Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Active observation and active observation
Active observation and active observation
What is the importance of observation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Active observation and active observation
Knowledge production through passive observation and active experiment are used in all areas of knowledge and has been crucial in creating knowledge for humankind. But, are passive observation and active experiment the only two ways of producing knowledge? To fully explore this knowledge issue it is essential that “passive observation” and “active experiment” are defined. Passive observation can be defined as gaining knowledge from noticing how something works, without directly affecting the process of outcome. On the other hand, active experiment can be seen as gaining knowledge through interfering and manipulation until eventually affecting the outcome of what they are studying. In other words, active experiment is observation plus the altercation …show more content…
Passive observation is often used in science when something is newly discovered or that scientists are unable to experiment on the subject. For example, in astronomy, it is very difficult to actually experiment on the stars and planets since they are so far away. Because of this, scientists are only able to observe them through microscopes to gain knowledge. Active experiment is used within the natural sciences whenever scientists manipulate and interfere with natural processes to determine an outcome. Scientist often use this active experiment as a process to further explore what they already know from passive observation. These are seen as the basic ways of producing knowledge in all natural sciences but there are other methods, specific to certain sections within natural sciences. Creating and developing theories often included passive observation and active experiment but requires further reasoning as well as logical assumption to form reasonable theory. Scientific theories can be seen as a form of knowledge as it describes natural processes in a generic way but cannot be developed entirely through passive observation or active experiment. It also requires reason and logic from what was originally observed to come up with the theory. An example of this could be seen from Darwin’s theory of evolution. He observed and experimented on different species of animals and realized that many had similar characteristics and features. After observing countless pieces of evidence, he came with the theory that certain species had evolved from a common ancestor, giving the similar characteristic but also slight variation. Darwin’s theory did not come solely from passive observation or active experimentation on animal species but also involved critical reason and logic. This demonstrates how some
How we approach the question of knowledge is pivotal. If the definition of knowledge is a necessary truth, then we should aim for a real definition for theoretical and practical knowledge. Methodology examines the purpose for the definition and how we arrived to it. The reader is now aware of the various ways to dissect what knowledge is. This entails the possibility of knowledge being a set of truths; from which it follows that one cannot possibly give a single definition. The definition given must therefore satisfy certain desiderata , while being strong enough to demonstrate clarity without losing the reader. If we base our definition on every counter-example that disproves our original definition then it becomes ad hoc. This is the case for our current defini...
First, when observations are made, hypothesises are formed. To test these hypothesises scientists conduct experiments. If their hypothesis is right, it is confirmed by further experiments and validated by other scientists. After many experiments and confirmations, a theory is formed. A scientific theory is a broad and general idea or explanation provided by scientists and is related to observations and is supported by a large amount of evidence. A theory is not a fact however it is just a possible explanation. An example of a theory is the Big Bang Theory.
Science is a way of approaching the world, knowing why and how things around us are occurring. The scientific method allows scientists to be precise and focused. Through that medium, they can determine which hypotheses are consistently supported such that they become theories and which need more modification or rejection. This type of knowing can be tested and quantified. Scientists strive to make their observations as objective as possible, to be devoid of human interest. Scientists try to control all the variables ...
The operation of observation establishes a distinction between self-reference and external reference, between what is observed and the observing system. The distinction actualised decides how the world appears to the system.
The book is not providing explanation on what scientists did or how they did it. However, it offer explanations on how scientists think and how they make conclusions. In addition to the many topics explored, it is worth noting that there are also interesting tales behind some big discoveries in science which are an added attraction to this book. The Author, Dr Samir Okasha, a professor of philosophy of science at the Bristol University states that his aim of writing this book was to pass the philosophy of science in a way that can be understood by everyone. He also sought to pass his ideals in a manner that is free from complicated Jargon, with real world examples to enable all readers understand and
Knowledge is rarely considered permanent, because it is constantly changing and adapting as time passes and new discoveries are made. This title roughly translates into the question: to what extent is knowledge provisional? In other words, to what extent does knowledge exist for the present, possibly to be changed in the future? At first glance, one’s mind would immediately stray to the natural sciences, and how theories are constantly being challenged, disproven, and discarded. Because of this, one might be under the impression that knowledge is always provisional because there is always room for improvement; however, there are some cases in which this is not true. There are plenty of ideas and theories that have withstood the test of time, but on the other end of the spectrum there are many that have not. This essay will evaluate the extent to which knowledge is provisional in the areas of the human sciences and history.
Observation evidence plays an important role in science discovery. This kind of evidence is produced by the perceptual sensation like hearing, seeing, touching, smelling and tasting, with the assistance of some instruments like microscope, telescope and stethoscope (Bogen, 2009). The most common example of using observational evidence can be Galileo used the telescope to observe the four satellites of Jupiter in 1610. This can be a piece of observational evidence in Astronomy. In medicine, observational study means the researchers obtain the evidence through observing the condition of the patient under exposur...
Science is the observation of natural events and conditions in order to discover facts about them and to formulate laws and principles based on these facts. Academic Press Dictionary of Science & Technology --------------------------------------------------------------------- Science is an intellectual activity carried on by humans that is designed to discover information about the natural world in which humans live and to discover the ways in which this information can be organized into meaningful patterns. A primary aim of science is to collect facts (data).
Question No. 5 “No knowledge can be produced by a single way of knowing.” Discuss.
Albert Einstein said, “We shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if mankind is to survive.” This new manner of thinking should be based on pre-existing knowledge. This pre-existing knowledge is necessary because it is the catalyst that pushes the human race forward, making us want to discover more. Trying to discover completely new knowledge would not yield the same results. Basing your research off what you already know allows you to compare the new data that you collected to the old data that is already present. If you discover something new you will have nothing to compare it with. This does not allow you the luxury of seeing if what you discovered was an improvement. This essay will examine how important it is to discover new ways of thinking about prior knowledge than it is to discover new facts. I believe that using prior knowledge to push discovery is much more important than trying to discovers new data or facts.
We learn about the acquisition of knowledge from the moment we are born. We first think that we make knowledge claims through our senses when we are growing up and recognise knowledge in many forms and different sources. We are trained over 13 years in school in various subject areas such as Mathematics, Science, History, and many different subjects, and we are forced to learn the details whatever is in the book. The scientists and mathematicians reasoning lead them to come up with these theories. With the help of knowledge that we gain from these subject areas, we are able to apply them in our daily lives. I being a Mathematics Higher level and Physics Standard level student, I come across so many theories made by various scientist and mathematicians. With the help of their formulas I am able to do my experiments and other internal assessments. I often question myself of how do they come with these theories? Another question arises in our minds whether the information that we are absorbing is reliable and true? It takes a lot of effort for the scientists to prove a theory wrong. It requires a lot of paper work to be done and an effective experiment should be shown to the world so that they believe that the theory is true. There were many theories being formed in the ancient times and we use quite a lot of them till today. However, there were some theories to be superseded as the years went by and it was very much common in the field of Mathematics and Natural Sciences. This lead to republishing of textbooks and many other sources so that the society learns correct form of knowledge. A question arises in our minds whether what we are going to learn today, will it be wrong tomorrow?
These guidelines can then be re-organised centrally for production and are fine-tuned with feedback from themselves, their surroundings and others. They will only choose to use these modelled behaviours in the future if they have the motivation to do so. These four processes form the cornerstones of observational learning theory: Attention, Retention, Production and Motivation. It is through examination of these processes that I will discuss how knowledge is being acquired by the learners in my
Knowledge is but understanding. How we indulge and interpret an issue is knowledge. In the pursuit of knowledge, we, as materialistic learners and knowers, repeatedly ignore crucial procedures, pro...
Passive observation or active experimentation is not the only way to produce knowledge, they cannot be used per se; and they require other additional ways of knowing such as imagination and faith. “There are only two ways in which humankind can produce knowledge”. Just from this statement, numerous questions already arise. First of all, how do we define knowledge? Knowledge, at its core, is information we acquire through experience and education. But the “production” of knowledge is arguable, can knowledge really be produced by humans, or is it discovered?
...e. I do profoundly agree with the Kant’s philosophy that all knowledge is achieved through experience and filtered through our reasoning processes. It is just that most of the times we are not aware of the input, or else we are not ready to acquire it! Probably this is the factor that creates humans with (the so called) paranormal potentials.