Pages

    Actus reus was present during this case. The act of Kenneth Parks getting up and driving to his in-laws house and murdering them is proving actus reus. On the other hand mens reus is not present because Kenneth Parks did not intend to purposely kill his in-laws and also was not in the right mental state. He was genuinely in a hypnotic state where he has no control over his mind or body.

    Read More

  • Romulus And Remus

    1020 Words  | 3 Pages

    The work essentially parallels des Louvre’s definition of a myth in that the latter must: justify actions of a family or city, refers to something of collective importance, is independent of any particular text, and carries an aura of truth without one, distinct author. With its underpinning lying in a spiritual level, the myth demonstrates the strength and power of Rome’s historic creators, justifies battles through its underlying theme of war, explains the necessity and almost implied success of a city whose creators were so closely intertwined with divinity, as well as notes the rationale behind Rome’s specific location, and is a significant, traditional tale told through generations of Roman families. Therefore, Romulus and Remus is a

    Read More

  • Loss Of Morality In Julius Caesar

    210 Words  | 1 Pages

    In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Brutus demonstrates a Loss of Morality when he justifies why killing Caesar would be a noble deed by condemning the idea of additionally slaying Caesar's associate, Mark Antony.

    Read More

  • Attempted Murder and Criminal Acts

    1039 Words  | 3 Pages

    Attempted murder, involved the voluntary act of Jack pointing a gun and firing it (act) at Bert that resulted in (causation) death of Pratt (social harm), which proves the elements of actus reus. ...

    Read More

  • Curran's Argumentative Analysis

    261 Words  | 1 Pages

    Additionally, Curran seems to contradict himself early in his argument. He contends that “Macbeth teaches us... bad thoughts lead to bad deeds” (Curran 392). In this paragraph, Curran makes a distinction between mens rea and actus reus, which is a distinction that he argues against for the remainder of his essay. He argues that the murder of Duncan is a result of Macbeth’s knowledge of the witches’ prophecy. These claims support the idea that Macbeth had thoughts of murdering Duncan before actually killing him. This represents the separation of mind from action because Macbeth had the idea of murder after the witches indirectly planted the idea in his head after reciting the prophecy. However, Curran’s main argument is that there is no dichotomy

    Read More

  • Involuntary Manslaughter Research Paper

    950 Words  | 2 Pages

    Common law and modern state statutes typically divide manslaughter and murder into two different levels of crime. Common law, for instance, separates manslaughter into two separate categories. The first category would be voluntary manslaughter and the second category would be involuntary manslaughter. Manslaughter, alone, is all homicides without justification or excuse. Modern state statues, in the other hand, divide murder into first- and second-degree murder, both of which require the prosecutor to establish intent and malice. Murder, alone, is all homicides that are neither excused nor justified.

    Read More

  • Essay On Adult Sentencing

    565 Words  | 2 Pages

    Retribution means the offender is punished in respect to what they deserved. It is looked at in correlation to the crime they committed. Retribution does not try to change behaviour.

    Read More

  • General Intent Crimes

    312 Words  | 1 Pages

    Specific intent crimes generally require that the offender has intentionally committed and illegal act and intended a certain result when they committed the act (General Intent Crimes vs. Specific Intent Crimes, 2017). For an

    Read More

  • Verdun-Jones Case

    837 Words  | 2 Pages

    49) so it can be argued that the next element of actus reus was not fulfilled as he did not have control over the vehicle. The intention to set the vehicle in motion can create the risk of danger to persons or property because of this intention is considered by the court (R. v. Boudreault, 2012). Since the keys to the motor vehicle were in the pocket of the accused, it is clear that the accused did not have the intention to set the vehicle in motion. With this the accused established that the purpose of sitting in the driver’s seat was not to set the vehicle in motion which satisfies section 258 (1)(a) of the Criminal Code. Since the keys were in the pocket of the accused there was no risk of him accidently operating the vehicle, and there was only a slight risk of the accused trying to intentionally operate the vehicle that could be argued against

    Read More

  • Key Similarities and Differences Between Roman Delict and Common Law Tort

    1969 Words  | 4 Pages

    A tort can be defined as a wrong that interferes with a person’s legally protected interests , whereas, a delict can be defined as a wrongful act causing damage to someone’s personality, family or property. There are many similarities between the Roman law of Delicts and the common law of Torts, including the similarity between the tort of liability for animals and the Actio de Pauperie and the Edict of the Aediles, the tort of trespass to land and the tort of wrongful death which is similar to the delict of wrongful damage to property or the Lex Aquila. The similarity between the tort of trespass to chattels and the delict of theft and robbery, and the similarity between the tort of trespass to the person, in the form of assault and the delict of insult or injuria. However there is only one major difference between the roman law of delicts and the common law of torts, the roman law of delicts has a penal element to its punishment , whereas the common law of torts is strictly a civil and compensatory damages punishment.

    Read More

  • Automatism, Insanity and Diminished Responsibility

    1568 Words  | 4 Pages

    A defence in criminal law arises when conditions exist to negate specific elements of the crime: the actus reus when actions are involuntary, the mens rea when the defendant is unaware of the significance of their conduct, or both. These defences will mitigate or eliminate liability from a criminal offence. Insanity, automatism and diminished responsibility are examples of said defences. They each share characteristics but can be distinguished in their scope and application.

    Read More

More about Difference Between Actus And Mens Rea

Open Document